Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPicture books that call slaves "servants" and show them smiling?
If more African American people had jobs in the industry, would this kind of mistake (or deliberate action) have happened?
On edit: Scholastic has apologized and taken the book off the market.
http://www.salon.com/2016/01/18/smiling_slaves_at_story_time_these_picture_books_show_why_we_need_more_diversity_in_publishing_too/
Having seen an advance copy of A Birthday Cake for George Washington, the children and teen book editor at Kirkus Reviews, Vicky Smith, was moved to write a preemptive apologia which nonetheless failed to notice that the illustrator, Vanessa Brantley-Newton, called the slaves servants, as if they just happened to be at the low end of a social hierarchy, and were happy to have a great job working for such a powerful man. And yet, Smith pointed out, the books author, Ramin Ganeshram, inadvertently gave the lie to this statement in an authors note telling readers that the main historical character featured in the book, a slave named Hercules, left behind his young daughter Delia when he escaped. Smith concludes: Its easy to understand why Ganeshram opted to leave those details out of her primary narrative: theyre a serious downer for readers, and they dont have anything to do with the cake. But the story that remains nevertheless shares much of what A Fine Desserts critics found so objectionable: its an incomplete, even dishonest treatment of slavery.
Yesterday, Scholastic announced it was stopping the distribution of A Birthday Cake for George Washington and would accept all returns. While we have great respect for the integrity and scholarship of the author, illustrator, and editor, we believe that, without more historical background on the evils of slavery than this book for younger children can provide, the book may give a false impression of the reality of the lives of slaves and therefore should be withdrawn, the publishers statement said.
How, then, should childrens book authors and illustrators approach the subject of slavery in early American kitchens? Is it better to simply avoid the topic altogether as being inherently unsuitable for picture books? African-American culinary historian Michael W. Twitty blogs at Afroculinaria and is the author of the forthcoming book The Cooking Gene. Hes an expert in the history of race, slavery and American food. In an email to me, Twitty explained: Children must learn about slavery in the United States and in the Western world in general, because, to quote the last Republican campaign, We built this.' He adds: I think the illustrator of A Fine Dessert meant well in depicting the role of enslaved people as part of the plantation household, but its the smile that confuses us. We smiled to hide our feelings. We wear the mask that grins and lies.
The trouble is that readers who have never considered slavery from the slaves point of view will tend to interpret those smiles as benign, irrespective of whether the illustrator intended them as smiles of mother-daughter love, or smiles of pleasure at a job well done. But our people werent eating that dessert, Twitty asserts. Being enslaved wasnt a job or a joy, it was being a non-citizen and a non-human. I think for those who have worn the period clothing and done period cooking on plantations, its easy to see how such a rosy depiction can later translate at best to ignorance and at worst indignant surprise at the sensitivity Black Americans express at the depiction of their past as a mercy.
Yesterday, Scholastic announced it was stopping the distribution of A Birthday Cake for George Washington and would accept all returns. While we have great respect for the integrity and scholarship of the author, illustrator, and editor, we believe that, without more historical background on the evils of slavery than this book for younger children can provide, the book may give a false impression of the reality of the lives of slaves and therefore should be withdrawn, the publishers statement said.
How, then, should childrens book authors and illustrators approach the subject of slavery in early American kitchens? Is it better to simply avoid the topic altogether as being inherently unsuitable for picture books? African-American culinary historian Michael W. Twitty blogs at Afroculinaria and is the author of the forthcoming book The Cooking Gene. Hes an expert in the history of race, slavery and American food. In an email to me, Twitty explained: Children must learn about slavery in the United States and in the Western world in general, because, to quote the last Republican campaign, We built this.' He adds: I think the illustrator of A Fine Dessert meant well in depicting the role of enslaved people as part of the plantation household, but its the smile that confuses us. We smiled to hide our feelings. We wear the mask that grins and lies.
The trouble is that readers who have never considered slavery from the slaves point of view will tend to interpret those smiles as benign, irrespective of whether the illustrator intended them as smiles of mother-daughter love, or smiles of pleasure at a job well done. But our people werent eating that dessert, Twitty asserts. Being enslaved wasnt a job or a joy, it was being a non-citizen and a non-human. I think for those who have worn the period clothing and done period cooking on plantations, its easy to see how such a rosy depiction can later translate at best to ignorance and at worst indignant surprise at the sensitivity Black Americans express at the depiction of their past as a mercy.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1714 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Picture books that call slaves "servants" and show them smiling? (Original Post)
pnwmom
Jan 2016
OP
kiva
(4,373 posts)1. She should have asked Lizzie Mae
kiva
(4,373 posts)3. You're welcome,
it's a great series, very clever.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)4. I think I'm in love.
pnwmom
(109,001 posts)5. Wasn't she terrific?
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)8. Yes, yes!
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)6. Some find it uncomfortable to face up to the fact that Washington was a racist slavemaster,
and Jefferson too.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)7. And they shouldn't. It's history.
One of my pet peeves is adjusting facts to fit desired results.