Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ck4829

(35,077 posts)
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 08:48 AM Nov 2015

State senator in Missouri trying to ban student research of 72 hour waiting period for abortion

A state lawmaker wants to stop a graduate student at the University of Missouri from continuing research for her dissertation on the impact of a 72-hour waiting period on women considering abortions.

Missouri state Sen. Kurt Schaefer (R-Columbia) claimed in a letter to the university chancellor dated Oct. 30 that the university is breaking the law by allowing the student to carry out her research. The grad student is studying a recently imposed law requiring women in Missouri to wait 72 hours between the time they seek information about an abortion and the point at which they have the procedure.

It's the latest in an ongoing battle between state lawmakers and the university over its relationship to Planned Parenthood. A decision by the university in September to cancel 10 contracts with Planned Parenthood helped fuel recent protests on campus that led to the ouster of the university system's president and the flagship campus' chancellor.

Schaefer is chairman of the Missouri senate's interim Committee on the Sanctity of Life and a GOP candidate for state attorney general. The state senate began investigating Mizzou's ties to Planned Parenthood this year after an anti-abortion group released heavily edited videos purporting to show that the women's health clinics were selling aborted fetal tissue. No evidence has emerged to prove this assertion; rather, some Planned Parenthood clinics request the reimbursement for the cost of delivering tissue to be used for medical research.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/abortion-study-university-of-missouri_563fab2be4b0411d307168a3

Talk about small government.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
State senator in Missouri trying to ban student research of 72 hour waiting period for abortion (Original Post) ck4829 Nov 2015 OP
Wimmin will be much happier when they shut up and let the mens decide for them. Orrex Nov 2015 #1
Well, it's clear the student just does not know their place!!! RKP5637 Nov 2015 #2
They tryin' to steal Turbineguy Nov 2015 #3
Abortion-studies? Bad. Gun-studies? Bad. Marijuana-studies? Bad. DetlefK Nov 2015 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author trumad Nov 2015 #5
Interfering with in-process dissertation research approved by all relevant academic committees! alcibiades_mystery Nov 2015 #6
The GOP banning research? blackspade Nov 2015 #7
Pure Fascism kwolf68 Nov 2015 #8
What NAZIs?? Octafish Nov 2015 #9
Why the GOPer is so deeply in charge in so many states: No opposition. nt Eleanors38 Nov 2015 #10

Orrex

(63,212 posts)
1. Wimmin will be much happier when they shut up and let the mens decide for them.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 08:54 AM
Nov 2015

Surely there's no better use of a state lawmaker's time than fucking with an individual student's academic career.

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
4. Abortion-studies? Bad. Gun-studies? Bad. Marijuana-studies? Bad.
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 09:09 AM
Nov 2015

Psst. Don't tell them that scientists have likely found the biochemical process that decides whether you are gay or not. (It's not your DNA. It's chemical markers that accompany your DNA.)

Response to ck4829 (Original post)

 

alcibiades_mystery

(36,437 posts)
6. Interfering with in-process dissertation research approved by all relevant academic committees!
Thu Nov 12, 2015, 09:31 AM
Nov 2015

This is Lysenkoism on the right, now.

It's long been the strategy of right wingers to prohibit by statute the scientific studies needed to assess public policy - to literally prohibit the collection and/or publication of that data. These kinds of prohibitions happen across the social field, with the most obvious prohibitions relating to gun violence and reproductive rights. (Even supposedly Democratic gunners support such prohibitions, not shockingly).

But to micro-apply them at the level of an ongoing dissertation project!? My Gawd. A project already approved at several levels of review by qualified academic experts? I suppose some people think you just get up in the morning and start working on your dissertation, on whatever topic you please. Um, no. Nope. No.

This is infuriating.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»State senator in Missouri...