Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,287 posts)
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 01:26 PM Dec 2015

Chris Christie claims he’s tight with King Hussein of Jordan, who’s been dead for sixteen years

Someone mentioned the “King of Jordan” during the republican debate for no apparent reason, and the rest of the candidates then felt the need to one-up each other by claiming that they considered the King of Jordan to be an even bigger priority, or that they were the most likely to win him over. The trouble: it seemed clear that none of them knew who the King of Jordan was. Finally, Chris Christie stepped up with the answer, claiming he would have the best rapport with “King Hussein of Jordan.” Except that King Hussein is deceased and has been for a long time.

It’s not clear why any of the candidates was trying to make Jordan a central focus of the conversation, other than none of them knowing why he was brought up to begin with, and none of them wanting to be the one who didn’t mention him just in case he was important. Except it was clear that none of them knew the man’s name. That game of chicken finally went awry when Christie guessed “Hussein” and would have been correct if this were 1999.

It perhaps wasn’t a bad roll of the dice for Chris Christie, whose poll numbers are so low he barely gained entry into the debate to begin with. He’s already lost, so he has nothing to lose. But when you claim you’re the one who has enough knowledge of a region to win over the King, and then you name a King who died sixteen years ago… then again, it’s not as if any of the republicans watching this debate at home knew (or cared) about the difference.

http://www.dailynewsbin.com/opinion/chris-christie-claims-hes-tight-with-king-hussein-of-jordan-whos-been-dead-for-sixteen-years/23267/

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Christie claims he’s tight with King Hussein of Jordan, who’s been dead for sixteen years (Original Post) TexasTowelie Dec 2015 OP
Maybe the king got wedged between Christie's cheeks. Xipe Totec Dec 2015 #1
Fat joke, how classy. What is wrong with you? Nt Logical Dec 2015 #3
Yawn trumad Dec 2015 #6
I am sure DU members are overweight also. It is insulting. Nt Logical Dec 2015 #9
I hear he's also best buds with Generalissimo Francisco Franco pinboy3niner Dec 2015 #2
Well that dates me-- TexasTowelie Dec 2015 #4
Al least he'd be in company he's comfortable with DFW Dec 2015 #12
He sees dead people!!! (nt) jeff47 Dec 2015 #5
+1 Johonny Dec 2015 #7
Its Christie's world, it must not be the one we live in. Thinkingabout Dec 2015 #8
Oh, come on. You know he meant Saddam Hussein. KamaAina Dec 2015 #10
Chris Christie for Necromancer! 0rganism Dec 2015 #11

DFW

(54,414 posts)
12. Al least he'd be in company he's comfortable with
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 03:19 PM
Dec 2015

King Hussein at least was a decent guy in an impossible situation.

Of course, no one called Christie on his stupid mistake. Of course, this was an all-Republican crowd--no one else present knew that Hussein died 16 years ago, either.

0rganism

(23,959 posts)
11. Chris Christie for Necromancer!
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 03:17 PM
Dec 2015

(? ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)?━☆゚・ 。゚・ 。゚・ 。゚・ 。゚・ 。゚・ ヽ༼◕ل͜◕༽ノ

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Christie claims he’...