General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFormer head of US special forces admits: Islamic State would not exist if Bush didn’t invade Iraq
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/11/former-head-of-us-special-forces-admits-islamic-state-would-not-exist-if-bush-didnt-invade-iraq/Former head of US special forces admits: Islamic State would not exist if Bush didnt invade Iraq
Travis Gettys
30 Nov 2015 at 09:59 ET
The former commander of U.S. special forces in Afghanistan and Iraq admitted that strategic blunders by the Bush administration had led to the rise of Islamic State militants.
Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn told the German newspaper Der Spiegel that Americans allowed their anger of the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks to lead them into disastrous military policies that failed to address the root causes of terrorism and actually helped create new and more brutal terrorists.
The misunderstanding was so great that Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, who now heads ISIS, was freed in 2004 from a military prison after a U.S. military commission cleared him as harmless.
We were too dumb, Flynn said. We didnt understand who we had there at that moment. When 9/11 occurred, all the emotions took over, and our response was, Where did those bastards come from? Lets go kill them. Lets go get them. Instead of asking why they attacked us, we asked where they came from. Then we strategically marched in the wrong direction.
The U.S. invaded Iraq after administration officials including George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Colin Powell presented false intelligence about Saddam Husseins weapons of mass destruction and alleged links to al-Qaeda.
snip//
It was huge error, he continued. As brutal as Saddam Hussein was, it was a mistake to just eliminate him. The same is true for Moammar Gadhafi and for Libya, which is now a failed state. The historic lesson is that it was a strategic failure to go into Iraq. History will not be and should not be kind with that decision.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)geardaddy
(24,931 posts)They are spot on.
LittleGirl
(8,287 posts)HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)In case anyone's memory lapses.
underpants
(182,826 posts)2naSalit
(86,646 posts)billhicks76
(5,082 posts)Hillarys war. Oh wait she also voted for and promoted the Iraq War.
Hekate
(90,713 posts)She did vote with the majority -- but there is no need to embellish her record with flat out lies.
billhicks76
(5,082 posts)tblue37
(65,393 posts)From Kos:
"A golden oldie: Hillary's floor speech to invade Iraq" - Daily Kos.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/12/435624/-&ved=0ahUKEwj2q9njz7rJAhVD4iYKHdXEBcEQFggvMAU&usg=AFQjCNGw-SVfuAkVb5zuvNwGpLvDSJQwyw
A video of her complete floor speech supporting the IWR:
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=&ved=0ahUKEwj2q9njz7rJAhVD4iYKHdXEBcEQiE4IJDAB&usg=AFQjCNF1sHlk2z9QIx28jtvfnGP_UlkifA
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)ANYONE.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,350 posts)GWB's daddy started the war with Iraq. Junior only tried to finish it. If GHWB didn't start Desert Shield / Desert Storm, there would be no ISIS.
napkinz
(17,199 posts)Botany
(70,515 posts)Paul Bremer disbanded the Iraqi Army (mostly Sunni) and sent them home
with no jobs but with some of their weapons too and some of them went on
to become al Qaeda in Iraq which morphed into ISIS. However our "liberal
media" and the republican party are busy trying to blame President Obama's
bad intel for the rise of ISIS.
That poor little Syrian boy on the beach in Turkey, the Russian passenger plane
that was blown up, the 100s of thousands of refugees from the middle east trying
to escape ISIS, the terrorists that attacked Paris, and so many more cases that all
can be traced back to w & Cheney's war in Iraq.
http://time.com/3900753/isis-iraq-syria-army-united-states-military/
patsimp
(915 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)And making rich people richer is all that matters in the world.
tecelote
(5,122 posts)jalan48
(13,869 posts)I believe this has always been about making money off of war. After the fall of the Soviet Union we needed a new "bad guy" to scare Americans into supporting obscene military budgets. This religious war should play out and pay out for a long, long time.
Botany
(70,515 posts)erronis
(15,288 posts)jwirr
(39,215 posts)volstork
(5,401 posts)the Soviet Union was significantly less of a threat than it was made out to be in the West. They could barely feed their own people. We just needed a boogyman and they were the obvious choice.
BeanMusical
(4,389 posts)About the end of the cold war and what it meant for the MIC and the spy agencies. One expert basically said the same thing as you just did about needing another boogeyman and added that the spy agencies would turn on us (well, far more than they already were).
Wounded Bear
(58,662 posts)of today's "No shit, Sherlock!" award.
Duval
(4,280 posts)it would have made a difference in the outcome. Yes, "It was huge error". We knew that here on DU.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Arrest Bush, Cheney, and the rest of the gang and drop them into the heart of ISIS with the understanding that all violence ceases. Tell them they can do whatever they wish with the Bushistas; just stop the killing and maiming.
I'm sick and tired of all this!!!
erronis
(15,288 posts)replace with compliant US puppets?
I guess our memory doesn't span more than a few months, or news cycles.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)toppled.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)shipped a big chunk of the Nazi power structure to the US after WW II and seeded them throughout the Deep State/Permanent Government.
Nazi Germany won the war against the US. Because Dulles and the oligarchs wanted just that result.
