Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:00 AM Nov 2015

Wages are too high?

TRUMP: But, taxes too high, wages too high, we’re not going to be able to compete against the world. I hate to say it, but we have to leave it the way it is. People have to go out, they have to work really hard and have to get into that upper stratum. But we can not do this if we are going to compete with the rest of the world. We just can’t do it.




:large

88 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wages are too high? (Original Post) kpete Nov 2015 OP
Wages are not too high Gothmog Nov 2015 #1
Pffft. tazkcmo Nov 2015 #3
Funny how he didn't mention LIVING EXPENSES are too high, too. valerief Nov 2015 #28
Trump has no clue about living expenses. He and LibDemAlways Nov 2015 #41
He's a Trust Fund Baby BuelahWitch Nov 2015 #65
They are if we are expected to compete with Vietnam or Cambodia or India. randys1 Nov 2015 #76
A new requirement- ruffburr Nov 2015 #2
My proposaL tazkcmo Nov 2015 #4
Good Idea- ruffburr Nov 2015 #5
I agree. tazkcmo Nov 2015 #6
Percentage increases maintain the current unfair ratio. Proportional is not progressive. n/t MANative Nov 2015 #8
Better, set congressional pay equal to minimum wage Thav Nov 2015 #12
I like it! tazkcmo Nov 2015 #13
LMAO! ruffburr Nov 2015 #33
+1000000 SammyWinstonJack Nov 2015 #85
Add in the safety net programs to that and we will see a jwirr Nov 2015 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author maddiemom Nov 2015 #36
Hell, let them try living on that "unreasonable" TWELVE or fifteen dollars an hour, maddiemom Nov 2015 #37
wait are you suggesting w0nderer Nov 2015 #52
In a real world this would be a campaign ender underpants Nov 2015 #7
If the Dems have even a single brain cell, they will put this in campaign ads phantom power Nov 2015 #9
Yep underpants Nov 2015 #11
It's no secret that Republicans are for cheap labor! That's B Calm Nov 2015 #10
That's cuz the average working person is being lied to d_legendary1 Nov 2015 #43
It's also hard to swallow they really want to deport all undocumented workers Martin Eden Nov 2015 #87
K&R. Well said. Overseas Nov 2015 #14
$3.70 for a gallon of milk? Much higher at the 'corner store' most 'poor' have to walk to. Sunlei Nov 2015 #15
We really shouldn't help Republicans get rid of Trump.All Rs want no minimum or $7.25 forever. Sunlei Nov 2015 #16
WHY do we have to directly compete with slave labor wages in other parts of the world? WHY? stillwaiting Nov 2015 #17
Good Point! NonMetro Nov 2015 #57
What an ugly ugly man T Rump is!!! OregonBlue Nov 2015 #18
You will never ever win a price war TexasBushwhacker Nov 2015 #19
The new normal for a good economy mountain grammy Nov 2015 #20
All republicans want to get rid of minimum wage. onecaliberal Nov 2015 #21
They have the sheeple convinced... Wounded Bear Nov 2015 #29
It is really difficult for me to believe people could possibly be that stupid. onecaliberal Nov 2015 #80
That fucking meathead. Wages are to high for him... we better damn sure keep him off the payroll. lonestarnot Nov 2015 #22
Trump: Always the voice of greed, arrogance, and over-weened ego. -nt- 99th_Monkey Nov 2015 #23
Anyone who agrees with trade agreements like TPP and NAFTA madville Nov 2015 #24
Allowing American companies to export their labor, offshore their untaxed profits, pay zero taxes at Dustlawyer Nov 2015 #40
Perhaps someone should go out and ask Trump to reconcile this statement he had with this tweet... cascadiance Nov 2015 #55
Precisely. Enthusiast Nov 2015 #71
if minimum wage kept up with productivity elmac Nov 2015 #25
thanks w0nderer Nov 2015 #27
Your welcome elmac Nov 2015 #47
elmac w0nderer Nov 2015 #49
elmac is short for Muti-Elmac elmac Nov 2015 #69
'old timer techie dude'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! w0nderer Nov 2015 #70
Whether they admit it or not elmac Nov 2015 #78
that's why i reverted back w0nderer Nov 2015 #79
Packet was big back in the 80's and 90's elmac Nov 2015 #81
may run that w0nderer Nov 2015 #82
looks up w0nderer Nov 2015 #26
Oh they'll vote for him cause most Americans don't even have half a brain. Cosmic Dancer Nov 2015 #30
Wages!? Too liberal. Alkene Nov 2015 #31
sadly w0nderer Nov 2015 #50
Thank you for your interest in the open position, Mr. Trump Jack Rabbit Nov 2015 #32
We're all supposed to be our own bosses too.... Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2015 #34
Donald needs a cut in pay! Omaha Steve Nov 2015 #35
This was literally completely ignored on debate night. Glad to see this is getting bullwinkle428 Nov 2015 #38
Naturally, for fear scrutiny of inflated pay would turn to CEO's. closeupready Nov 2015 #45
There's even people here on DU against raising minimum wage. hobbit709 Nov 2015 #39
Just "work harder" LastLiberal in PalmSprings Nov 2015 #42
It's funny - when did he last volunteer to lower his own wages? closeupready Nov 2015 #44
i'm ok with a lowering w0nderer Nov 2015 #56
CEO Guy needs a break. moondust Nov 2015 #48
The rent is too damned high! merrily Nov 2015 #51
hmmm too high you say eeeeey? w0nderer Nov 2015 #54
Humor good. Sad bad. merrily Nov 2015 #58
truth w0nderer Nov 2015 #59
You are too kind about my silly posts. merrily Nov 2015 #60
:)) w0nderer Nov 2015 #62
Whatever best does it for you. I'm on your side! merrily Nov 2015 #63
umm ...ummm w0nderer Nov 2015 #64
Unsure. I just love the word. Sounds like a proper hobby/skill for a proper merrily Nov 2015 #66
yay i forced you to learn! w0nderer Nov 2015 #67
I used to learn on DU daily. Now, not so much. merrily Nov 2015 #68
oh merrily :) w0nderer Nov 2015 #72
Word sound snob, even if I have only a passing knowledge of the meaning. merrily Nov 2015 #73
and thus we are in agreement w0nderer Nov 2015 #74
AFAIK, no one can stop you from volunteering for your candidate. merrily Nov 2015 #75
thats a fact w0nderer Nov 2015 #77
I guess then we need to note this to right wingers that support Trump rejecting TPP and H-1B... cascadiance Nov 2015 #53
You need to understand how their base is programmed to process this. trotsky Nov 2015 #61
Only someone who has never worked for a living would say that! grahamhgreen Nov 2015 #83
Taxes on corporations and the 1% are way too effing LOW!! smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #84
And Trump is not the only one. totodeinhere Nov 2015 #86
Where are our TPP cheerleaders who have said our wages should be competitive w/ India? X_Digger Nov 2015 #88

