Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 03:31 PM Dec 2015

I am so sick of anti-choice bullshit.

Every time I turn around or look at the news another state has a restriction for contraception or abortion. I thought Roe v. Wade was the law of the country.

Am I wrong? WTF am I missing here?

Every woman in this country should access to contraception and abortion.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am so sick of anti-choice bullshit. (Original Post) Kath1 Dec 2015 OP
Yes - All Woman Should - However - The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Need The Next cantbeserious Dec 2015 #1
Excellent point. Kath1 Dec 2015 #3
Spare us the Sanders commercial. He has asked voters to "set aside" their concerns about abortion. bettyellen Dec 2015 #11
??? MH1 Dec 2015 #17
that oligarch shit has nothing to do with women's reproductive rights and I'm fed up bettyellen Dec 2015 #18
Ah, got you. Thanks for the info and link. nt. MH1 Dec 2015 #24
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ still_one Dec 2015 #26
That was at Liberty University. KamaAina Dec 2015 #36
Hillary is a much stronger supporter of women's reproductive rights... bettyellen Dec 2015 #39
He really said that? Jim Beard Dec 2015 #30
At least twice. Once to a group of Firemen (I guess he thought they were anti- choice( bettyellen Dec 2015 #35
The ruling let states decide how to interpret R vs W yeoman6987 Dec 2015 #2
Thank you. Kath1 Dec 2015 #4
I posted this at another OP, about the conservative mental splitting that is going on. TheBlackAdder Dec 2015 #5
Thank you. Kath1 Dec 2015 #6
Its more to do with religious beliefs than anything else Iliyah Dec 2015 #7
I think it has a lot to do with punishment and redemption, too loyalsister Dec 2015 #13
I agree 100% Omaha Steve Dec 2015 #8
imagine the outrage if they treated guns the same way Skittles Dec 2015 #9
Same here. Kath1 Dec 2015 #14
They actually have the same legal status. NutmegYankee Dec 2015 #19
helps to be batshit insane Skittles Dec 2015 #33
Religion. NutmegYankee Dec 2015 #34
Take another look at Nutmeg's statement... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #41
It's going to get worse. leftyladyfrommo Dec 2015 #10
Yes. Kath1 Dec 2015 #15
Not if I can help it. n/t MeNMyVolt Dec 2015 #23
shout the bastards down dembotoz Dec 2015 #12
Agree 100% Kath1 Dec 2015 #16
After Roe v Wade, kiva Dec 2015 #20
Any woman who wants an abortion should have access. Kath1 Dec 2015 #21
Second that statement. kiva Dec 2015 #22
It is no one's business but the woman and her health care provider. Kath1 Dec 2015 #29
I remember that, and you are right still_one Dec 2015 #28
I would call that "forced Religion" Jim Beard Dec 2015 #31
K&R smirkymonkey Dec 2015 #25
and anyone who values the right of a woman to choose, and believes it is an important issue still_one Dec 2015 #27
K&R ismnotwasm Dec 2015 #32
My suggestion for a bumper sticker, If you're not pro-choice, joeybee12 Dec 2015 #37
yep. and this is.. one_voice Dec 2015 #38
Gains have to be defended. The FR is an implaccable foe with boundless energy... Eleanors38 Dec 2015 #40
Anti-choice crazies are the true threat to a civil society. kairos12 Dec 2015 #42

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
1. Yes - All Woman Should - However - The Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks Need The Next
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 03:34 PM
Dec 2015

Generation of poor proles to work in American sweatshop jobs.

No better way to grow one's workforce than denying contraception to women.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
11. Spare us the Sanders commercial. He has asked voters to "set aside" their concerns about abortion.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 06:06 PM
Dec 2015

Embarrassing.

MH1

(17,600 posts)
17. ???
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:16 PM
Dec 2015

Sure that one is a Sanders partisan but not sure how you got "Sanders commercial" from his statement.

Do you have a link to Sanders' "set aside" comment? I think I have heard that but would like to remind myself.

I am definitely not willing to "set aside" either women's rights or other important issues.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
18. that oligarch shit has nothing to do with women's reproductive rights and I'm fed up
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:36 PM
Dec 2015

with people who never advocate for women's reproductive rights telling me that *everyone* earning more money is some sort of magic that will restore our autonomy. The truth is, they see us as an annoying "wedge issue" that should be swept under the rug. Sanders has said as much himself, first addressing a group of fire fighters, and then later with Christina students. Why he needed to go there with firefighters is beyond me. Cannot find that link here, but here is the one from the last time he asked people to look past the fight for women's rights.



http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/video/2015/sep/14/bernie-sanders-christian-university-inequality-video

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
36. That was at Liberty University.
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 04:08 PM
Dec 2015

What would Hillary say at Liberty University, if she had the guts to go there in the first place?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
39. Hillary is a much stronger supporter of women's reproductive rights...
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 04:12 PM
Dec 2015

And I don't think it takes guts to pander to RW nut jobs.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
35. At least twice. Once to a group of Firemen (I guess he thought they were anti- choice(
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 03:52 PM
Dec 2015

And once to that college - link above.
Its disturbing.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. The ruling let states decide how to interpret R vs W
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 03:36 PM
Dec 2015

So since Democratic Party runs about 19 states, you will see differences in the other 31 states. That's why we really are not winning anything except the presidency.