AgingAmerican
(12,958 posts)It was an opportunity to steal oil.
lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)for election fraud and enabling a war criminal.
Omaha Steve
(99,656 posts)OS
Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Flynn's just talking out of his ass now...
Just because the "good" Libyans were too slow to effectively take control in the power vacuum doesn't mean it was a bad decision...
Gaddafi should have been taken out ages ago...
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)WHERE they came from??
They certainly didn't come from Iraq, and Bushco's decision to invade Iraq had nothing to do with that question.
The Bush neocons were intent on invading Iraq prior to 9/11, and they took advantage of the New Pearl Harbor to implement their pre-existing agenda.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)My point being the Bush administration's decision to invade Iraq was not based on where the terrorists who attacked us on 9/11 came from.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)being responsible for ISIS?
They also were criminally negligent when warned about Osama Bin Laden,
Rex
(65,616 posts)That is where 'it all started', shhhhhh don't let that other fella know. Evidently all terrorism started in the ME. We can just forget all the centuries of the Spanish Inquisition for that matter or any other act of terrorism.
It started in 1972 for people that don't know any history, I guess what other conclusion is there?
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)ideology, politics, geography, etc.
ProfessorGAC
(65,060 posts). . .going the wrong way to cap off his "where did they come from" comment? Maybe he meant that we didn't ask why, we didn't ask how it could be prevented, we just asked "where" and then still went to the wrong place.
Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)Also not entirely sure who he means by "We."
However, he is spot-on about our actions giving rise to Daesh (isis).
SHRED
(28,136 posts)The ones who supported this invasion.
They have bloody hands also.
SomeGuyInEagan
(1,515 posts)Most of the "We" I knew personally at the time were outraged at what happened on 9/11 but wanted some real answers. Several of us "treasonous" Americans were personally attacked for asking for that. The media beat the drum of war, including class one assholes like Chris Matthews and shouted down anyone asking questions.
Don't even get me started on how much BS this is ... "We"? "WE"?!!! Fuck you, general!
underpants
(182,826 posts)We tried to tell them.
SunSeeker
(51,564 posts)Democat
(11,617 posts)The headline blames Bush, but the text also mentions Muammar Gaddafi.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Like Safari Club and the off-the-books Friends of CIA, they never really go away.
FairWinds
(1,717 posts)fifteen percent of Americans were still opposed to the invasion
when it was launched.
What gets me most of all is that Dubya/Cheney/etc. did not
even bother to come up with plausible lies, and they still got away
with it.
I'm still furious at the Amer Pol Sci Assoc (I used to belong) for
not speaking out . .
2naSalit
(86,646 posts)The rest is posturing to protect the official story line.
>>>>We were too dumb, Flynn said. We didnt understand who we had there at that moment. When 9/11 occurred, all the emotions took over, and our response was, Where did those bastards come from? Lets go kill them. Lets go get them. Instead of asking why they attacked us, we asked where they came from. Then we strategically marched in the wrong direction.
The U.S. invaded Iraq after administration officials including George W. Bush, Dick Cheney and Colin Powell presented false intelligence about Saddam Husseins weapons of mass destruction and alleged links to al-Qaeda.
Horsepucky, they knew exactly who was where and from where. I will never buy the BS line that guy is putting out there. If he and his charge didn't know, somebody was misleading them for a long time, which I don't accept completely thought the secrecy was pretty tight with that little clan who occupied the WH back then.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Illegal. Immoral. Unnecessary. Disastrous. Something.
world wide wally
(21,744 posts)But I think I heard a teenage girl telling Jeb(!) about this a few months ago, and I have heard friends mention it over a year ago.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)The other half is probably not something the majority of DU is willing to accept just yet.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Saudi Arabia. But that fact will never be acknowledged.
Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)... apparently it is okay to sponsor attacks on us IF you also do a little business with us too. Asshats!
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)avaistheone1
(14,626 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)Too bad the war mongerers are not going to be held accountable for the quagmire they have caused in the Middle East. Worst even, they are not taking responsibility for their criminal acts.
prouddemfromaustin44
(52 posts)He and his cronies have the blood of countless innocents on their hands. It's just so unfair how he gets to walk free, unlike his victims.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)this (the headline) strikes me as a bit simplistic and not exactly what Flynn is saying. Although I do realize it makes use of the current liberal meme that the US is responsible for everything bad in the world. The newest form of American exceptionalism.
malaise
(269,030 posts)for the truth
Justice
(7,188 posts)He was THERE!
He was AT THE TABLE!
He could have spoken out when it mattered.
Easy to speak out now.
d_legendary1
(2,586 posts)had he outed the Warshrub administration. A lot of people who came clean ended up dead at the time.
raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)oh right. Iron Curtain.
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)$1 note: Dubya!
$5 note: Rummy
$10 note: Condi
$20 note: Darth Cheney.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Not that it will make any difference going forward.
The destruction of 2+ generations will not be easily remedied by our continued blundering.
Tipperary
(6,930 posts)(of course, I do not mean you.)
These idiots. Cheney should be tried for war crimes.