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
3. Pffft.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:15 AM
Nov 2015

You taker! We all should be Thankful We Have A Job much less actually being paid ANY wage for doing it! You ungrateful prole!














sarcasm

valerief

(53,235 posts)
28. Funny how he didn't mention LIVING EXPENSES are too high, too.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:52 AM
Nov 2015

It's all relative, and assholes like him only want to take, take, take.

LibDemAlways

(15,139 posts)
41. Trump has no clue about living expenses. He and
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:52 PM
Nov 2015

the missus have an army of servants and "yes" men and women who do the shopping, the cleaning, the cooking, the accounting, provide the transportation, make his appointments, and take care of the nuts and bolts of running the various businesses with the name Trump attached. All he has to do is get up from between his silk sheets in the morning, call in whoever on his staff dresses him and combs his ridiculous hair, confer with his private secretary, and go off to make inane comments about how ordinary folks are getting more than they deserve. He's lived in a bubble for so long he's completely lost touch with reality.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
76. They are if we are expected to compete with Vietnam or Cambodia or India.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:30 PM
Nov 2015

Think about it, they actually are.

Therefore

..............

.............

Anybody???

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
2. A new requirement-
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:15 AM
Nov 2015

For being a politician, All politicians must live on min wage for two years prior to running for any office, No help from family nor friends pay rent , power , Food etc. Suddenly we would no longer see politicians for profit and actually get public servants.

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
4. My proposaL
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:17 AM
Nov 2015

Tie the minimum wage to Congressional pay raises. What ever percentage their pay increases are so shall the increase in the minimum wage. Automatically.

