Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 07:43 PM Nov 2015

"Terror attacks renew calls for '28 pages' release," by Sharyl Attkisson

Source: Sinclair Broadcast Group

Fourteen years after Sept. 11, 2001, one of the last, great mysteries surrounding the terrorist attacks has yet to be unmasked: 28 pages from the Congressional probe that have been kept secret from the public under two U.S. administrations. The pages were classified under the George W. Bush administration -- and are still hidden from public view today under President Obama. In the wake of recent terrorist attacks, claimed by ISIS, there are bipartisan calls to make the 28 pages public. There are also accusations that those who want to keep them classified aren't protecting national security interests, but something--or somebody--else.

... But who are they? And why would the U.S. government want to keep the information secret?

Former Senator Bob Graham thinks he knows. He co-authored the Congressional report, including the 28 pages.

In a news conference earlier this year, Graham said, "Here are some facts. The Saudis know what they did. Second, the Saudis know that we know what they did."

Read more: http://kutv.com/news/connect-to-congress/interviews/full-measure-terror-attacks-renew-calls-for-28-pages-release

[hr]
Some background on Sinclair: http://www.firstamendmentcenter.org/sinclair-network-to-run-anti-kerry-film-democrats-object

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Terror attacks renew calls for '28 pages' release," by Sharyl Attkisson (Original Post) Newsjock Nov 2015 OP
k & r & thanks! n/t wildbilln864 Nov 2015 #1
In other words it names hifiguy Nov 2015 #2
Ding. Ding. Ding. forest444 Nov 2015 #6
K&r tk2kewl Nov 2015 #3
Thanks for posting Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #4
I'd be inclined to say declassify the pages bluestateguy Nov 2015 #5
KICK! hifiguy Nov 2015 #7
Sharyl Attkisson and Sinclair trying to dig up the truth?! KamaAina Nov 2015 #8
But, Repub Rand Paul and Dem Ron Wyden Already Called for the Release of the 28 Pages! KoKo Nov 2015 #9
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
2. In other words it names
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 08:27 PM
Nov 2015

who in the government of KSA knew it was going to happen ahead of time or actively facilitated/financed the attack. Or, more likely, both.

Saudi Arabia is one of the true loci of evil in the world in addition to being, without question, the worst country and the worst culture on the planet.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
5. I'd be inclined to say declassify the pages
Sun Nov 29, 2015, 09:51 PM
Nov 2015

but since I refuse to ever agree with Sheryl Atkinson, my position is keep the pages classified.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
9. But, Repub Rand Paul and Dem Ron Wyden Already Called for the Release of the 28 Pages!
Mon Nov 30, 2015, 09:05 PM
Nov 2015

Rand Paul and Ron Wyden to call for release of redacted 9/11 report

By Adam B. Lerner

05/29/15 12:47 PM EDT

Sens. Rand Paul and Ron Wyden are teaming up to call for the public release of 28 classified pages from a 2002 intelligence report on the 9/11 attacks — pages that have taken on near-totemic significance for many who believe the U.S. government has yet to fully reveal what it knows about the 2001 assault on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.

The Kentucky Republican’s office confirmed that it had secured the Oregon Democrat as a co-sponsor of the Transparency for the Families of 9/11 Victims Act, which Paul will discuss at a press conference Tuesday alongside supporters of a version of the measure in the House of Representatives, Congressmen Walter Jones (R-N.C.), Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.).

They will also be joined by former Sen. Bob Graham (D-Fla.) who chaired the committee that issued the report and has long agitated for its full release, often darkly hinting at its contents.

“The 28 pages primarily relate to who financed 9/11, and they point a very strong finger at Saudi Arabia as being the principal financier,” Graham has said.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/redacted-911-report-rand-paul-ron-wyden-118413

----------------
What a new Iraq 'surge' could look like

MICHAEL CROWLEY

Saudi Arabia has denied those accusations, and has joined calls for the redacted information’s release.

The issue of the 28 pages has come up again and again since the report on intelligence failures that failed to prevent al Qaeda’s attacks was released in 2002. Issued separately from the 9/11 commission report, the Joint Inquiry Into Intelligence Community Activities Before and After the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 report contained a section on intelligence surrounding foreign backing of the attackers.

In 2003, 11 Democratic senators sent a letter to President George W. Bush mentioning what information the redacted pages might yield: “It has been widely reported in the press that the foreign sources referred to in this portion of the Joint Inquiry analysis reside primarily in Saudi Arabia.”

Bush refused, citing the need to protect “sources and methods” needed to fight terrorism.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/redacted-911-report-rand-paul-ron-wyden-118413

-------
Rand Paul's money problem

ALEX ISENSTADT

More recently, lawyers representing the families of victims killed in the 9/11 attacks have demanded the report’s full release as part of their lawsuit against the Saudi government, and a former al Qaeda operative — Zacarius Moussaui — testified earlier this year that top members of the Saudi royal family had supported the terrorist organization.

Many national security experts have dismissed such claims, but after reading the pages, Rep. Massie said in a July 2014 press conference that he found the section “disturbing” and challenged all other congressmen to examine them.

“I don’t think it would hurt our national security to release this,” he added, “and it would give families the answers they deserve.”

“It’s going to be difficult and it’s going to be embarrassing.”

The decision to declassify the redacted pages would rest with President Barack Obama. White House has said it is reviewing calls for their release, but has provided no update or timetable on that review’s progress.


http://www.politico.com/story/2015/05/redacted-911-report-rand-paul-ron-wyden-118413
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"Terror attacks rene...