Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy Obama Is Standing by the Syrian Refugees
http://readersupportednews.org/opinion2/277-75/33650-focus-why-obama-is-standing-by-the-syrian-refugeesNow, over the past week, hes met the nativist hysteria sparked by the attacks in Paris with an impassioned, enraged rhetorical barrage on behalf of the admission of Syrian refugees. Hes done so even though polls show that a clear majority of Americans now oppose admitting any Syrians. And even though, last Thursday, 47 House Democrats broke with him to help overwhelmingly pass a bill that would make admission of Syrian refugees virtually impossible.
Nonetheless, Obama has been unyielding. Last Monday from Turkey he went after Ted Cruz, declaring that, When I hear political leaders suggesting that there would be a religious test for which person whos fleeing from a war-torn country is admitted when some of those folks themselves come from families who benefitted from protection when they were fleeing political persecution, thats shameful. Thats not American. On Tuesday in the Philippines, Obama targeted Chris Christie for being worried about three-year-old orphans. That doesnt sound very tough to me. On Wednesday he fired off six straight tweets on the subject, the last of which declared that, Slamming the door in the face of refugees would betray our deepest values. Thats not who we are. And its not what we're going to do. Then, after meeting refugee children on Saturday in Malaysia, he declared that, American leadership is us caring about people who have been forgotten or who have been discriminated against or whove been tortured or whove been subject to unspeakable violence or whove been separated from families at very young ages. Thats when were the shining light on the hill.
Why is Obama picking a fight on an issue that, according to The Washington Posts Chris Cillizza, is a political winner for the GOP?
Because of the way he interprets American history.
Obama tells the story of American history differently: as America overcoming the evil within itself. In his 2008 Democratic convention speech, he talked about a promise that has led immigrants to cross oceans and pioneers to travel west, a promise that led workers to picket lines and women to reach for the ballot. The first two referencesto immigrants escaping foreign oppression and pioneers overcoming natures hardshipsare standard political fare. But by twinning them with workers battling exploitation and women battling sexism, Obama suggested that external and physical forces arent the only barriers to American progress. Sometimes, the barriers are other Americans.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 530 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Obama Is Standing by the Syrian Refugees (Original Post)
eridani
Nov 2015
OP
pampango
(24,692 posts)1. Nice find, eridani. Here is more from the article.
Obama tells the story of American history differently: as America overcoming the evil within itself. In his 2008 Democratic convention speech, he talked about a promise that has led immigrants to cross oceans and pioneers to travel west, a promise that led workers to picket lines and women to reach for the ballot. The first two referencesto immigrants escaping foreign oppression and pioneers overcoming natures hardshipsare standard political fare. But by twinning them with workers battling exploitation and women battling sexism, Obama suggested that external and physical forces arent the only barriers to American progress. Sometimes, the barriers are other Americans.
Its a theme that recurs in Obamas speeches. In his first inaugural, he said Americas greatness resided in those Americans who traveled across oceans in search of a new life ... settled the West ... and plowed the hard earth but also those who toiled in sweatshops and endured the lash of the whip. In other words, America achieved greatness because Americans seeking dignity and freedom triumphed over Americans who sought to deny them those things. In Obamas second inaugural he talked about the star that guides us toward full equality, just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls, and Selma, and Stonewall. This March, on the 50th anniversary of the march from Selma to Montgomery, he said what occurred there was a clash of wills; a contest to determine the true meaning of America.
Obviously, Obama knows America faces enemies abroad. But unlike Bush, who took World War II and the Cold War as his precedents for the war on terror and thus cast America as a virtuous nation menaced by foreign malevolence, Obama refers frequently to Americas malevolence within. He sees American history as a series of moral struggles pitting Americans seeking equal opportunity and full citizenship against Americans who defend an unjust or bigoted status quo.
Obama clearly sees the current nativist, bigotry-laden, hysteria as such a struggle. He knows he may not win. But he wants future historians to know exactly where he stood. They will. And as a result, I suspect, theyll record the Syrian refugee battle among his finest hours.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)2. At base Obama's a good, caring man who
does not suffer from the xenophobia that makes so many who think themselves good capable of atrocities.