General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMany now support sending troops to fight ISIL
From http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/poll-majority-americans-oppose-accepting-syrian-refugees-n465816
Nearly 6 in 10 Americans say the use of overwhelming military force is the best way to defeat terrorism, but this divides along party lines as well. Republicans nearly universally (86%) see military force as the answer, but 60% of Democrats agree with the statement that relying too much on military force creates hatred that leads to more terrorism. Again independents are more divided, with more (55%) saying military force is necessary to defeat terrorism.
Majorities of Americans across all parties support sending additional ground troops to fight ISIS in Iraq and Syria, although Republicans are more hawkish, with 51% in strong support, compared to 20% of Democrats and 31% of independents.
======
What this poll should have included was: do you support the reinstating of the draft?
Do you support you, or a family member joining the military?
I doubt it. Still chickenhawks.
scscholar
(2,902 posts)So much hate. It is depressing. So depressing.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)it should be the Russians and the French who do it.
Herman4747
(1,825 posts)...the Iraqis, at least so far as the Islamic State has penetrated Iraq. I do believe that the Iraqi military outnumbers ISIS.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)They can stfu.
Avalux
(35,015 posts)Fear is a fail proof tool used to persuade the masses to building their own prison, via the media. They want war, and that's exactly where we're headed.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)that was paid for and propped up by us, and will be so into eternity. Total success! Except Assad isn't "our" guy, and ISIS is a little sharper than the Taliban. And the Taliban isn't yet conquered. But otherwise, it'll be great.
KT2000
(20,584 posts)of our troops will be blamed on President Obama.
I really do not think those in favor of ground troops will be in favor of what will happen to those "ground troops" who are actually people. It will be played out in videos though.
Paladin
(28,265 posts)And yes, I reluctantly support the re-introduction of the military draft. The all-volunteer armed forces system is a lynchpin of all the dangerous and expensive adventurism in the Middle East. Until everybody has skin in the game, until the rich are facing the same threat to life and limb as the poor---and yeah, I'm looking at you, Chris Matthews, and your entitled kids---wars are going to be commenced on a whim, and we'll keep making the same fucking mistakes. Enough, already.
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)of the average American. I wonder how many body bags it would take until they hate this deployment as much as Iraq?
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Time to dust off my "march in the street" shoes, from circa 2002.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)Assad's forces, ISIS, and the "moderate rebels" will all join forces and try to kill as many American troops as possible.
PersonNumber503602
(1,134 posts)for how long, and what the long-term goals are.
Sometimes military force is the only way to handle certain situations, but it has to make sense to use. I haven't seen any fleshed out ideas on sending ground troops, and explanations on what their specific goals would be, and how those goals would lead to the ultimate destruction of ISIS.
question everything
(47,487 posts)for so many years and thus lost the appetite for any war, right now might have made sense.
Of course, had we not been stuck in Iraq ISIS may not have occurred...
neverforget
(9,436 posts)As a species, we're doomed. We never learn.
Punkingal
(9,522 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)killbotfactory
(13,566 posts)thankfully, if Kerry is to be believed, we've finally realized enough is enough
Recursion
(56,582 posts)This came up sometimes in conversation and the most common view was that we none of us wanted to be in a unit with somebody who was conscripted. (And, unlike the Army, the Marines never made any distinction between draftees and enlistees in terms of assignments or uniform.)
This will sound counterintuitive to some DUers, but what I would really like is to change the requirements so that it's easier
1. for poor people and minorities to enlist, and
2. for enlisted people to get commissions
There's this common view that the military is full of people who didn't have any options in the civilian economy, but in fact enlistees are whiter, better educated, and richer than the nation as a whole (the NCO corps is blacker and more Hispanic than the nation as a whole, though, because white people don't stay in the military as long, in general). Essentially all enlistees have a high school diploma or equivalent, vs. about 75% of their cohort, and even minor run-ins with law enforcement can make enlistment difficult in the first place, and make it nearly impossible to get a good job in the military even if you do enlist.
A result of this is that we actually have a situation where the already privileged have more of an opportunity to gain the benefits of military service than the less privileged. The nation is 16% Hispanic, and 12% black, while enlistees are 10% hispanic and 8% black (though the standing military winds up closer to the national figures because, again, white soldiers tend not to stay in as long).