Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 08:45 PM Nov 2015

It was once considered off-limts to criticize the president in the middle of a war


And that second guessing the president would undermine our troops in the field and give aid and comfort to the enemy.

That's what I seem to remember hearing over and over again in the 2000's.



8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

former9thward

(32,012 posts)
4. That rule went out after WW II.
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 09:06 PM
Nov 2015

Truman was criticized with Korea, Johnson and Nixon with Vietnam, Bush and Obama with their various wars. The Gulf war was over too quickly for any criticism of Bush I and I don't consider anything Clinton did in E. Europe, Iraq and Africa to be wars.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
5. When Candidates - Then Presidents - Are The Manifestations Of Oligarchs, Corporations And Banks
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 09:15 PM
Nov 2015

All citizen civility subsides since our voices have been silenced and our wishes neutered by state agency of others.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
6. You mean, "criticizing the president during wartime is treason"?
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 09:27 PM
Nov 2015

Yeah...that shit only plays when you've got a Republican president who is running around invading other countries for the fuck of it. Figure that if Obama actually launches the war the GOTP is salivating for and any of Our Boys In The Trenches get killed, they'll try to impeach him for murdering American servicemembers.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
7. I don't think that was ever the reality. I think that's something one party says if it
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:00 PM
Nov 2015

holds the Oval Office and the other party is being critical.

Democrats sure criticized Dimson enough and pretty much only Republicans complained about criticism during war time.

And, inasmuch as we're now in never-ending war, that rule, if it was really ever honored, is not going to work well for democracy.

Township75

(3,535 posts)
8. So does that mean we can stop the BS about Obama ending any wars?
Sun Nov 15, 2015, 10:24 PM
Nov 2015

Some here seem to think he ended a war or two...or 3, rather than started any new ones.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It was once considered of...