General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsScalia Better Off in “Less Advanced” Court
...from The Borowitz Report:
According to the study, Scalias struggles to perform his duties in a competent fashion stem from his being inappropriately placed on a court that is too demanding for a person of his limited abilities.
Forcing Justice Scalia to weigh in on complex legal issues that he lacks the background or aptitude to comprehend is, at the end of the day, cruel, the study said.
The legal scholars theorized that Scalia would be more likely to thrive in a lesser court where he does not feel that he is being pushed to hear cases that are too challenging for him.
If Scalia were reassigned to a slow track institution such as a town traffic court, that would be better for everyone, the study recommended.
Seems to me his arguments are best suited to a kangaroo court:
A kangaroo court is a judicial tribunal or assembly that blatantly disregards recognized standards of law or justice, and often carries little or no official standing in the territory within which it resides. Merriam-Webster defines it as a "mock court in which the principles of law and justice are disregarded or perverted". The term may also apply to a court held by a legitimate judicial authority who intentionally disregards the court's legal or ethical obligations.
longship
(40,416 posts)Well done, Borowitz. Sometimes ridicule is the only appropriate response. Andy regular gets to the core of issues by ridiculing them.
The Onion also accomplishes this same high art.
I hold both of them in very high esteem.
R&
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and increasingly erratic statements over the past 3 years or so that have most observers seriously questioning his competence. He's pushing 80.
BTW, there's more than one direction incompetence can come from. This Supreme Court Justice is a science denier. Speaking at his granddaughter's graduation: Class of 2015, you should not leave Stone Ridge High School thinking that you face challenges that are at all, in any important sense, unprecedented. Humanity has been around for at least some 5,000 years or so, and I doubt that the basic challenges as confronted are any worse now, or alas even much different, from what they ever were.
ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)He is much more suited for the Spanish Inquisition or some 3rd-world dictatorship.
Gothmog
(145,374 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Dont call me Shirley
(10,998 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)Octafish
(55,745 posts)A real fixer upper, that fascist.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Was right.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Again.
Good.