General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMSNBC head admits massive Trump coverage is because of ratings
Over the last few months, viewers of MSNBC have noticed a shift in the network's direction. Moving to more of a traditional news format with less liberal opinionated shows, MSNBC has opened its umbrella for potential new viewers, but has alienated those who have been loyal over the years.
Since the start of the summer, popular names like Ed Schultz have been released from the network, while others like Al Sharpton have been switched to different time slots, and limited in their contribution. Leading into their left-leaning prime time programming, executives at MSNBC decided to it would be beneficial to broadcast more unbiased news coverage to tinker with the network's image. As Mediaite reported on Dec. 24, NBC and MSNBC News Chairman Andrew Lack gave the reason for the change, including why Republican front runner Donald Trump is receiving so much attention.
"Had we not made this turn to breaking news with seriousness of purpose, in these times and in this election," Lack said to The Daily Beast in a recent interview, admitting, "we would have been clobbered." Pointing out that the network had been struggling to keep pace with rivals Fox News and CNN is not shocking, but it does come as a surprise for an executive to openly admit it. Lack then turned his attention to Trump, who he says is receiving so much airtime because he is impacting the election in a "profound" way and is doing well in the polls.
more
http://www.examiner.com/article/msnbc-head-gives-shocking-reason-for-network-s-24-7-donald-trump-coverage
grasswire
(50,130 posts)"released from the network"
"seriousness of purpose" -- means more Chuck Todd?
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)JonathanRackham
(1,604 posts)They'd cover a school bus crash at a RR crossing for attention for ratings.
Wounded Bear
(58,699 posts)polichick
(37,152 posts)But no, then voters would share the same facts - they'd know who their REAL enemies are and pick up their pitchforks.
SusanCalvin
(6,592 posts)icymist
(15,888 posts)eom
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)This is no shock.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)<iframe width="560" height="315" src="
" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>And was told but, but, but... never mind.
For the record, kitty up the tree guaranteed click bait, story on local infrastructure, not so much. So it is not just the networks... but also what the public wants.
lancer78
(1,495 posts)Is now the most destructive force in America today. The less we listen to it and respect it, the better off we all will be.