Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:13 AM Jan 2016

"Frankly, he isn't ready for the job. I think that Hillary Clinton would do a number on him."



WASHINGTON -- Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) still isn't sure which candidate he'll back in the GOP primary for president, but it won't be Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas).

"Ted's smart, but I think that Hillary Clinton would do a number on him," Graham told Fox News radio host Brian Kilmeade on Friday.

Graham, who dropped his own presidential bid late last month, has said that challenging Cruz -- as well as Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) -- was one of the main reasons he launched his campaign in the first place. He has called Cruz an extremist for being willing to shut down the federal government, and he has criticized Cruz's foreign policy approach.

"Frankly, he isn't ready for the job. His foreign policy is very uneven," Graham said of Cruz on Friday.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/lindsey-graham-ted-cruz_569011f7e4b0c8beacf6f091
27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Frankly, he isn't ready for the job. I think that Hillary Clinton would do a number on him." (Original Post) Miles Archer Jan 2016 OP
If he thinks Hillary would do a number on Cruz, freedom fighter jh Jan 2016 #1
When Lindsay Graham dropped out of the race it left Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #2
Why have the words "foreign policy "...... daleanime Jan 2016 #5
For the same reason we now call it the defense department Cassiopeia Jan 2016 #6
There is much more to foreign policy than wars, has been and will be. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #11
Not under another President Clinton..... daleanime Jan 2016 #18
Sanders has said he would take military action, said he would use drones, do Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #22
I disagree with him on that.... daleanime Jan 2016 #24
Lindsey's a nativist ethnophobic nationalist warmonger. Hortensis Jan 2016 #13
I was talking about his foreign police knowledge, what decisions he would make may not fit Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #14
I believe they greatly distort his judgement Hortensis Jan 2016 #15
Yes, morals can enter the equation also. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #23
Agreed. As would Bernie. n/t pampango Jan 2016 #3
I did not think a photo TNNurse Jan 2016 #4
No one should be judged by their face or physical appearance, but.... maddiemom Jan 2016 #12
he would stomp all over hillary in the general election. bowens43 Jan 2016 #7
The birthers will take care of Ted mdbl Jan 2016 #8
Ted Cruz isn't ready to be mulch rpannier Jan 2016 #9
Not to defend Cruz Cary Jan 2016 #10
"The radical left is worse"??? Please proceed - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #19
Oh I will. Cary Jan 2016 #20
Please regale us with stories of the last time the KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #21
That's not how I measured it Cary Jan 2016 #26
I'm taking issue with your original assertion that the radical left "is worse" (presumably KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #27
Ignore. SammyWinstonJack Jan 2016 #25
Carnival Cruz is a joke Gothmog Jan 2016 #16
Oh please LiberalElite Jan 2016 #17

freedom fighter jh

(1,782 posts)
1. If he thinks Hillary would do a number on Cruz,
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 07:52 AM
Jan 2016

I wonder what he thinks Bernie would do.

Sometimes these Republicans, even the more open minded among them, simplify things too much.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
2. When Lindsay Graham dropped out of the race it left
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:08 AM
Jan 2016

The GOP without a credible candidate on foreign policy. Graham is very good on foreign policy and could have challenged Hillary on foreign policy. Agree with Graham saying Cruz is lacking and yes Hillary would do a number on Cruz. We need a strong foreign policy president.

Cassiopeia

(2,603 posts)
6. For the same reason we now call it the defense department
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:56 AM
Jan 2016

instead of the war department.

It gives the illusion that we have a positive roll to play.

daleanime

(17,796 posts)
24. I disagree with him on that....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 03:16 PM
Jan 2016

but Hillary's view on the subject is even worst then Bernie's.

So we know a spot where I disagree with Bernie, where do you disagree with Hillary?

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
13. Lindsey's a nativist ethnophobic nationalist warmonger.
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jan 2016

Good on foreign policy? A man like that should only be allowed in the Oval Office under the observation given visitors. Agree Hillary would do a number on Cruz and Trump, and she may get a chance.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
14. I was talking about his foreign police knowledge, what decisions he would make may not fit
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 11:13 AM
Jan 2016

many people's ideas but it does not diminish his knowledge of foreign policy.

TNNurse

(6,929 posts)
4. I did not think a photo
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 08:48 AM
Jan 2016

could make him look worse.....but that one does jut that. I always thought his smirk was the worst but this one appears...oh, what is the word?? Simple minded comes to mind.

And yes, I know we should not judge someone by their appearance but he and the guy with the funny hair (I refuse to type his name) are just too tempting. Please forgive me for my shallow opinion.

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
12. No one should be judged by their face or physical appearance, but....
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 10:14 AM
Jan 2016

when that person proves to be a total dickwad, all bets are off.

rpannier

(24,338 posts)
9. Ted Cruz isn't ready to be mulch
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:20 AM
Jan 2016

Much less President of the USA
I can't think of much he is qualified for
I guess grifter and huckster are what he's over-qualified for

Cary

(11,746 posts)
10. Not to defend Cruz
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 09:33 AM
Jan 2016

But what is Lindsey Graham ready for?

Did he manage to get 1%?

The Republicans are a mess, and their radical right is dangerous. This is what happens when you allow radicals into your party. The radical right is toxic.

The radical left is worse but fortunately radical leftists aren't Democrats. We don't need them.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
21. Please regale us with stories of the last time the
Sat Jan 9, 2016, 12:47 PM
Jan 2016

radical left seized government facilities under force of arms.

Cary

(11,746 posts)
26. That's not how I measured it
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 12:56 AM
Jan 2016

Criminal acts are a different animal. I am referring to politics.

There is no segment of the political spectrum as reviled as the radical left, in my opinion. And there is also no segment that is less relevant.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
27. I'm taking issue with your original assertion that the radical left "is worse" (presumably
Sun Jan 10, 2016, 01:13 AM
Jan 2016

Last edited Sun Jan 10, 2016, 10:09 AM - Edit history (1)

than the radical right), an assertion for which you have supplied neither evidence nor support. So, as I said, please proceed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Frankly, he isn't ready ...