General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChris Matthews Finally Calls A Conservative on the "We Left Iraq Too Soon" Bullshit.
Better late than never, I guess.
Rudi Giuliani: "Obama created ISIS by pulling the troops out of Iraq too soon. Why did we keep all those troops in Germany for 50 years? Why did we..."
Chris Matthews: "To fight the SOVIETS. We didn't keep em there to fight the GERMANS."
Rudi Giuliani: "..erp...derp...9-11, 9-11, 9-11!"
I have to give Chris Matthews credit for being the ONLY MSM pundit who ever calls conservatives on their bullshit tropes every once in awhile. Case in point, the time he called Kevin James on the standard trope about Obama being Neville Chamberlain "APPEASEMENT...blah...blah...blah..." Matthews, for once, actually asked the conservative talker who was dropping the trope what Chamberlain actually DID, and he couldn't answer because he had no clue. That's true of 99% of right wing tropes, but you'd never know it because nobody ever asks them for details. Just dropping the word is enough to get a Pavlovian salivation response. (See video below for that one.)
Well, I've heard every conservative pundit from George Will to John McCain to Charles Krautthammer to Rudi Giuliani repeat the tired trope that Obama pulled the troops out of Iraq 'too soon.' And when somebody asks them the obvious question "How long is long enough? If it didn't happen in 13 years, how long is long enough?" They always answer "How long did we leave troops in GERMANY and JAPAN after WWII?" And not once does anybody ever point out that we didn't leave troops there to keep the GERMANS and the JAPANESE from fighting each other, or continuing to fight us. They were left there to deter the Soviet Union.
Thanks Chris, for being the FIRST talk show host to not that one slide. Better late than never, I guess.
drmeow
(5,024 posts)negotiated by Bush? That's the one I also want them to be called on.
They should be called on that 24/7
Triana
(22,666 posts). . . between bu$h and Iraqi gov't that stated when US withdrew and the new Iraqi gov't took over Iraq, that new Iraqi gov't would also take over running the prisons. They did, and let all the prisoners out. Several articles I've read outline from whence ISIS formed. In no small part, it was birthed in those prisons - and then the prisoners - full of revenge-driven radical extremists - were emptied.
IOW - the way I see this, no matter HOW LONG we stayed in Iraq, the social and economic damage was done by our prior invasion and occupation. Then, our imprisoning and torturing prisoners added fuel to the ISIS fire. Stupidity on top of stupidity from the bu$h admin. This was a hot mess that the US made, but no matter how long they stayed, would be unable to clean up, no matter what. Thank you very little and f*ck you very much GWB, Rumsfeld and Tricky Dick II (Cheney). So here we are.
GOP love to blame Obama for this hot mess but the truth is, the entire mess was created (and agreements made as to who would run the prisons some of what were to become ISIS were detained in) before Obama was President.
I don't buy their blame against Obama. It just doesn't - from all I read - hold water.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
America Created Al-Qaeda and the ISIS Terror Group
The 2003 American invasion and occupation of Iraq created the pre-conditions for radical Sunni groups, like ISIS, to take root. America, rather unwisely, destroyed Saddam Husseins secular state machinery and replaced it with a predominantly Shiite administration. The U.S. occupation caused vast unemployment in Sunni areas, by rejecting socialism and closing down factories in the naive hope that the magical hand of the free market would create jobs. Under the new U.S.-backed Shiite regime, working class Sunnis lost hundreds of thousands of jobs. Unlike the white Afrikaners in South Africa, who were allowed to keep their wealth after regime change, upper class Sunnis were systematically dispossessed of their assets and lost their political influence. Rather than promoting religious integration and unity, American policy in Iraq exacerbated sectarian divisions and created a fertile breading ground for Sunni discontent, from which Al Qaeda in Iraq took root.
LINK: http://www.globalresearch.ca/america-created-al-qaeda-and-the-isis-terror-group/5402881
The above is corroborated here by the ISIS fighters themselves:
. . ."The Americans came," he said. They took away Saddam, but they also took away our security. I didnt like Saddam, we were starving then, but at least we didnt have war. When you came here, the civil war started."
This whole experience has been very familiar indeed to Doug Stone, the American general on the receiving end of this diatribe. "He fits the absolutely typical profile," Stone said afterward.
(It is) exactly the same profile as 80 percent of the prisoners then
and his number-one complaint about the security and against all American forces was the exact same complaint from every single detainee."
These boys came of age under the disastrous American occupation after 2003, in the chaotic and violent Arab part of Iraq, ruled by the viciously sectarian Shia government of Nouri al-Maliki.
