Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Morning Joe has a full NeoCon slate this morning. (Original Post) annabanana Nov 2015 OP
Most DUers are still not asking the obvious questions. CJCRANE Nov 2015 #1
I feel your pain, though Walter Isaacson is holding elias49 Nov 2015 #2
sometimes i do not miss all the channels i used to get dembotoz Nov 2015 #3
Scarborough said they invited Democrats but none wanted to come on, a mistake in my opinion. bklyncowgirl Nov 2015 #4
Well, they probably would not want Wes Clarke on--he is too intelligent for their lot! riversedge Nov 2015 #6
Scar started blaming Obama within 4 minutes of the start of the broadcast here at 6 am. CTyankee Nov 2015 #10
don't let the Republicans rewrite history ... napkinz Nov 2015 #16
don't worry. I will never forget... CTyankee Nov 2015 #18
the problem is the MSM are selling the Republican revision of history that blames President Obama napkinz Nov 2015 #19
and some always will no matter how much correcting information we get out there. CTyankee Nov 2015 #22
I loved it when he said... One of the 99 Nov 2015 #28
McCain and Lindsey coming up riversedge Nov 2015 #5
Lindsey Graham madaboutharry Nov 2015 #7
You mean Douche and Douche? Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2015 #20
Martin O'Malley on CNN now. bklyncowgirl Nov 2015 #8
UGH ! The guy has what, 5% support. Time for him to go - and instead he's on Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2015 #21
In one breath Joe says we have to call this what it is-- "ISLAMIC terrorism." In the next breath... Gidney N Cloyd Nov 2015 #9
and WTF is wrong with "radical jihadist"? We all know what that means... CTyankee Nov 2015 #11
I kind of like radical Islamist cult myself. Jihad has multiple meanings in Islam--not all bad. bklyncowgirl Nov 2015 #14
Someone killed all those people in Paris. If we don't have a name that describes who they are CTyankee Nov 2015 #15
how about 'irregular military'? - nt KingCharlemagne Nov 2015 #23
How about just murderers? Anyone even in the US could buy automatic Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2015 #24
except that there is historical and political context to understand too... CTyankee Nov 2015 #25
Not sure I understand what you are saying. I oversimplified - but I am Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2015 #26
Yes, Obama gets it. Do any of the republicans? CTyankee Nov 2015 #29
No. Guess Paul and Trump come closest...I think:) Makes it SO Laura PourMeADrink Nov 2015 #30
I think we have a shot at the Senate but the House is barbarian...stone age people... CTyankee Nov 2015 #31
Jihadist death cult? bklyncowgirl Nov 2015 #27
They went negative on Obama & Clinton big... Mike Nelson Nov 2015 #12
The same crowd that thought invading Iraq was a good idea.... think Nov 2015 #13
These 5 Facts Show How Decisions By President George W. Bush Led To ISIS napkinz Nov 2015 #17

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
1. Most DUers are still not asking the obvious questions.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:07 AM
Nov 2015

DU is very much behind the curve these days, not like the DU of the Bush era.

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
2. I feel your pain, though Walter Isaacson is holding
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:08 AM
Nov 2015

Scarborough's feet to the fire.
Oh dear...Andrea Mitchell....bye bye.

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
4. Scarborough said they invited Democrats but none wanted to come on, a mistake in my opinion.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 08:22 AM
Nov 2015

If that is true, and of course he could be lying, the Democrats are making a mistake by going into a defensive crouch over this. Some of their guests are making more sense and countering the bluster but a few Democrats with military and intelligence credentials, Wes Clark, for example, would add some heft.

CNN has the Neocon Bobbsey twins, McCain and Graham on. Not much better.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
10. Scar started blaming Obama within 4 minutes of the start of the broadcast here at 6 am.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:06 AM
Nov 2015

I was clocking it to see how soon he would start sticking the knife in.

He musta gotten some pushback from viewers because he started moderating his tone later.

Mika did her smiling smirk usual face when Joe gets going. I was clocking how fast The Face would go up...as soon as Joe started.

