General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKareem Abdul-Jabbar: What Donald Trump and ISIS Have in Common
TIME columnist Abdul-Jabbar is a six-time NBA champion and league Most Valuable Player. He is also a celebrated author, filmmaker and education ambassador whose life and career are the subject of Minority of One, a new documentary on HBO Sports.The 2016 candidate has more in common with the terrorist group than he does with America
The terrorist campaign against American ideals is winning. Fear is rampant. Gun sales are soaring. Hate crimes are increasing. Bearded hipsters are being mistaken for Muslims. And 83 percent of voters believe a large-scale terrorist attack is likely here in the near future. Some Americans are now so afraid that they are willing to trade in the sacred beliefs that define America for some vague promises of security from the very people who are spreading the terror. Go ahead and burn the Constitution just dont hurt me at the mall. Thats how effective this terrorism is.
Im not talking about ISIS. Im talking about Donald Trump.
This is not hyperbole. Not a metaphor. Webster defines terrorism as the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal; the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion.
If violence can be an abstraction and it can; thats what a threat is the Trump campaign meets this definition. Thus, Trump is ISISs greatest triumph: the perfect Manchurian Candidate who, instead of offering specific and realistic policies, preys on the fears of the public, doing ISISs job for them. Even fellow Republican Jeb Bush acknowledged Trumps goal is to manipulate peoples angst and fears.
more
http://time.com/4143003/kareem-abdul-jabbar-donald-trump-isis/?xid=homepage
Initech
(100,087 posts)longship
(40,416 posts)I love Jabbar! Here's his sole acting role.
cojoel
(957 posts)You might want to check out his listing on imdb. http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0000717/?ref_=nv_sr_1
saturnsring
(1,832 posts). Go ahead and burn the Constitution just dont hurt me at the mall. Thats how effective this terrorism is.
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Violence is violence; speech is speech.
padfun
(1,786 posts)What if I just speak to a person and tell them that a specific person needs to die.
And then they go and kill that person.
I am legally liable for a murder charge, even if I only spoke and didn't kill anyone.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)Incitement to crime is, and should be, illegal (although it's important to draw the distinction between deliberately inciting crime and saying things likely to result in crime).
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)And haven't quite come to a conclusion personally. Violence is an abstract noun. And the presence of violence certainly can be felt, even when the violence isn't against your own person. Yes, it is other emotions it evokes, but they wouldn't be felt without the presence of violence or the threat of violence. I'm leaning towards abstraction, but I could be persuaded away from that with a persuasive argument.