TheBlackAdder

(28,201 posts)
5. I posted this at another OP, about the conservative mental splitting that is going on.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 03:51 PM
Dec 2015

I guess Texas doesn't care what it costs. Two forced births cost taxpayers $720,000.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1038&pid=2958



This is a perplexing dichotomy, where you have people aligning with the New Conservative movement, clashing with their Libertarian core values, and those Libertarian values will rise again, once the damage is done to their state.

Those who can afford birth control and abortions will get them, while those of limited means might get pregnant and be forced to bring that pregnancy to term.

===

With the average cost to the state's taxpayers, anywhere between $17,500 - $18,500 per year, to educate them through their school years, and the addition costs to provide for daycare services, WIC, SNAP, medicare, school lunches, housing, food stamps, etc.. that many of these deliveries incur. Texas will be on the verge of an economic collapse in the next 20 years.

The approximated costs of a child is abound $18,000 per year, until they reach emancipation.

That results in that $360,000 amount per child. A few years ago, Perry cut back on abortion a few years back, which resulted in 7K more births, or $124 Million a year for Texas taxpayers for 18 years. He immediately reversed that after just one year.

===

Imagine if there are even more births each year, and that continues for 18 years, by the time the 18th year passes, and all grades have extra and un-projected additional children in them, Texas taxpayers will be on the hook for another $3 Billion in state and local taxes. (And that is each and every year!)

At some point, the Libertarian strain of their beings will overpower their zealotry--but that might be well after the fiscal damage is done.

===

It seems like progressives are not using Libertarian positions against the GOP's fiscal responsibility. I don't know if that because they don't want to seem callous about abortion, placing a price on a 'life' that even the bible states is not a person until delivered and taking of first breath.



.

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
6. Thank you.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 03:57 PM
Dec 2015

I had access to contraception and i am thankful for that.

My daughter, with her job and my support, will ALWAYS have access for contraception or abortion.

It is so unfair that poor women won't. This needs to change.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
7. Its more to do with religious beliefs than anything else
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 04:15 PM
Dec 2015

and women in their eyes truly are subject to lesser rights and decisions than their male counter-part.

Contraception and abortion has an ominous meaning to them. They believe in "Be fruitful and multiply" or else. Which level has become an extreme hatred for anyone who is pro-choice.

loyalsister

(13,390 posts)
13. I think it has a lot to do with punishment and redemption, too
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 08:47 PM
Dec 2015

Punishment for premarital sex, being a good seed propogator, and she is rewarded with the joy of motherhood.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
19. They actually have the same legal status.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:42 PM
Dec 2015

Both are decided as rights, but with restrictions allowed. The key aspect in such a scenario is political will to protect the right. We have done a shitty job on access to abortion.

NutmegYankee

(16,199 posts)
34. Religion.
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 01:11 AM
Dec 2015

Even when the book of your faith says nothing on the topic. If anything Exodus 21:22 demonstrates that the fetus doesn't have the same legal status as the mother.

"22“If people are fighting and hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely(e) but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined whatever the woman’s husband demands and the court allows. 23But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life, 24eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, 25burn for burn, wound for wound, bruise for bruise."

e 22 Or she has a miscarriage
 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
41. Take another look at Nutmeg's statement...
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 04:30 PM
Dec 2015

The Party is edging away from any meaningful opposition to wrecking Roe v Wade.

They would rather mumble something about gun-control and pretend they aren't getting their teeth knocked down their throats bynthat issue -- often by the same folks who are targeting womens rights.

Any consultant for the GOPers should return their six-figure fees: the job is getting done for them for free.

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
15. Yes.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 08:53 PM
Dec 2015

It seems like we are.

Contraception stops unwanted pregnancy and abortion stops unwanted birth.

Both are legal.

kiva

(4,373 posts)
20. After Roe v Wade,
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 09:55 PM
Dec 2015

we saw a huge shift in social opinion about "unwed mothers" - the most polite term that was used then. Many churches began welcoming single parents, high schools stopped kicking out expectant mothers, people started saying that they were the good girls because they didn't have abortions.

I believe that if abortion becomes illegal, the pendulum will swing back and unmarried women who get pregnant will again be targets of abuse and criticized as immoral.

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
21. Any woman who wants an abortion should have access.
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:04 PM
Dec 2015

Social opinion is pro-choice.

Thanks, kiva.

Kath1

(4,309 posts)
29. It is no one's business but the woman and her health care provider.
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 12:05 AM
Dec 2015

Birth control pills are great. I loved them. IUDs, uncomfortable but yes. Condoms? not a big fan but been there.

There is no reason, outside of some religious dogma, that women do not have unrestricted access to contraption and abortion.

At 57, I'll never need it. But my daughter might need it!

still_one

(92,190 posts)
27. and anyone who values the right of a woman to choose, and believes it is an important issue
Sun Dec 20, 2015, 10:57 PM
Dec 2015

will vote for the Democratic nominee in the general election, because yes, the Supreme Court does matter, and all one needs to do is look at the justices appointed by Democrats verses the ones appointed by republicans


 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
37. My suggestion for a bumper sticker, If you're not pro-choice,
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 04:08 PM
Dec 2015

then you can't be pro-life.

We need to take away the pro-life label from the anti-choice tools.

 

Eleanors38

(18,318 posts)
40. Gains have to be defended. The FR is an implaccable foe with boundless energy...
Mon Dec 21, 2015, 04:22 PM
Dec 2015

But their biggest advantage is:

No Opposition.

Look at our own Party and its actions and statements from its various "leaders." Oh, you might get a press release, or a transcript from an address, but a womans right to choose ain't on the front burner. Not by a long shot.














But you hear a lotta huff-duff about gun control.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I am so sick of anti-choi...