Thav

(946 posts)
12. Better, set congressional pay equal to minimum wage
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:47 AM
Nov 2015

and only pay them for hours they're either on the floor, or in offices working. No pay for campaigning, no pay for travelling, no pay for when they're back home, or on vacation. Then bar them from using any other form of income - whether investement, consulting, or spousal pay - while in office. If they receive anything they didn't pay for, then that amount comes out of their pay as well. Someone buys them lunch? That's $15 they don't get. Oh, and drug test them every week, and if they fail all of their income will be revoked and they will have to repay any past income, they will be fired from office and barred from running for office ever again.

ruffburr

(1,190 posts)
33. LMAO!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:09 PM
Nov 2015

That beats my post, You have a Hell of a good plan going there, Maybe We should start a petition, Lol

Response to ruffburr (Reply #2)

maddiemom

(5,106 posts)
37. Hell, let them try living on that "unreasonable" TWELVE or fifteen dollars an hour,
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:30 PM
Nov 2015

compared to what they're used to making... and no paid "expenses," either

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
52. wait are you suggesting
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:01 PM
Nov 2015

that we actually get people that want to help the people
not coorporations

hah what foolishness is this
fox news says...back to reeducation camp

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
9. If the Dems have even a single brain cell, they will put this in campaign ads
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:36 AM
Nov 2015

and hang that around Trump's neck like a thousand-pound albatross.

 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
10. It's no secret that Republicans are for cheap labor! That's
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:39 AM
Nov 2015

why it's hard for me to swallow that a working man/women could ever vote Republican.

d_legendary1

(2,586 posts)
43. That's cuz the average working person is being lied to
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:01 PM
Nov 2015

by the media. They're blaming undocumented workers (illegals) for the jobs shortage, the Obama policies of taxation on the job creators, and why they're leaving the United States. They don't talk about NAFTA, WTO, and the other free trade agreements that our leaders signed that allows them to do this. They don't tell them about the off shore tax havens these companies have. And they sure as hell won't tell them that undocumented workers work for less than minimum wage and for crappy jobs.

The Media is what's keeping the GOP legit.

Martin Eden

(12,869 posts)
87. It's also hard to swallow they really want to deport all undocumented workers
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 12:32 AM
Nov 2015

Why don't they advocate cracking down on businesses that hire them?

If they couldn't work, they wouldn't be here.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
15. $3.70 for a gallon of milk? Much higher at the 'corner store' most 'poor' have to walk to.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:55 AM
Nov 2015

and just this week I paid $10 for a HALFgal. of organic milk at my close walgreens.

The Walgreens was totally out of whole milk, 4 gals of 1% in their case and that was about $4 a gallon.

"We take Snap" (foodstamps) signs, tens of snap signs all over Walgreens grocery area.

The 2 corner stores 1/2 mile walk from my neighborhood charge $6 a gallon for whole milk.

So $7.25 people have to work more then 1/2 hour for some decent milk and walk a mile for that milk.

stillwaiting

(3,795 posts)
17. WHY do we have to directly compete with slave labor wages in other parts of the world? WHY?
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:59 AM
Nov 2015

Last edited Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:25 PM - Edit history (1)

Because multinational corporations want us to do so? Is there ANY other reason why we should be made to have to compete with them directly on labor costs?

Everyone that is making us have to compete like this are HUGE assholes. It does not have to be this way. And, it is hugely selfish of incredibly wealthy people to make it be this way in the U.S.

Trump and a few others are simply saying out loud what ALL Republicans want for the U.S. as well as far too many elected Democrats. These pro-business/neo-liberal Democrats won't say it out loud quite like Trump, but they are ushering in this reality just like the Republicans are doing. And they are assholes too.


NonMetro

(631 posts)
57. Good Point!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:13 PM
Nov 2015

The way I see it, "we the people" have lost our sovereignty to the mega-corporations. We can no longer decide who we're going to compete with nor the rules of this so-called "competition". Private corporations have basically taken over and now they just tell us who we have to compete with and why we "must accept" lower wages and be glad that we have any job at all, rather than none. The "market" is really nothing more than private individuals, never elected by anyone, who use their money to rule over the rest of us, and essentially dictate the terms of life to the rest of us - and most elections have become jokes that mostly revolve around social issues like religion, abortion, or gay rights. If we were sovereign, in control of our own destinies, we would still have such issues, but we would also be able to determine our own welfare, well-being, and make the economy work for everyone, and not just a privileged few.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
19. You will never ever win a price war
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:07 AM
Nov 2015

I learned that working for a small printing company whose main competition was Kinkos. The salesmen complained they were losing jobs because our prices were higher than Kinkos. The sales manager reminded them, "You will never win a price war. There will always be someone who will do the job for less. You get the job by doing the job better and providing better customer service."

