Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(47,487 posts)
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:22 PM Nov 2015

Many now support sending troops to fight ISIL

From http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-majority-americans-oppose-accepting-syrian-refugees-n465816


Nearly 6 in 10 Americans say the use of overwhelming military force is the best way to defeat terrorism, but this divides along party lines as well. Republicans nearly universally (86%) see military force as the answer, but 60% of Democrats agree with the statement that relying too much on military force creates hatred that leads to more terrorism. Again independents are more divided, with more (55%) saying military force is necessary to defeat terrorism.

Majorities of Americans across all parties support sending additional ground troops to fight ISIS in Iraq and Syria, although Republicans are more hawkish, with 51% in strong support, compared to 20% of Democrats and 31% of independents.

======

What this poll should have included was: do you support the reinstating of the draft?

Do you support you, or a family member joining the military?

I doubt it. Still chickenhawks.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Many now support sending troops to fight ISIL (Original Post) question everything Nov 2015 OP
It's sad there's so much hate in this country scscholar Nov 2015 #1
Something definitely needs to be done about them, BUT hifiguy Nov 2015 #2
Actually, to a good extent it should be... Herman4747 Nov 2015 #10
Unless they volunteer themselves to go PowerToThePeople Nov 2015 #3
Well there you have it. Avalux Nov 2015 #4
It'll be just like how we conquered the Taliban with 14 years of NATO ground troops and a government TwilightGardener Nov 2015 #5
and of course the first beheading KT2000 Nov 2015 #6
We never learn. Paladin Nov 2015 #7
Not much shorter than the memory sharp_stick Nov 2015 #8
The nation is getting duped again Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2015 #9
Christ almighty. Here we go again. bullwinkle428 Nov 2015 #11
Here's what's going to happen when we put ground troops in Syria. bullwinkle428 Nov 2015 #12
They should ask anyone voting yes to articulate how the troops would be used PersonNumber503602 Nov 2015 #13
The irony is that had we not been stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan question everything Nov 2015 #14
The cable news channels are 24/7 terror coverage since Friday. Fear sells. neverforget Nov 2015 #15
Bingo...the f*&^(!g MSM is salivating again at the thought of war. Punkingal Nov 2015 #17
Here we go again. nt ChisolmTrailDem Nov 2015 #16
We've been actively destablizing their host country for four years... killbotfactory Nov 2015 #18
Not a huge fan of the draft, personally; neither was anybody else in with me Recursion Nov 2015 #19
 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
2. Something definitely needs to be done about them, BUT
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:26 PM
Nov 2015

it should be the Russians and the French who do it.

 

Herman4747

(1,825 posts)
10. Actually, to a good extent it should be...
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:07 PM
Nov 2015

...the Iraqis, at least so far as the Islamic State has penetrated Iraq. I do believe that the Iraqi military outnumbers ISIS.

Avalux

(35,015 posts)
4. Well there you have it.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:30 PM
Nov 2015

Fear is a fail proof tool used to persuade the masses to building their own prison, via the media. They want war, and that's exactly where we're headed.

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. It'll be just like how we conquered the Taliban with 14 years of NATO ground troops and a government
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:33 PM
Nov 2015

that was paid for and propped up by us, and will be so into eternity. Total success! Except Assad isn't "our" guy, and ISIS is a little sharper than the Taliban. And the Taliban isn't yet conquered. But otherwise, it'll be great.

KT2000

(20,584 posts)
6. and of course the first beheading
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:33 PM
Nov 2015

of our troops will be blamed on President Obama.
I really do not think those in favor of ground troops will be in favor of what will happen to those "ground troops" who are actually people. It will be played out in videos though.

Paladin

(28,265 posts)
7. We never learn.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:34 PM
Nov 2015

And yes, I reluctantly support the re-introduction of the military draft. The all-volunteer armed forces system is a lynchpin of all the dangerous and expensive adventurism in the Middle East. Until everybody has skin in the game, until the rich are facing the same threat to life and limb as the poor---and yeah, I'm looking at you, Chris Matthews, and your entitled kids---wars are going to be commenced on a whim, and we'll keep making the same fucking mistakes. Enough, already.

sharp_stick

(14,400 posts)
8. Not much shorter than the memory
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 09:59 PM
Nov 2015

of the average American. I wonder how many body bags it would take until they hate this deployment as much as Iraq?

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
12. Here's what's going to happen when we put ground troops in Syria.
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:44 PM
Nov 2015

Assad's forces, ISIS, and the "moderate rebels" will all join forces and try to kill as many American troops as possible.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
13. They should ask anyone voting yes to articulate how the troops would be used
Wed Nov 18, 2015, 10:51 PM
Nov 2015

for how long, and what the long-term goals are.

Sometimes military force is the only way to handle certain situations, but it has to make sense to use. I haven't seen any fleshed out ideas on sending ground troops, and explanations on what their specific goals would be, and how those goals would lead to the ultimate destruction of ISIS.

question everything

(47,487 posts)
14. The irony is that had we not been stuck in Iraq and Afghanistan
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:36 AM
Nov 2015

for so many years and thus lost the appetite for any war, right now might have made sense.

Of course, had we not been stuck in Iraq ISIS may not have occurred...


neverforget

(9,436 posts)
15. The cable news channels are 24/7 terror coverage since Friday. Fear sells.
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:41 AM
Nov 2015

As a species, we're doomed. We never learn.

killbotfactory

(13,566 posts)
18. We've been actively destablizing their host country for four years...
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 12:56 AM
Nov 2015

thankfully, if Kerry is to be believed, we've finally realized enough is enough

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. Not a huge fan of the draft, personally; neither was anybody else in with me
Thu Nov 19, 2015, 01:13 AM
Nov 2015

This came up sometimes in conversation and the most common view was that we none of us wanted to be in a unit with somebody who was conscripted. (And, unlike the Army, the Marines never made any distinction between draftees and enlistees in terms of assignments or uniform.)

This will sound counterintuitive to some DUers, but what I would really like is to change the requirements so that it's easier
1. for poor people and minorities to enlist, and
2. for enlisted people to get commissions

There's this common view that the military is full of people who didn't have any options in the civilian economy, but in fact enlistees are whiter, better educated, and richer than the nation as a whole (the NCO corps is blacker and more Hispanic than the nation as a whole, though, because white people don't stay in the military as long, in general). Essentially all enlistees have a high school diploma or equivalent, vs. about 75% of their cohort, and even minor run-ins with law enforcement can make enlistment difficult in the first place, and make it nearly impossible to get a good job in the military even if you do enlist.

A result of this is that we actually have a situation where the already privileged have more of an opportunity to gain the benefits of military service than the less privileged. The nation is 16% Hispanic, and 12% black, while enlistees are 10% hispanic and 8% black (though the standing military winds up closer to the national figures because, again, white soldiers tend not to stay in as long).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Many now support sending ...