Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

herding cats

(19,567 posts)
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:24 PM Nov 2015

If you're interested in the 6 year old boy shot by police in La. you may want to read this.

Police disavowed an earlier explanation for why officers shot at a car driven by Chris Few, killing his six-year-old son, Jeremy Madis, in Marksville

State investigators conceded on Thursday that local police officers had fired the shots that killed a small boy in Marksville, Louisiana, and disavowed an earlier explanation for why the officers deployed their guns.

The boy, Jeremy Mardis, died on Tuesday night after police shot into a car driven by his father, Chris Few. On Thursday, Colonel Michael Edmonson, head of the Louisiana state police, denied earlier reports that Few had been reversing his car toward the officers, who then had to defend themselves. “No. I didn’t say that,” he told the Guardian. “That didn’t come from me.”

At a press conference, Edmonson initially described the shooting as “an exchange of gunfire”, but later clarified that only the officers had shot, and that investigators had found no gun in Few’s car. Officials had previously declined to confirm whether officer gunfire was responsible for Mardis’s death.
The Counted: people killed by police in the United States in 2015 – interactive
The Guardian is counting the people killed by US law enforcement agencies this year. Read their stories and contribute to our ongoing, crowdsourced project
Read more

Edmonson also said video footage of the incident does exist, but that investigators have not reviewed it. He added that the officers involved – there are four – had so far refused to speak with state police investigators. Police have not released the names of the involved officers.
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/nov/05/louisiana-police-deny-car-reversing-six-year-old-shot
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
If you're interested in the 6 year old boy shot by police in La. you may want to read this. (Original Post) herding cats Nov 2015 OP
Must be nice HassleCat Nov 2015 #1
Did you see this part? herding cats Nov 2015 #4
Jurisdictional feuds are common HassleCat Nov 2015 #5
This is so horrible. polly7 Nov 2015 #2
Refusal to speak in front exboyfil Nov 2015 #3
That's La., not L.A. KamaAina Nov 2015 #6
Changed it. herding cats Nov 2015 #7
Thanks for posting Tsiyu Nov 2015 #8
I'm sorry, I didn't see it. herding cats Nov 2015 #10
No problema! Dupes are fine in GD Tsiyu Nov 2015 #12
And they get insulted when you call them murderers. Vinca Nov 2015 #9
Calling them pigs is a gross insult hifiguy Nov 2015 #11
Sounds like Organized Crime to me... AzDar Nov 2015 #13
Wait...they still have not reviewed the video footage? They are investigating correct? Rex Nov 2015 #14
I'm guessing that they have reviewed the video.. frylock Nov 2015 #16
#blueLIESmatter frylock Nov 2015 #15
Sickening and not surprising...knr joeybee12 Nov 2015 #17
It used to be, we wouldn't hear about these episodes for months, even years, mountain grammy Nov 2015 #18
I am amazed that the cops didn't plant a drop gun avebury Nov 2015 #19
Maybe they thought one of the other three did. Rex Nov 2015 #20
Nothing illegal given the fact that there is no actual outstanding avebury Nov 2015 #21
Wait! What? There was no WARRANT? Glitterati Nov 2015 #22
The state is investigating and, from what I read online avebury Nov 2015 #25
WTF? They blew away a 6 year old child for THAT?? smirkymonkey Nov 2015 #23
Wow..nt Jesus Malverde Nov 2015 #24
Two of the Louisiana cops now under arrest facing 2nd Degree Murder charges. avebury Nov 2015 #26
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
1. Must be nice
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:26 PM
Nov 2015

"We would like to speak to you about what happened."

"Nope. Don't feel like it right now. Thanks anyway."

herding cats

(19,567 posts)
4. Did you see this part?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:30 PM
Nov 2015
At least one of the shooters was a Marksville police officer who was moonlighting for the city marshal’s office, an agency responsible for serving court papers . But according to Marksville’s mayor, John Lemoine, city marshal Floyd Voinche and his officers have recently begun overstepping their authority.

