General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn our Wi-Fi world, the Internet still depends on undersea cables
In case you needed something else to worry about today...
Not many people realize that undersea cables transport nearly 100 percent of transoceanic data traffic. These lines are laid on the very bottom of the ocean floor. Theyre about as thick as a garden hose and carry the worlds Internet, phone calls and even TV transmissions between continents at the speed of light. A single cable can carry tens of terabits of information per second.
While researching my book The Undersea Network, I realized that the cables we all rely on to send everything from email to banking information across the seas remain largely unregulated and undefended. Although they are laid by only a few companies (including the American company SubCom and the French company Alcatel-Lucent) and often funneled along narrow paths, the oceans vastness has often provided them protection.
The fact that we route Internet traffic through the ocean amidst deep sea creatures and hydrothermal vents runs counter to most peoples imaginings of the Internet. Didnt we develop satellites and Wi-Fi to transmit signals through the air? Havent we moved to the cloud? Undersea cable systems sound like a thing of the past.
MORE HERE: http://yonside.com/in-our-wi-fi-world-the-internet-still-depends-on-undersea-cables/
snooper2
(30,151 posts)methinks dude better do some more research
saturnsring
(1,832 posts)Modern cables are typically 69 millimetres (2.7 in) in diameter and weigh around 10 kilograms per metre (7 lb/ft), although thinner and lighter cables are used for deep-water sections.[
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)They made their fortune with Internet-servers orbiting Earth as satellites.
Lee-Lee
(6,324 posts)There number of them required to run even all the bandwidth we needed wouldn't be practical at all.
I did a lot of satellite stuff with the Army, all our logistics stuff is based on them when deployed. It's slow, complex, and costs a lot of $$$$ to get even a tiny fraction of the bandwidth needed.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)Landlines are faster,signal does not have to make a round trip to outer space
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)But not necessarily true for LEO (low earth orbit) satelites. 40 ms ping times and broad bandwidths are being targeted currently for the oneweb constellation...
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/tech/pioneers-google-facebook-spacex-oneweb-satellite-drone-balloon-internet/
http://techxplore.com/news/2015-01-oneweb-satellite-constellation-internet-billions.html
GummyBearz
(2,931 posts)The geosynchronous orbit, jam resistance, low probability of intercept/detection, secure-SATCOM military systems are very very expensive. But that is not the paradigm a commercial system would be based on. See the OneWeb project as an example:
http://techxplore.com/news/2015-01-oneweb-satellite-constellation-internet-billions.html
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/tech/pioneers-google-facebook-spacex-oneweb-satellite-drone-balloon-internet/
LuckyTheDog
(6,837 posts)Undersea cables are the unsung heroes of the connected world.