If Donald Trump cannot make his overpriced hotels profitable while paying his housekeeping staff minimum wage, there is something wrong with his business model.

mountain grammy

(26,621 posts)
20. The new normal for a good economy
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:19 AM
Nov 2015

is when minimum wage workers can survive because there are enough jobs to have more than one. During the roaring 90's, at one time, I had four jobs. A whole lot of luck got us through. It's insane that people work and work and work, making companies hugely profitable, but can't make ends meet, and have no financial security.. none!

onecaliberal

(32,861 posts)
21. All republicans want to get rid of minimum wage.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:21 AM
Nov 2015

To be honest I was shocked they had the balls to admit it. The stupid must not be watching these con debates.

Wounded Bear

(58,660 posts)
29. They have the sheeple convinced...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:53 AM
Nov 2015

that somehow, they will be better people without it.

They will be part of the noble poor. And damn those artificially inflated wages. "I'll earn what I deserve!"

They never learn that no, you'll earn what somebody else thinks you deserve, somebody who will benefit from you earning less. Without some form of coercion, you won't make more.

onecaliberal

(32,861 posts)
80. It is really difficult for me to believe people could possibly be that stupid.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:33 PM
Nov 2015

But I digress, you are correct.

 

lonestarnot

(77,097 posts)
22. That fucking meathead. Wages are to high for him... we better damn sure keep him off the payroll.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:23 AM
Nov 2015

madville

(7,410 posts)
24. Anyone who agrees with trade agreements like TPP and NAFTA
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:28 AM
Nov 2015

Agrees with this statement from Trump.

From a strictly business standpoint he is correct. With these trade agreements, wages in the US are too high to compete with low-wage members for labor costs.

Where the argument varies is the solution. One side will say American wages would have to come down to compete with some of these other nations for labor and the other side will say wages must come up in developing nations to meet the levels in America for fair competition.

This is a short-term argument from either side anyway. Automation, robotics, and AI will make human labor inefficient and obsolete in the next decade or two across all sectors.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
40. Allowing American companies to export their labor, offshore their untaxed profits, pay zero taxes at
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:38 PM
Nov 2015

home, pay below a living wage making taxpayers subsidize the labor cost for hugely profitable corporations so that the Walton family can all be among the top ten richest Americans, is wrong on many levels. The media avoid talking about this much since the media oligarchs are some of the beneficiaries of this situation. GE has been at the forefront of this and their network is a huge conflict of interest considering their culpability.

I cannot wait until we get Bernie elected and bust up the media oligarchy, tax these rich bastards that have received all of the gains from the last 40 years. I have no sympathy for them when they are forced to pay their workers a living wage and contribute to our tax revenue instead of taking from it!

As far as Hillary is concerned, she will do nothing to change any of this. Sure she will talk vaguely about how it is wrong, but you will notice that she will make not pledge to make them pay taxes, a living wage, or bust up the powerful oligarchies in banking and the media. These are her and Bill's friends that they have known and been supported by for the last 30 years.

This election is very different than past Presidential elections for the simple fact that Bernie represents a return to Democracy and an end to corporate rule. Hillary represents, more or less, the Obama status quo, socially somewhat liberal, financially in the tank for the Plutocrats. Thanks to their campaign and Super Pac donations they would be able to continue to exercise control over our government, judiciary, and the media. the real battle is between Bernie and Hillary, though I do have concerns over whether Hillary can beat the Republican in the General considering the level of hate she engenders with them. Many more would come out to vote AGAINST her than ever would if Bernie is the winner of the Primary.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
55. Perhaps someone should go out and ask Trump to reconcile this statement he had with this tweet...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

... that he put out earlier bad mouthing TPP... Ask Trump which statement is the truth and which is a lie, and for an explanation from him how both of them can be "truths"!



https://twitter.com/realdonaldtrump/status/606125803420700672

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
25. if minimum wage kept up with productivity
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:44 AM
Nov 2015

it would be at $21.72 an hour.

