General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"no more baby parts"--said dear as he was led away. but people continue to scramble to find
some other explanation for his murdering rampage. the man is a homegrown, white, domestic terrorist.
90-percent
(6,829 posts)There seems to be a complete blackout about his possible motives by the local authorities. Why would they do such a thing?
-90% Jimmy
niyad
(113,315 posts)all, fundieville, home of fungus (aka focus on the family) and new life, and the religious academy known as the afa.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Focus on the Family's headquarters is there. Ted Haggard's super-evangelical megachurch is there. And there's been massive effort to turn the Air Force Academy into an evangelical factory.
So the local authorities are either true believers, or dependent on the true believers to stay in office.
niyad
(113,315 posts)phantom power
(25,966 posts)If a black man shot a cop and said fuck the police while being arrested, would we have to wait to figure out his motivations?
But if a crazy loner gun nut shoots a bunch of people in front of a planned parenthood, carrying explosive devices with him, and states No more baby parts, which JUST SO FUCKING HAPPENS to be rhetoric tossed around by right to lifers the past few months, and its a GIANT FUCKING RIDDLE what his motivations might have been. Its a real fucking whodunit. Lemme guess, you probably think Dr. Tillers killer just had a thing against lab coats.
May he have said a number of other things? Sure. Crazy people say all sorts of crazy shit. But you cant deny where he was and what he said. Its not a riddle. Its the result of calculated rhetoric that is DESIGNED to encourage this kind of behavior.
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2015/11/29/its-a-giant-fucking-mystery-wrapped-inside-a-riddle-inside-an-enigma/
Marty McGraw
(1,024 posts)Beyond BogglesVille
mreilly
(2,120 posts)1. Insist it's the "pro-abortion culture of death" that caused this tragedy, never them or their rhetoric of course.
2. Moan and whine they're being "picked on" by haters who are wrongfully blaming the anti-choice crowd for it's rhetoric
They get a two-fer - pointing fingers and playing the victim, both of which these creeps just love.
Rinse and repeat.
niyad
(113,315 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)niyad
(113,315 posts)in south carolina and the dump in hartsel.
valerief
(53,235 posts)Location, location, location!
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)Let's start calling them cowards.
valerief
(53,235 posts)terrorists but all Christian terrorists are RW.
marew
(1,588 posts)"EARLIER this month, in Des Moines, the prominent home-schooling advocate and pastor Kevin Swanson again called for the punishment of homosexuality by death."
"Mr. Swanson proposed this at the National Religious Liberties Conference, an event he organized. Featured speakers included three Republican contenders for the presidency: the former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, Gov. Bobby Jindal of Louisiana and Senator Ted Cruz of Texas."
"Mr. Cruz apparently felt little need to make excuses. He was accompanying another of the featured speakers at the conference: his father, Rafael Cruz a politically connected pastor who told a 2013 Family Leadership Summit that same-sex marriage was a government plot to destroy the family."
What the hell is going on? I am not gay, never had an abortion, etc. But this abject hatred for others is dangerous crazy talk!
Still waiting to hear how Jebbie is going to test people to make sure only christians are allowed into the country. I came from a very religious family- studied scripture under the Jesuits in college. But the older I got and the more greed and hypocrisy I saw, I became an atheist! Anyone who acted like that in my name would be "smited" down in seconds! "God" either can't or won't. Neither is acceptable.
The GOP welcomed these crazies into their party. Now these mentally-challenged bozos are a problem! Duh!
Rex
(65,616 posts)It was pathetic and still is. His motive is very clear, he wanted to blow up a PP building. It speaks VOLUMES about this country that authorities are doing everything they can to downplay his reasons.
The M$M is of course going along with it too, "we have no idea why he did this, just a lone gunman folks, move along nothing to see here."
niyad
(113,315 posts)the comments on the local "news" sites was absolutely sickening.
Rex
(65,616 posts)I already know what the replies are going to be, seeing them will just piss me off and raise my blood pressure.
niyad
(113,315 posts)yes, I know that it didn't do any good, but it did serve to sharpen my claws.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Venting is a good way of releasing pent up frustration. I release tension by lifting free weights.
niyad
(113,315 posts)wrapping around someone's neck.