“I don’t know why he felt the need to start patrolling in city limits,” Lemoine said Thursday of Voinche. “It makes no sense to me.”


What the hell?
 

HassleCat

(6,409 posts)
5. Jurisdictional feuds are common
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:41 PM
Nov 2015

These sheriffs and police chiefs sometimes have big egos, and they let their egos make decisions for them. My parents lived in Albuquerque in the 1970s, and they had some battle going on between the sheriff and the city police. It got to the point where sheriff deputies were required to stop before they entered the city and install cloth covers over their red & blue lights. I don't remember all the details, but it was ridiculous.

polly7

(20,582 posts)
2. This is so horrible.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:27 PM
Nov 2015

Also from your link:

"Moments later, she said, as the cars pulled away from the light, she saw two marshals’ cars – marked in black and white – approaching from behind with their lights flashing. She looked into Few’s car as he pulled away, and he was pointing at his son’s head, indicating that he was in the car and he wasn’t sure what to do.

Few was afraid of the marshals, she said, because he and and one of the marshals on the scene had a prior personal conflict."



That poor, poor little boy.

exboyfil

(17,865 posts)
3. Refusal to speak in front
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:29 PM
Nov 2015

of investigators and under oath should be immediate grounds for dismissal. It should a be a condition of employment for a law enforcement officer. They have a right the the 5th Amendment - they do not have the right to be an officer.

herding cats

(19,567 posts)
7. Changed it.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 03:47 PM
Nov 2015

I always default to postal code abbreviations, which I can see could be confusing in this case.

Thanks for mentioning it.

herding cats

(19,567 posts)
10. I'm sorry, I didn't see it.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 04:00 PM
Nov 2015

I post a lot of OP's as a rule. This incident just reeks so much I wanted to share it here.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
14. Wait...they still have not reviewed the video footage? They are investigating correct?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 05:55 PM
Nov 2015

Stinky fish to high heaven on this one. No reason to 'deploy' their guns...no word as to why they killed two people in broad daylight.

frylock

(34,825 posts)
16. I'm guessing that they have reviewed the video..
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:27 PM
Nov 2015

and that's why previous reports of backing into the patrol car, and an "exchange" of gunfire are being walked back.

mountain grammy

(26,655 posts)
18. It used to be, we wouldn't hear about these episodes for months, even years,
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:47 PM
Nov 2015

if ever. Look how long the Trayvon Martin case was kept quiet. I think law enforcement has had cover for a long time and that's coming to an end. Justice delayed is justice denied. I've been reading the Gauardian daily and checking the website "The Counted" at least once a week. Americans must wake up to the violence perpetuated by police forces and demand change.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
20. Maybe they thought one of the other three did.
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 06:57 PM
Nov 2015

No gun and no truck ramming into them either. SO what did he do?

avebury

(10,952 posts)
21. Nothing illegal given the fact that there is no actual outstanding
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 07:09 PM
Nov 2015

warrant and the cops lied their butts off. His "crime" was being involved in some incident with one of the cops in the past (personal not police related). It sounded like he was concerned about what the cop would do to him since a badge and gun seem to give some cops the impression that they can use said gun and badge in dealing with personal grudges. I think the incident was personal and the other three cops joined in with the idiot cop and they screwed up big time and a young child lost his life. All 4 cops should face criminal charges. I see a civil suit in their (and the marshall's office) future with a large payout to the family.

 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
22. Wait! What? There was no WARRANT?
Fri Nov 6, 2015, 08:28 PM
Nov 2015

They had absolutely no reason to stop this guy and they blew away a KID just because?

Are you serious?

avebury

(10,952 posts)
25. The state is investigating and, from what I read online
Sat Nov 7, 2015, 07:43 AM
Nov 2015

they have not been able to find an outstanding warrant on the guy.

Pretty much all that the cops said initially has been disproven. I imagine why they have all lawyered up and are not cooperating with the investigation.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If you're interested in t...