Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

riversedge

(70,240 posts)
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:05 PM Nov 2015

Beer merger will not bring Budweiser, Miller under same roof

good news in my book


http://chippewa.com/ap/business/beer-merger-will-not-bring-budweiser-miller-under-same-roof/article_0d1df331-53fe-5b4c-9b11-b68a04955400.html

Beer merger will not bring Budweiser, Miller under same roof


LONDON (AP) — The world’s two biggest beer makers will join forces to create a company that produces almost a third of the world’s beer. But in the U.S., the deal will not bring arch rivals Budweiser and Miller under the same roof.

Budweiser maker AB InBev announced Wednesday a final agreement to buy SABMiller for $107 billion.

To ease concerns the brewing behemoth might get a stranglehold of the U.S. market, SABMiller will sell its 58 percent stake in a venture with fellow brewer Molson Coors for $12 billion. The deal includes rights to the Miller brand name and gives Molson Coors full control of operations.

For beer drinkers in the Chippewa Valley this means that the Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company is effectively left out of the merger.


The combined company — which as yet does not have a name — will also need to address regulatory issues in China, where SABMiller has a leading position with a 49 percent stake in the Chinese beer Snow. China is the focus of intense interest, as it already drinks a quarter of the world’s beer.

“This combination would create the first truly global brewer,” AB InBev CEO Carlos Brito told reporters in a conference call after the deal, which is set to be completed next year.

AB InBev is seeking to bolster growth by acquiring SABMiller’s businesses in Africa and Asia as changing tastes and the growth of craft beers cut sales in developed markets.....................

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Beer merger will not bring Budweiser, Miller under same roof (Original Post) riversedge Nov 2015 OP
I'm a bit of a beer snob, so Budweiser and Miller don't make the list of brews I call beer. nt Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #1
Exactly - there are far too many excellent American microbreweries out there bullwinkle428 Nov 2015 #3
I liked Blue Moon before it got acquired. Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #9
Blue Moon wasn't acquired DavidDvorkin Nov 2015 #13
Well, you can understand my confusion Xipe Totec Nov 2015 #14
Your confusion DavidDvorkin Nov 2015 #15
I like the mini brews myself-but on a limited budget riversedge Nov 2015 #11
Same here. City Lights Nov 2015 #12
I have no problem with one global brewer having a monopoly on shit beer. MohRokTah Nov 2015 #2
Hubby and I refer to them as canoe beers Maeve Nov 2015 #5
Yep. Red Hook springs to mind HassleCat Nov 2015 #6
Perhaps Sherman A1 Nov 2015 #8
Now I'm curious HassleCat Nov 2015 #4
I like this idea kwolf68 Nov 2015 #7
They can have their global beer, as long as they don't interfere with me drinking local alcibiades_mystery Nov 2015 #10
I drink Newcastle. cwydro Nov 2015 #16
Couldn't care less hifiguy Nov 2015 #17
Whatever happened to the Sherman Act? smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #18

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
3. Exactly - there are far too many excellent American microbreweries out there
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:17 PM
Nov 2015

whose products I consume on a regular basis. I'll drink one of Miller or Budweiser's "specialized" products like Blue Moon or something similar if an establishment has a very limited selection, but that's about it.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
14. Well, you can understand my confusion
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 07:09 PM
Nov 2015

Blue Moon Belgian White is a Belgian-style witbier brewed by Blue Moon Brewing Co. originally in Golden, Colorado, and launched in 1995.

Blue Moon Brewing Co. is an entity of Tenth and Blake Beer Company, the craft and import division of MillerCoors. Originally called Bellyslide Belgian White, it was created by Keith Villa, a brewer at Coors Field's Sandlot Brewery (the onsite brewery owned by the Molson Coors Brewing Company). Blue Moon from the Montreal site is also sold in the USA, as well as exported to Europe.


Blue Moon has come under fire from the Brewers Association for not stating on the bottle that the beer is made by MillerCoors. The Brewers Association says that this omission allows the Blue Moon Brewing Company to masquerade as an independent craft brewer. Independent craft brewers, such as CEO Greg Koch of Stone Brewing Co., agree that the multinational conglomerate brewers' use of bottle imagery similar to independent craft beers misleads consumers. In May 2015, a California man filed suit against MillerCoors for the "Craft Beer" labeling.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Moon_(beer)

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
2. I have no problem with one global brewer having a monopoly on shit beer.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:15 PM
Nov 2015

Makes it easier to identify the shit beers on the shelf.

You just have to watch when the shit beer brewer buys up local artisan brewers, because those beers always turn to shit after the big shit brewers buy them.

Maeve

(42,282 posts)
5. Hubby and I refer to them as canoe beers
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:21 PM
Nov 2015

Because they are like making love in a canoe--f**ing close to water!

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
6. Yep. Red Hook springs to mind
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:25 PM
Nov 2015

I liked Red Hook a lot. Then it was merged with someone and a part interest went to ABInbev. Almost overnight, the beer became swill. They switched to a less expensive method, and it shows. Happens all the time. Rolling Rock is another example.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
8. Perhaps
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:33 PM
Nov 2015

however, as I understand it, one of the reasons to merge was to control supplies of the ingredients which if true could leave many craft beers in a bit of a pickle.

 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
4. Now I'm curious
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:20 PM
Nov 2015

Leinenkugel is owned by SABMiller. How are they not part of the deal? Is Leinie's part of the 58 percent that SABMiller is selling before the merger? I guess that means Leinenkugel will be run by Molson Coors?

kwolf68

(7,365 posts)
7. I like this idea
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:30 PM
Nov 2015

We could eventually end up with a Verizon/Comcast style beer market and what could be better than that?

/sarcasm
 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
10. They can have their global beer, as long as they don't interfere with me drinking local
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:38 PM
Nov 2015

craft beers made within five miles of my house (there are at least four great local breweries so located).

If a dude wants to waste his time in a church, I'm not going to get upset about it, so long as he doesn't try to force my kids to believe his bullshit.

Similarly, if somebody wants to drink Bud or Miller, whatever. It's a bad choice, but it's their choice. Just don't interfere with my choice.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
17. Couldn't care less
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 07:22 PM
Nov 2015

I drink Minnesota-brewed, Minnesota-owned brews when at home





:

and locally brewed beers when I travel elsewhere.

 

smirkymonkey

(63,221 posts)
18. Whatever happened to the Sherman Act?
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 08:19 PM
Nov 2015

It's like it doesn't even exist anymore. Corporations have gotten too big and have too much power. Time to resurrect some good old-fashioned trust busting.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Beer merger will not brin...