Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Newsjock

(11,733 posts)
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:05 AM Nov 2015

Aloha to the US: Is Hawai'i an occupied nation?

Source: BBC News

An upcoming election has highlighted the deep disagreement between native Hawaiians over what the future should look like. For some, it's formal recognition of their community and a changed relationship within the US. Others want to leave the US entirely - or more accurately, want the US to leave Hawai'i.

... The first ballots to elect delegates to a convention, or 'aha, for this purpose have now gone out in Hawai'i. Forty delegates from across the islands will meet in February to discuss whether there should be a Native Hawaiian government and what it should look like in the 21st Century.

But not everyone is happy with the 'aha. Some of those who would be eligible to vote, or become delegates themselves, have said they will boycott it. One delegate candidate has already dropped out, calling the 'aha "not pono" (upright or fair).

... Recognition would define native Hawaiians as a separate political entity - protecting many of the federal programmes currently provided to native Hawaiians, like favourable housing loans, a land trust programme, health care, educational and cultural grants. It would also allow for an element of economic independence, although one industry that has enriched a few Native American tribes - gambling - is banned in Hawai'i.

But all of this is predicated on the idea the US government is the rightful authority in Hawai'i, something a small but increasing number of Hawaiians no longer believe.

Read more: http://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-34680564

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

-none

(1,884 posts)
1. Hawaii is another area we took over because we could.
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:39 AM
Nov 2015

We wanted it because of its strategic location in the middle of nowhere, so we took it.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
4. Precisely what I was going to say!
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:32 PM
Nov 2015

And no more so than many (if not most) other countries, for that matter...

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
7. Thanks for displaying your ignorance of Hawaiian history
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 02:18 PM
Nov 2015

Hawaii was a unified sovereign nation destined to become part of the British Empire. Hell... look at the Hawaiian flag. Why do you think that there is a British flag embedded in it? Almost all the former British colonies are again sovereign nations.

The queen was illegally overthrown by the U.S. No other state remotely comes close to a legitimate claim of independence as Hawaii.

 

KamaAina

(78,249 posts)
8. Actually, a Canadian named Ashford was poking around the islands in the 1870s
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 03:02 PM
Nov 2015

looking to have Hawai'i join the nascent Confederacy.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
5. if a majority accept the US government as the rightful authority, that ends the discussion
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 12:36 PM
Nov 2015

there are Texans who have the same set of beliefs.

hunter

(38,325 posts)
6. Nationalism of any sort is annoying...
Mon Nov 2, 2015, 01:08 PM
Nov 2015

...and not much different than religious fundamentalism.

Any religion or nationalism that gets in the way of people living together peacefully is a big shovel of shit.

Those who worship the "invisible" hand of the free market," the economic imperialists, are a big shovel of shit too. This thing we now call "economic productivity" is not productivity at all, it has become a direct measure of the damage we do to our Mother Earth and our own human spirit.

My accidental nation of birth, this U.S.A., still isn't doing right by Native Americans or the descendants of African slaves.

Native Pacific Islanders ought to hope for better.

Maybe we humans will figure it all out before this current world civilization based on crass consumerism and military power collapses. But I'm not optimistic.



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Aloha to the US: Is Hawai...