General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBrave Lady’s Guns Seized For Shooting Into Crowd, How Is That Even Fair?
holding out for a hero
Brave Ladys Guns Seized For Shooting Into Crowd, How Is That Even Fair?
image:
he's just trying to help
Pop quiz: You are at your local Home Depot, hating your life because you are at your local Home Depot, when you see some loss prevention officers chasing down someone that stoled a thing from your local Home Depot. Do you:
Do nothing, because the loss prevention people are on it?
Put your leg out and trip the fleeing person as if you are in a bad sitcom?
Shoot them.
If you said (3), you are a proud Second Amendment-lovin Michigan-American and a goddamn hero, even if the judicial system just doesnt understand.
Tatiana Duva-Rodriguez, who was licensed to carry a concealed weapon, said she heard a scream and feared the incident was worse than a theft. She acknowledged the shooting in the parking lot was a mistake. I made a decision in a split second, the 46-year-old Clarkston woman told a judge. Maybe it was not the right one, but I was trying to help.
. . . . .
Wed like to say it is a truth we hold self-evident that shooting INTO A CROWD OF PEOPLE is not typically how we help people, but we live in America so everything about guns is completely broken. Proof positive: this lady got probation. Probation. PROBATION. FOR SHOOTING INTO A CROWD OF PEOPLE AT YOUR LOCAL HOME DEPOT.
. . . . .
Thank god that although this sharpshooter lady only got probation, it at least comes with grabbin her guns away until 2023. Does this mean shes learned her lesson and will now be all safe about guns and such? Nope.
I tried to help, and I learned my lesson that I will never help anybody again, she said after her sentencing.
Well, since your definition of help includes shoot into a crowd, were pretty cool with you removing yourself from the pool of helpers, lady.
Read more at http://wonkette.com/596864/brave-ladys-guns-seized-for-shooting-into-crowd-how-is-that-even-fair#eC7sZi1TWqE6Qspo.99
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)We defined responsibility and good person different where I grew up.
niyad
(113,513 posts)SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)Because if you don't put your leg out and trip the fleeing person, they could kill your Uncle Ben, and it's hard to be Spider-Man without being bitten by a radioactive spider, and you don't look that good in Spandex anyway.
cwydro
(51,308 posts)Probation is ridiculous though.
A miracle she didn't kill or critically injure someone.
Buzz Clik
(38,437 posts)So, if she shot into a crowd of people at someone suspected of stealing a roll of duct tape, then she made the correct decision.
PERIOD! END OF DISCUSSION!!!!111
napi21
(45,806 posts)I'm sure MOST people would "TRY TO HELP", as we see replays of Shootout at OK Corral every day. I shudder when I hear someone say everyone in that movie theater should have been armed. Just imagine 60-100 people shooting at what they perceived to be the threat IN THE DARK!
treestar
(82,383 posts)There would be as many mistakes as saves.
napi21
(45,806 posts)I think MOST of the injured would be other well intentioned citizens and during such a melee', the criminals would get away.
mwrguy
(3,245 posts)this is your queen
niyad
(113,513 posts)again. a totally clueless twit.
sarisataka
(18,733 posts)Is my choice.
I will not try and trip the running person. Loss prevention is not law enforcement and I do not know why they are chasing the runner. For all I know they may have some issue with the person and want to beat him.
I won't be shooting anyone until myself or a family member is facing a threat of grave bodily harm.