"The minimum wage should have reached $21.72 an hour in 2012 if it kept up with increases in worker productivity, according to a March study by the Center for Economic and Policy Research. While advancements in technology have increased the amount of goods and services that can be produced in a set amount of time, wages have remained relatively flat, the study points out."

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
27. thanks
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:49 AM
Nov 2015

i needed that number


my last number was like 5+ years old and @ $17/h or so (and was living wage)

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
49. elmac
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:46 PM
Nov 2015

just curious

reverse(elmac); <<--??
or something to do with mac's?

and if you haven't already been welcomed to DU..

Welcome willkommen valkommen

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
69. elmac is short for Muti-Elmac
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 04:02 PM
Nov 2015

made beautiful ham radio receivers and transmitters in Mi way back in the day.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
70. 'old timer techie dude'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 04:59 PM
Nov 2015

hug smile 'pats back'!

umm sorry about the emotional response, so few of us around
word!
cool!

still on the air?
i cheated out and am only on (trashtalk (cb))
now mostly doing telnet bbs offa a rpi no airwaves past cb

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
78. Whether they admit it or not
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:10 PM
Nov 2015

most hams got their start with CB. Had a blast with my JC Penny 23 chan base in the mid 70's, back then you could talk 30-40 miles during the day with 4 watts, the channels were skip free. Been a ham since '76. Back in the 80's I used a Commodore 64 with my receiver to received news teletype on the shortwave band, read the raw news that was being sent to the networks for their evening broadcast + some photo fax stuff. Lots of fun.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
79. that's why i reverted back
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:15 PM
Nov 2015

i found too many 'snobs on ham'

ssb or even cb was...more community


and yep
pet 2001, c64/c128/amiga 500, amiga 2k
lol

i still wanna do packet on ssb but i know it's not legal

 

elmac

(4,642 posts)
81. Packet was big back in the 80's and 90's
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:33 PM
Nov 2015

but not much activity now, there is APRS, PSK, SSTV and tons of other digital mods.

You do find "snobs" now & then but most are open to new hobbyists, new ideas, especially in the digital modes.

Getting your ham license is easier now that they eliminated the code test. The study guides have all the FCC questions and answers.
Would be a good winter project.

http://www.arrl.org/getting-licensed

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
82. may run that
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 06:38 PM
Nov 2015

i'm outside of US so different 'demands'


that being said...my ham radio 'thing' was classic 'radio shack' <<knowhow and tools

i know that was a long time ago, now i go to hackathons, maker meets and similar for the same


i do have a double cb raspbi combo that repeats and serves bbs

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
26. looks up
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 11:48 AM
Nov 2015

from sharpening the teeth of Mme La guillotine, nods, what ever you say Trump!

*keeps sharpening*

Alkene

(752 posts)
31. Wages!? Too liberal.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:00 PM
Nov 2015

Are there no prisons?

Plenty of prisons...

And the Union workhouses. Are they still in operation?

Both very busy, sir...

Those who are badly off must go there.

Many can't go there; and many would rather die.

If they would rather die, they had better do it, and decrease the surplus population!

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
34. We're all supposed to be our own bosses too....
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:17 PM
Nov 2015

That's the thinking.

The myth that EVERYONE in America has the FREEDOM to start their own business.

If your business goes under than you're a LOSER. Might as well commit suicide now and make way for the WINNERS.

BTW: I found out today that someone I know who came off like that has had a stroke. His wife told me he refused to take his meds because he figured the doctors didn't know what they were talking about. Now he's catatonic. She's putting him into a nursing home.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
38. This was literally completely ignored on debate night. Glad to see this is getting
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:30 PM
Nov 2015

the traction it so richly deserves. K&R!

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
45. Naturally, for fear scrutiny of inflated pay would turn to CEO's.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:15 PM
Nov 2015

It's kind of like that expression, 'those in glass houses should cast no stones.'

42. Just "work harder"
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 12:57 PM
Nov 2015

"People have to go out, they have to work really hard and have to get into that upper stratum." -- D. Trump

This is the Republican lie which is one of the reasons people vote for them (the others being guns, gays, abortion, racism):

In their world, everyone is either a millionaire or a millionaire-in-waiting. This is the "self-reliant" promise they dangle as a carrot in front of a mule. Work hard and you will become as rich as we are.

