Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 01:09 AM Dec 2015

GOP debate audience excited by prospect of killing noncombatants and innocents

Link to full article at Kos

It all started when the best question of the night came from Facebook: A student from Georgia Tech called Donald Trump on his suggestion that he would kill family members of ISIS in order to deter terrorists from attacking us. "So my question is: How does intentionally killing innocent civilians set us apart from ISIS?"

No surprise here, Trump doubled down: "I would be very very firm with families. And frankly, that will make people think. Because they may not care much about their lives, but they do care, believe it or not, about their family's lives."

And ... you guessed it: the audience broke into applause.

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GOP debate audience excited by prospect of killing noncombatants and innocents (Original Post) Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2015 OP
This makes me sick. Not just that they could say such outrageous bs, but that so many people support uppityperson Dec 2015 #1
The Mike Corleone philosophy of foreign policy. Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2015 #2
It is amazing that so many support this crap, it makes me fear for the future uppityperson Dec 2015 #3
Me too! Nt newfie11 Dec 2015 #5
More like the FDR-Truman philosophy. former9thward Dec 2015 #11
Actually, that was less true early in the war Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2015 #12
If you are going to fight a war nothing is off limits. former9thward Dec 2015 #13
You are right, and that's a big part of the problem. Algernon Moncrieff Dec 2015 #14
Republicans' only problem with ISI mindwalker_i Dec 2015 #4
And yet, he never answered the question. Cracklin Charlie Dec 2015 #6
So heartless! And yet, ask them and most of them will claim to be Christians. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #7
Some of the sickest Old Codger Dec 2015 #8
Most countries have treatment programs for their mentally ill. We put ours on TV. Scuba Dec 2015 #9
That's the 'pro-life' party. rec. nt. Mc Mike Dec 2015 #10

uppityperson

(115,677 posts)
1. This makes me sick. Not just that they could say such outrageous bs, but that so many people support
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 01:14 AM
Dec 2015

this outrageous bs. This is sickening.

former9thward

(32,030 posts)
11. More like the FDR-Truman philosophy.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 08:59 PM
Dec 2015

They bombed non-military civilian areas of Germany and Japan to demoralize the German and Japanese militaries who wee losing their families in those bombs.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
12. Actually, that was less true early in the war
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 04:14 AM
Dec 2015

In Europe, Britain went with the de-housing philosophy and indiscriminate bombing of targets in Germany/German occupied territories, while the US favored precision daylight bombing of industrial and military targets. However, by late in the war, when we were bombing Japan, we went more wholeheartedly after civilian populations. I'd add that Germany engaged in indiscriminate bombing of civilian populations as well, and Japan tried to start random mayhem in the US with incendiary balloons that failed miserably.

However, what Trump is talking about is having intelligence agents do the kind of things that drug cartels do -- determine the identities of individuals in ISIS/ISIL/Daesh/whatever we call it this week; determining who the loved ones of those individuals are, and targeting them directly with death or torture.

former9thward

(32,030 posts)
13. If you are going to fight a war nothing is off limits.
Thu Dec 17, 2015, 04:10 PM
Dec 2015

That was the American, UK, German and Japanese philosophy in WW II. I don't favor any intervention in the Middle East, ISIS or otherwise, but if someone wants to kill U.S. familes then I have no problem killing theirs.

Algernon Moncrieff

(5,790 posts)
14. You are right, and that's a big part of the problem.
Fri Dec 18, 2015, 01:03 AM
Dec 2015

Let me establish at the outset: you and I are in 100% agreement re: "any intervention in the Middle East, ISIS or otherwise"

Since Gulf War I, we have not fought any war with clear-cut territorial conquest objectives. We've taken sides in civil wars -- some of which we instigated, others not (Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan). We accomplished regime change in Iraq, botched the occupation, and ended up with Civil War.

In a certain sense, I agree with you. In war, nothing is off limits. However, the object has to be for one side to impose its will over the other. Would engaging in gangsterism accomplish that? Possibly, but what I think it really accomplishes it guaranteeing more terrorism. The way to fight ISIS, IMO, is to cut them off from their sources of funding. That means driving them out of the oil and antiquities business; that means cutting off "donations" from wealthy citizens of erstwhile allies; and -- if it comes to it -- it means scorching the earth in their occupied territories.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
7. So heartless! And yet, ask them and most of them will claim to be Christians.
Wed Dec 16, 2015, 01:54 AM
Dec 2015

What sets them apart from ISIS?

Very good question.

I don't want to think that people really feel like that.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP debate audience excit...