General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsQuestion about Freddie Gray trials
Why are they trying all the cops separately?
Why not have one giant trial and get the whole thing over with?
It seems like the malfeasance on the part of the cops was collective, and by breaking it up, it's easier for each of the officers to put forth a defense that his or her individual actions contributed to Freddie's death, but not at the level of criminal wrongdoing.
Porter's either going to walk or he's going to have a new trial, and since the next trial is scheduled to start on January 6, instead of being the first one to get a verdict, he may well be the last one.
The DA has screwed this up royally.
firebrand80
(2,760 posts)Most times a Defendant doesn't want to take the risk that he'll be lumped in the with actions of others.
Ms. Yertle
(466 posts)I believe that is up to the judge.
The judicial system is weighted in favor of the defendant. It's the whole idea of "fair trial."
Princess Turandot
(4,787 posts)The prosecutors asked for two trials involving three defendants each. The defense requested separate trials. The judge granted their motion.
From WAPO in September...
But the judge saw it differently, saying that the officers could be unfairly tainted if jurors were shown evidence related primarily to their colleagues actions.
Prosecutors declined to predict what effect the ruling would have on the case. Its unknown precisely what evidence they will present at each trial.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/crime/for-officers-charged-in-freddie-gray-case-separate-trials-are-better/2015/09/05/49783ff0-531f-11e5-9812-92d5948a40f8_story.html
The defendants also wanted the trials moved from B'more but the judge denied that motion a few days later.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)If convicted, they'll likely be offered pre-sentencing deals to roll over on the later defendants.