General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOnce Again, Justice Sotomayor Proves Herself an Ally Against Police Brutality
On March 23, 2010, trooper Chadrin Mullinex of the Texas Department of Public Safety fired six shots at Israel Leija Jrs car. Leija was allegedly armed and intoxicated, and he was the subject of a high-speed police chase. Instead of seeing if the spike strips he had put out stopped the runaway, Mullinex chose to fire his gun at Leijas car even ignoring the orders of his supervisor not to shoot.
*The majority opinion rationalized the officers use of deadly force, saying that during car chases, the standards for application of this law is hazy. Only Justice Sotomayor dissented against the ruling, which granted Mullinex qualified immunity.
Sotomayor has repeatedly proven herself as an outspoken critic of police violence, and this decision was no exception. Once again, she was in the position of reminding her fellow justices and the American public that police operate under constitutional limits, intended to protect individual citizens from police brutality and the use of deadly force.
Mullenix ignored the longstanding and well-settled Fourth Amendment rule that there must be a governmental interest not just in seizing a suspect, but in the level of force used to effectuate that seizure, Sotomayor wrote. She continued:
When Mullenix confronted his superior officer after the shooting, his first words were, Hows that for proactive? (Mullenix was apparently referencing an earlier counseling session in which Byrd suggested that he was not enterprising enough.) The glib comment does not impact our legal analysis; an officers actual intentions are irrelevant to the Fourth Amendments objectively reasonable inquiry. But the comment seems to me revealing of the culture this Courts decision supports when it calls it reasonableor even reasonably reasonableto use deadly force for no discernible gain and over a supervisors express order to stand by. By sanctioning a shoot first, think later approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow."
http://www.jdjournal.com/2015/11/11/once-again-justice-sotomayor-proves-herself-an-ally-against-police-brutality/
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Which goes back to my point that we lost the SCOTUS a LONG time ago.
damnedifIknow
(3,183 posts)" a shoot first, think later approach to policing, the Court renders the protections of the Fourth Amendment hollow."