Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPoliticians Use North Korea H-Bomb Fears to Pitch Wasteful Missile Defense Projects
(The Intercept) Republican politicians responded almost reflexively to the North Korean nuclear test on Tuesday by demanding more spending on missile defense programs that have historically proved ineffective at preventing an enemy strike but are built by companies that have lavished policymakers with campaign cash and political support.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., released a statement calling for the country to reinvest in missile defense and our military presence in the Pacific. Rep. Mike Rogers, R-Ala., called for Obama to dramatically enhance trilateral missile defense and declared that Obama should deploy a Lockheed Martin missile defense system in South Korea. Raytheon and Lockheed Martin are among his top donors. Rep. Mac Thornberry, R-Texas, issued a statement specifically calling for spending on that same program; Lockheed Martin is by far his biggest donor over the course of his congressional career.
Since the early 1990s, politicians of both parties have cited the threat of North Korea to demand funding for an array of missile defense programs that quickly became monumental examples of government waste. Meanwhile, the contractors involved in these projects, including Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Raytheon, among others, have manipulated the politics around these programs by funding politicians, pundits, think tanks, and lobbyists behind the never-ending spiral of taxpayer spending. ..............(more)
https://theintercept.com/2016/01/06/north-korea-missile-waste/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 785 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Politicians Use North Korea H-Bomb Fears to Pitch Wasteful Missile Defense Projects (Original Post)
marmar
Jan 2016
OP
Yield estimates based upon magnitude readings put the NK blast at about 10 kilotons.
MohRokTah
Jan 2016
#1
MohRokTah
(15,429 posts)1. Yield estimates based upon magnitude readings put the NK blast at about 10 kilotons.
This shows the North Koreans have perfected the smallest bombs possible with standard fission techniques. 10 kilotons is the size of a Hiroshima device.
It was definitely NOT a thermonuclear device. The North Koreans do not have a hydrogen bomb.
hunter
(38,312 posts)3. They may not even have a working atomic bomb.
It could've been another dud, or a fraud.
LongTomH
(8,636 posts)2. Conservative organizations like the Heritage Foundation have been pushing missile defense......
......for decades. General Daniel O' Graham caused a furor during the Reagan administration with his version of "layered missile defense."
There's a backstory to Danny Graham, 'Team B' and attempts to heat up the Cold War that Rachel Maddow covered in her book: Drift: The Unmooring of American Military Power.