Except that's impossible because:

1. We don't have a living wage (and the Repugs want to do away with the minimum wage).

2. If you go to school to get a shot at the golden ring, you'll leave with a crushing load of debt and a degree which will help you get an entry level job which will be replaced by a foreign worker you will have to train.

3. The way to riches is through "self reliance" which translates into entrepreneurship. Canadian Ted Cruz wants to get rid of the Department of Commerce (doing that is so important he said it twice in the same sentence at the debate). That is the department which contains the Small Business Administration, which is responsible for offering SBA loans to entrepreneurs. Let's make it as hard as possible to start a new business!

4. Unions, which have been a traditional path to the middle class, must be abolished.

5. All government services must be privatized (even the VA!), even though there is an abundance of evidence that doing so invariably makes the services more expensive.

6. Retirement funds can be raided by corporations or destroyed through corporate bankruptcy.

And on, and on. Yet the promise is there that you are a "millionaire-in-waiting." Who knows, maybe you'll be the next one to win the lottery!

Sheesh. How people can vote against their interests is something I'd like to see studied by sociologists (not to be confused with the dreaded nation-killing socialists).

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
44. It's funny - when did he last volunteer to lower his own wages?
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:13 PM
Nov 2015

When did ANYONE making that kind of money volunteer to lower their own wages?

They go on and on, when the argument is about making taxation more progressive, that the poor and middle classes can send in more money to the IRS if they want to help balance the budget/fund food stamps/etc., but when it comes to paying a wage, all wages except for their own are already too high.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
56. i'm ok with a lowering
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:07 PM
Nov 2015

let's say...to where it affects quality of living equally

he drops his paycheck to where he's almost starving
and i keep my paycheck at the same point, where i'm almost starving (unless i was doing a shitload of overtime and growing food at home)

moondust

(19,984 posts)
48. CEO Guy needs a break.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 01:45 PM
Nov 2015

Cutting or eliminating the minimum wage will make it easy for CEO Guy to cut his labor costs, leading to a big profit boost on his quarterly reports and allowing him to demand a bigger compensation package.

Won't somebody please come to his rescue?! CEO Guy just wants to become the first private trillionaire is all. That's not too much to ask. Then everybody can celebrate with him the boundless wonders of corporate capitalism!!!






w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
54. hmmm too high you say eeeeey?
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:05 PM
Nov 2015

picks you up by ankles, shakes you upside down

seee seee you had a penny, the rent is not high enough!

---
yes, this post contains weird humor and sarcasm

fwiw the rent is too high!!! Even the flipping immigration border control quote a 'housing cost' (rent+electricity+phone+water+heat+garbage and sewer) at 25% of total paycheck

allow me at this time to roll on the floor laughing wildly pointing fingers and going 'you funny F'kker' @ bcins(or what ever immigration calls themselves now)

thanks
---

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
59. truth
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:37 PM
Nov 2015

but i can cry or i can laugh, and so far i'm too strong to cry!
i'm too angry, too nasty, too horrible to cry!

great post merrily

merrily

(45,251 posts)
60. You are too kind about my silly posts.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:44 PM
Nov 2015

I'm so sorry that "cry" is currently one of your options. Sometimes, even the very strong cry. And sometimes, it helps. But, you know best what keeps you going and at your strongest. Ignore me and do that.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
62. :))
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:55 PM
Nov 2015

fair call
IF i find your posts silly i'll slam you over it
if you find mine silly, you do the same for me..

keep some reality check

i don't mind crying, i just would rather channel the energy into some....bern

merrily

(45,251 posts)
63. Whatever best does it for you. I'm on your side!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:58 PM
Nov 2015

But, slamming me on each and every one of my silly posts would be way too consuming. You'd be better off taking up tatting.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
64. umm ...ummm
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:10 PM
Nov 2015

what is "tatting"?


and i'd never slam you on every silly post, not suggesting you have a lot of them

oh...umm
i'll just sit here and chew on my foot a little
yeah...never mind

merrily

(45,251 posts)
66. Unsure. I just love the word. Sounds like a proper hobby/skill for a proper
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:19 PM
Nov 2015

Victorian damsel. I'll look it up:

tat·ting
ˈtatiNG/
noun
noun: tatting

a kind of knotted lace made by hand with a small shuttle, used chiefly for trimming.
the process of tatting.


