Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyTheDog

(6,837 posts)
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 12:37 PM Nov 2015

In our Wi-Fi world, the Internet still depends on undersea cables

In case you needed something else to worry about today...

Recently a New York Times article on Russian submarine activity near undersea communications cables dredged up Cold War politics and generated widespread recognition of the submerged systems we all depend upon.

Not many people realize that undersea cables transport nearly 100 percent of transoceanic data traffic. These lines are laid on the very bottom of the ocean floor. They’re about as thick as a garden hose and carry the world’s Internet, phone calls and even TV transmissions between continents at the speed of light. A single cable can carry tens of terabits of information per second.

While researching my book The Undersea Network, I realized that the cables we all rely on to send everything from email to banking information across the seas remain largely unregulated and undefended. Although they are laid by only a few companies (including the American company SubCom and the French company Alcatel-Lucent) and often funneled along narrow paths, the ocean’s vastness has often provided them protection.

The fact that we route Internet traffic through the ocean – amidst deep sea creatures and hydrothermal vents – runs counter to most people’s imaginings of the Internet. Didn’t we develop satellites and Wi-Fi to transmit signals through the air? Haven’t we moved to the cloud? Undersea cable systems sound like a thing of the past.

MORE HERE: http://yonside.com/in-our-wi-fi-world-the-internet-still-depends-on-undersea-cables/


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In our Wi-Fi world, the Internet still depends on undersea cables (Original Post) LuckyTheDog Nov 2015 OP
Thick as a garden hose? LOL- maybe 10 snooper2 Nov 2015 #1
Modern cables are typically 69 millimetres (2.7 in) in diameter and weigh around 10 kilograms per me saturnsring Nov 2015 #4
Remember the Tessier-Ashpool-clan from "Neuromancer"... DetlefK Nov 2015 #2
Satellites cost a ton of money for very little bandwidth Lee-Lee Nov 2015 #3
latency matters :) snooper2 Nov 2015 #5
This Betty88 Nov 2015 #6
True for geosynchronus orbits like the military typically uses GummyBearz Nov 2015 #7
Military grade satelites are a whole different ball game GummyBearz Nov 2015 #8
Interesting, though LuckyTheDog Nov 2015 #9
 

saturnsring

(1,832 posts)
4. Modern cables are typically 69 millimetres (2.7 in) in diameter and weigh around 10 kilograms per me
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:30 PM
Nov 2015

Modern cables are typically 69 millimetres (2.7 in) in diameter and weigh around 10 kilograms per metre (7 lb/ft), although thinner and lighter cables are used for deep-water sections.[

DetlefK

(16,423 posts)
2. Remember the Tessier-Ashpool-clan from "Neuromancer"...
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:09 PM
Nov 2015

They made their fortune with Internet-servers orbiting Earth as satellites.

 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
3. Satellites cost a ton of money for very little bandwidth
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:25 PM
Nov 2015

There number of them required to run even all the bandwidth we needed wouldn't be practical at all.

I did a lot of satellite stuff with the Army, all our logistics stuff is based on them when deployed. It's slow, complex, and costs a lot of $$$$ to get even a tiny fraction of the bandwidth needed.

 

GummyBearz

(2,931 posts)
8. Military grade satelites are a whole different ball game
Tue Nov 3, 2015, 01:59 PM
Nov 2015

The geosynchronous orbit, jam resistance, low probability of intercept/detection, secure-SATCOM military systems are very very expensive. But that is not the paradigm a commercial system would be based on. See the OneWeb project as an example:

http://techxplore.com/news/2015-01-oneweb-satellite-constellation-internet-billions.html

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/tech/pioneers-google-facebook-spacex-oneweb-satellite-drone-balloon-internet/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In our Wi-Fi world, the I...