Yesterday there were three gunman...

[peace13]

...today it seems there were only two. Yesterday there was a gunman that rolled out of the car and had been apprehended. Now there is zero talk of the third gunman rolling from the car. What happened? I find this hard to comprehend.

The fact that the media said the individual that rolled from the car was apprehended makes me wonder who picked this individual up and why is there no further discussion about it.

[ileus]

1. Yesterday they were also white....I think the names have been changed to protect the guilty.

Can't have America thinking White Christians are attacking now can we.

[leftynyc]

7. You honestly think

they shot this husband and wife as patsies? What about the witnesses - several of whom I saw interviewed last night - that did call the shooter dark skinned. Are we to ignore them or just take what people hear in the first few hours of a rapidly moving situation as gospel?

[2pooped2pop]

2. he's probably one of theirs.

not saying I believe that but I would not doubt it if it came out.

[-none]

3. An FBI sting that went sideways?

The 3rd guy being an undercover agent? Wouldn't be the first time.

[peace13]

8. After seeing infiltrators being hauled out of 'riots' and recovered by the police...

...one has to wonder. We have had so many white shooters and some in this country have been needing a shooter to be nonwhite. This thing is pretty messy all the way around yet so convenient in the end.

[snooper2]

14. there is a forum called creative speculation where people get to talk about made up shit

[flamin lib]

4. As in all 'breaking news' the 24/7 coverage repeats EVERYTHING with or without

verification. Believe nothing now and give it a day or longer for real information to emerge.

[RussBLib]

6. seriously

I try not to watch or listen to the "Breaking News" crap as it is often wrong and just filling time.

Wait a day or more for the "truth" to emerge, and I use the term "truth" with trepidation.

[peace13]

11. I try not to watch as well..

... But yesterday I did because footage tends to disappear and all eyes matter. In the past witnesses have turned out to be associates of political figures.
Ballistics will tell how many guns were shot. The fact that the police weren't there will make that job easy.

[Wounded Bear]

5. I always expect changes in reported 'facts'...

during an on-going incident. I try to refrain from much comment until I know more.

I know, it's not the American, Internet way, but I find I lie less when I do that.

The abject sensationalism that passes for journalism these days really sucks.

[Agnosticsherbet]

9. NBC repored last night that the person 'detained" had nothing to do with the crime.

In an evolving situation where reports and repeats everything constantly, some of the detail get lost.

[peace13]

10. So no one rolled out of the car......

And there were only two shooters. I guess ballistics would confirm that.

[Agnosticsherbet]

13. A lot of information in the early stages of an investigatin is false.

that is the 24/7/365 coverage.

[DrDan]

12. interviewed and released