LOL! Still not sure. Images for Tatting--ok, this is an instance when a picture is worth 1000 words, or at least a couple of dozen: Check out the pics on this wiki page.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tatting

Looks like making lace with something that works, and looks a little, like a crotchet hook.

And so, today we learn and move forward together, which, like humor, is good.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
67. yay i forced you to learn!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:34 PM
Nov 2015

and thus you taught me *bows*

somewhere between crocheting and macrame ?

i'll just raise my eyebrows, have some arsenic and opium and paint a picture (hey, you introduced victorian)


merrily

(45,251 posts)
68. I used to learn on DU daily. Now, not so much.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 03:46 PM
Nov 2015

I don't even look as many things up myself anymore because a lot of the "political discussion" has devolved to "Your candidate and his/her supporters all wear their poopy diapers on their respective heads---er, jurors, I meant "most," not all."

Yes, somewhere between crochet and macrame sounds right, though I never did macrame. I did once crochet a huge Christmas stocking and a baby's bib while pregnant, though. That was the end of my career, I fear. Never learned knitting or anything like that.

In the area of Victorian opiates, I always liked the sound of



lau·da·num
ˈlôdn-əm,ˈlôdnəm/
noun
noun: laudanum

an alcoholic solution containing morphine, prepared from opium and formerly used as a narcotic painkiller.


As I post to you, I'm realizing I am a word sound snob, even if I don't know the precise meaning. I'm so ashamed!








w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
72. oh merrily :)
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:09 PM
Nov 2015

Word snob is ok. No shame on you!

I've had laudanum (short time broken clavicle) ummm not something to repeat...at least not the 'withdrawal'



what little crocheting i've done was 'school crafts' (we had to do 3 terms (half year) wood/metal and 3 terms textile and fabric)

i've tied nets (fishing) tho...similar

as one of them well hated FURRINERS (even though legal)
and even though my English is ok (yes, i ignore 'i' capitalization and punctuation)
I look everything up

I do agree and have tried (despite my low post count) to provoke multiple posts of 'we need to work as a team'

sanders hillary omalley..we are all dems

personally i'd do sanders (euro social democrat here)
but we need to be a team, ...why? cause the religious right is...cause the right wingnuts..are!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
73. Word sound snob, even if I have only a passing knowledge of the meaning.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:14 PM
Nov 2015

In my defense, "Stick to tatting" and "That's it! I'm dosing with laudanum" do sound good to me.

I'm for Sanders. That's all that matters during primary season.

w0nderer

(1,937 posts)
74. and thus we are in agreement
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:22 PM
Nov 2015

*snaps to attention* Bern on!

i am not allowed to vote, but i'm allowed to motivate and change opinion and work to change peoples' opinion !

killer bots!
i can't vote
i WON'T vote for a democrat
i'm not allowed!
it's called being a legal permanent resident
i pay taxes but don't get representation!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
75. AFAIK, no one can stop you from volunteering for your candidate.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 05:26 PM
Nov 2015

I've got to get busy offline! Have a great day.

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
53. I guess then we need to note this to right wingers that support Trump rejecting TPP and H-1B...
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:03 PM
Nov 2015

... that either those stances he had earlier to try and attract them were BULLSHIT, or this line is BULLSHIT! He can't support both stances legitimately! Ask them if a rich 1%er dude like him is more apt to support other rich people or to support the rest of us in reality!

Trump just solidified Bernie as the only candidate in both parties truly supporting American workers' plight against being screwed by "free trade" deals and these BS "guest worker" programs.

trotsky

(49,533 posts)
61. You need to understand how their base is programmed to process this.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 02:48 PM
Nov 2015

They don't see him as saying "YOU are paid too much."

They see it as "Everyone not like you is paid too much."

Code words, dog whistles, etc.

totodeinhere

(13,058 posts)
86. And Trump is not the only one.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 10:34 PM
Nov 2015

Jeb Bush has called for the elimination of the federal minimum wage for instance. Trump is the bombastic one, but Bush would do just as much harm to our country. It's just that his handlers are trying to make him come off as more reasonable. But he is not. And soft spoken Ben Carson is in reality a snake in the grass.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
88. Where are our TPP cheerleaders who have said our wages should be competitive w/ India?
Fri Nov 13, 2015, 12:38 AM
Nov 2015

Or Viet Nam?

Funny, they never seem to put their money where there mouth is and come out and say it so openly as this moron does.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Wages are too high?