General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIf these ranchers plan to stay for "years" then how about a siege? It seems like a good solution.
There are people, including news writers on the web, who don't know what a siege is. Some reports even state that the ranchers themselves have staged a siege, which makes no sense. Google defines a siege as "a military operation in which enemy forces surround a town or building, cutting off essential supplies, with the aim of compelling the surrender of those inside."
To me this seems like the ideal solution here. Just declare the area restricted federal land and cut off all civilian access from outside. Then wait until they surrender out of sheer hunger.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)The blm could bus tourists up there to watch the re enactment.
RKP5637
(67,112 posts)spanone
(135,857 posts)Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Signals, lock the gate and throw away the key. Hope the love each other.
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)on edit: they're protesting the conviction of a couple of their pals.
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)I'd hate losing access to that rather wonderful little facility, but if it takes care of these assclowns without bloodshed, it's worth it.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)out of in-fighting.
Imagine that refuge HQ as something like GDP. Nothing to do but complain about the plan and to argue with each other about whose plan should be considered the next best plan.
Oh my...
grossproffit
(5,591 posts)hey kid, wanna build a wall?
[img][/img]
pa28
(6,145 posts)No firebombing necessary.
longship
(40,416 posts)Drive them all nucking futs!
csziggy
(34,136 posts)But I love the idea!
Vinca
(50,300 posts)they'll throw in the towel fairly soon. There's no way they could have mysteriously stockpiled enough wood too keep a fire going to keep themselves warm through the winter. Either come out or freeze to death. Their choice.