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
19. the problem is the MSM are selling the Republican revision of history that blames President Obama
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:08 AM
Nov 2015

for ISIS

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
22. and some always will no matter how much correcting information we get out there.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:12 AM
Nov 2015

Leave them by the wayside and explain to the serious voter, the large group in the middle or lower middle classes.

One of the 99

(2,280 posts)
28. I loved it when he said...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 12:20 PM
Nov 2015

'I don't want to take cheap political shots' and then took a bunch of cheap political shots.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
21. UGH ! The guy has what, 5% support. Time for him to go - and instead he's on
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:09 AM
Nov 2015

TV trashing our probable candidate. Go away Martin

Gidney N Cloyd

(19,838 posts)
9. In one breath Joe says we have to call this what it is-- "ISLAMIC terrorism." In the next breath...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:01 AM
Nov 2015

... he scolds people for calling fear of foreigners and their foreign foreigner ways "xenophobia."

bklyncowgirl

(7,960 posts)
14. I kind of like radical Islamist cult myself. Jihad has multiple meanings in Islam--not all bad.
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:38 AM
Nov 2015

Apparently by living a good Islamic life you are a performing jihad. You also perform Jihad by fighting in defense of the faith. Saying they're a radical cult isolates them.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
15. Someone killed all those people in Paris. If we don't have a name that describes who they are
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:42 AM
Nov 2015

how are we going to understand the context of why they are doing it? How about "murderous jihad"?

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
24. How about just murderers? Anyone even in the US could buy automatic
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:12 AM
Nov 2015

weapons, walk into a crowded venue, and kill a hundred people.

Not a war - a police issue inho

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
25. except that there is historical and political context to understand too...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:15 AM
Nov 2015

the police don't make foreign policy that winds up in out and out murder.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
26. Not sure I understand what you are saying. I oversimplified - but I am
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 11:37 AM
Nov 2015

listening to Obama right now and he is describing what I am thinking very well. It's not a traditional war, not a "traditionally armed" military. We are fighting disillusioned people who are willing to die to kill innocents. They can freely communicate via social media. They are not sitting in a military camp somewhere wearing uniforms that say ISIS.

Sure that probably didn't respond correctly to your point, sorry.

All I do know is that I am SO glad we have Obama in the presidency and know full well if the GOP takes the office - it will make things so much worse.

 

Laura PourMeADrink

(42,770 posts)
30. No. Guess Paul and Trump come closest...I think:) Makes it SO
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 05:17 PM
Nov 2015

important not to let them win the WH and to get the House and/or Senate back.

CTyankee

(63,912 posts)
31. I think we have a shot at the Senate but the House is barbarian...stone age people...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 05:21 PM
Nov 2015

and I also think we have a great shot at the White House with either Hillary or Bernie.

Mike Nelson

(9,958 posts)
12. They went negative on Obama & Clinton big...
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:20 AM
Nov 2015

...and kissed up to Trump and Jeb!, Mika the pseudo-liberal included. "Fox & Friends" is fairer...

napkinz

(17,199 posts)
17. These 5 Facts Show How Decisions By President George W. Bush Led To ISIS
Mon Nov 16, 2015, 10:48 AM
Nov 2015

1. The decision to invade Iraq, which had been contained by the no-fly zone created by the George H.W. Bush and Clinton administrations and unable to threaten its neighbors or the West, created a power vacuum in the Middle East which had been filled by Saddam Hussein until the invasion in March of 2003.

2. The Bush administration believed it could install Ahmed Chalabi – part of the public relations campaign to sell the Iraq War to America – as leader of the new government, but he had been outside of the country so long they never accepted him. He was viewed as a “western stooge.”

3. Almost all of the leaders of ISIS have connections to the former Iraqi government, mostly coming from the military of the Saddam Hussein regime:

-snip-

4. Paul Bremer, who was the appointed head of Iraq by the Bush administration, passed the de-Baathification law which sent Iraqi army members into the populace, eventually becoming insurgents and terrorists:

read more: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2015/11/14/these-5-facts-show-how-decisions-by-president-george-w-bush-led-to-isis/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Morning Joe has a full Ne...