They are children of the occupation, many with missing fathers at crucial periods (through jail, death from execution, or fighting in the insurgency), filled with rage against America and their own government. They are not fueled by the idea of an Islamic caliphate without borders; rather, ISIS is the first group since the crushed Al Qaeda to offer these humiliated and enraged young men a way to defend their dignity, family, and tribe. This is
the promise of a way out of their insecure and undignified lives; the promise of living in pride as Iraqi Sunni Arabs, which is not just a religious identity but cultural, tribal, and land-based, too.
Full article: http://www.thenation.com/article/what-i-discovered-from-interviewing-isis-prisoners/
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
AND THEN THERE WERE THE PRISONS ---
Camp Bucca: The US prison that became the birthplace of Isis
In March 2009, in a wind-swept sliver of Iraq, a sense of uncertainty befell the southern town of Garma, home to one of the Iraq Wars most notorious prisons. The sprawling detention center called Camp Bucca, which had detained some of the Iraq Wars most radical jihadists along the Kuwait border, had just freed hundreds of inhabitants. Families rejoiced, anxiously awaiting their sons, brothers and fathers who had been lost to Bucca for years. But a local official fretted.
These men werent planting flowers in a garden, police chief Saad Abbas Mahmoud told The Washington Posts Anthony Shadid, estimating 90 percent of the freed prisoners would soon resume fighting. They werent strolling down the street. This problem is both big and dangerous. And regrettably, the Iraqi government and the authorities dont know how big the problem has become.
Mahmouds assessment of Camp Bucca, which funneled 100,000 detainees through its barracks and closed months later, would prove prescient. The camp now represents an opening chapter in the history of Islamic State many of its leaders, including Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, were incarcerated and likely met there. According to former prison commanders, analysts and soldiers, Camp Bucca provided a unique setting for both prisoner radicalization and inmate collaboration and was formative in the development todays most potent jihadist force.
. . .
... the unique setting at Bucca, which thrust together Saddam Husseins Baathist secularists and Islamic fundamentalists, set the stage for something perhaps worse: collaboration. At the prison, the two seemingly incongruous groups joined to form a union more than a marriage of convenience, Soufan reported.
Soufan found each group offered the other something it lacked. In the ex-Baathists, jihadists found organizational skills and military discipline. In the jihadists, ex-Baathists found purpose. In Bucca, the math changed as ideologies adopted military and bureaucratic traits and as bureaucrats became violent extremists, the Soufan report said.
From the ashes of what former inmates called an al-Qaeda school, rose the Islamic State. Indeed, when those inhabitants freed in 2009 returned to Baghdad, the Post reported, they spoke of two things: their conversion to radicalism and revenge.
LINK: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/camp-bucca-the-us-prison-that-became-the-birthplace-of-isis-9838905.html
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
Isis: the inside story
Baghdadi was a quiet person, said Abu Ahmed. He has a charisma. You could feel that he was someone important. But there were others who were more important. I honestly did not think he would get this far.
Baghdadi also seemed to have a way with his captors. According to Abu Ahmed, and two other men who were jailed at Bucca in 2004, the Americans saw him as a fixer who could solve fractious disputes between competing factions and keep the camp quiet.
But as time went on, every time there was a problem in the camp, he was at the centre of it, Abu Ahmed recalled. He wanted to be the head of the prison and when I look back now, he was using a policy of conquer and divide to get what he wanted, which was status. And it worked. By December 2004, Baghdadi was deemed by his jailers to pose no further risk and his release was authorised.
He was respected very much by the US army, Abu Ahmed said. If he wanted to visit people in another camp he could, but we couldnt. And all the while, a new strategy, which he was leading, was rising under their noses, and that was to build the Islamic State. If there was no American prison in Iraq, there would be no IS now. Bucca was a factory. It made us all. It built our ideology.
LINK: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/dec/11/-sp-isis-the-inside-story
beltanefauve
(1,784 posts)And we left on the Iraqi ' s timetable. They wanted us out.
moondust
(20,006 posts)any SOFA that would allow U.S. troops to stay in Iraq no matter if Bush wanted it or Obama wanted it. Iraq basically became a Shiite client state of Iran thanks to Bushco getting rid of Saddam and installing al-Maliki.
treestar
(82,383 posts)these people are so horrible - don't they care about our young at all? They have no problem with sending them to their deaths.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)They formed in Syria's lawless areas because of the Syrian civil war (which we halfheartedly promoted, sadly), and they're pretty determined. We still have 10,000 or so troops in Afghanistan and ISIS is trying to stir up shit there. It's not a deterrent for them--all it will do is make us stay longer or get more involved. All our minimal troop presence in Iraq would have done in the face of ISIS is make us build our forces back up sooner.