If only everyone had that worldview, we would not have any wars and far less murders imo.
LiberalArkie
(15,715 posts)that makes them question that belief, strange things happen. Either the event did not happen, or it was not because of the belief. There always has to be another reason.
Same with politics. Many on the right can not except that trickle down economics won't work. Even when the person who came up with the idea says it's trash and when it has been proven time after time that it doesn't work.
How far did the believers in John Edwards go to defend him?
How far did the believers that Bill Clinton did not do the deed go to try and rationalize it?
Belief is a strange thing.
malthaussen
(17,199 posts)... but I wonder why it matters. There seems to be a great need to label, categorize, and pigeonhole actions. But what inevitably occurs, it seems to me, is that if an inconvenient label does get applied, then society accommodates the action to expediency, as with, e.g., "enhanced interrogation." True, in some jurisdictions there are special laws against hate crimes (which from a legal standpoint are begging to be overthrown, as they require a jury to have the wisdom to determine intent). I find it baffling. If I kill you for your purse, or because I hate women, or because I hate you in particular, you are still as dead. Why should my motive make one killing more abhorrent than another? Each motive is equally selfish, and equally a denial of your right to exist.
-- Mal
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)"Why should my motive make one killing more abhorrent than another? "
Do you apply that consistently to all crimes? If not, what are the specific and relevant differences between the crimes you apply it to and those you do not?
If so, what then is the specific and relevant denominator in the sentencing that the starving man, after stealing bread to survive, and the man who steals food for entertainment or profit? (As indeed, "Each motive is equally selfish..."
malthaussen
(17,199 posts)But answering the question with a question, while good rabbinical technique, doesn't answer the question. Back atcha: what are the specific and relevant denominators that make one crime more abhorrent to another? I'm not looking to score debate points, but to enlighten my understanding: why do some (possibly you) consider one sort of crime worse than another? Perhaps if the question were posed less deterministically: why would my motive matter, rather than why should?
-- Mal
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)I'm yet awaiting the answer as to whether sentencing should be applied consistently regardless of motive.
If it's too clear, I empathize.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)A murder to steal a purse only means value your life more than your purse if given the chance. It will cause no-one to stop carrying means of payment.
A murder aimed at a women's reproductive health facility means that people will be far more reluctant to work at or support them. It is a crime with a larger and more political effect, as intended.
malthaussen
(17,199 posts)Answers the question of why it is different in nature from a single-victim crime, and why it threatens society more. Thanks for the answer!
-- Mal
MisterP
(23,730 posts)SHRED
(28,136 posts)niyad
(113,315 posts)spanone
(135,838 posts)i just read this:
http://www.cnn.com/2015/11/29/us/colorado-planned-parenthood-shooting/index.html
niyad
(113,315 posts)uppityperson
(115,677 posts)I waited for PP's announcement, now have no trouble calling it terrorism.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)niyad
(113,315 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Heard it on FOX "News".
niyad
(113,315 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)chervilant
(8,267 posts)that the worse things get for our species, the more a definable subset of us wrap themselves in the bible and the flag? AND, that this definable subset wants ALL of us to be wrapped in the bible and the flag?
I am gobsmacked by these pitiable fear-mongering, hate-mongering people.
niyad
(113,315 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)We are apes, and behave as such when stressed and propagandized via the deliberate and designed manipulations of the tenth-percenters.
Someday we'll live on Venus, men will walk on Mars
But we will still be monkeys down deep inside
If chimpanzees are smart then we will close our eyes
And let our instincts guide us, oh oh oh oh no
- David Byrne
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)niyad
(113,315 posts)struggle4progress
(118,285 posts)He certainly could have been influenced by rightwing talk radio or some similar strain of the constant ugly BS that runs through our society
There's also a good chance that he really is just bonkers
The possibilities aren't mutually exclusive
He seems to have been living an increasingly isolated life for almost twenty years now, with limited and often strange interactions with neighbors, indicating odd beliefs such as you-need-a-metal-roof-so-the-government-can't-spy-on-you
Six kids lost a parent because of him. Two of his dead victims were simply providing moral support to friends going to PP; the third was a pro-life cop called as back-up to the shooting scene
niyad
(113,315 posts)and vitriol. we have to expose them for exactly what they are.