General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGOP Candidates Frightened Away From Scary Debates They Can’t Control
http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=30015Now the GOP contenders are planning to huddle together to come up with a new debate format that better suits their needs. They intend to address how they might take more control over the process, diminish the role of the Republican National Committee, and decide how the debates are conducted, including the selection of moderators. Its an unprecedented initiative to transform what is supposed to be an open dialog that provides voters with an informative look at the candidates, into a PR vehicle that functions more like propaganda.
The RNC, which is taking some heat from the candidates, had already barred MSNBC from hosting any debates when they originally published their schedule back in January. That admission of fear has now escalated as the RNC chairman, Reince Priebus, advised NBC today that the one debate they had scheduled (Fox News has four), in partnership with Telemundo, has been suspended, whatever that means. So the RNC intends to punish NBC for the perceived wrongs committed by a separate unit of the Comcast/NBC family, And in the process they are also risking their only access to a minority audience, via Telemundo, that the GOP desperately needs to make inroads with. Will Republicans make demands as to who will moderate or what can be asked in order to lift the suspension? Well, Priebus is now saying that Every debate on the calendar is going to be reevaluated, reset look at the format, the moderators, everything,
What really makes this whole phony controversy ridiculous is that it doesnt benefit any political party to impose such strict demands. First of all, if they get their wish and appear before friendly moderators like Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Rush Limbaugh (as Ted Cruz actually suggested last night on Hannitys show), they might find the questioning even more damaging. The rightist Taliban, as represented by Limbaugh et al, will be more likely to force candidates to stake out extreme positions which they will be unable to Etch-a-Sketch away after the primaries. The wingnut media are notoriously committed to the sort of ideological purity that voters find repugnant. Whats more, even if they got the sympathetic treatment they desire, it would only result in the candidates being woefully unprepared for the full-contact combat they will eventually encounter in the general election.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)At least as a national party.
People would see how insane they really are.
safeinOhio
(32,729 posts)And when they hit rock bottom, just toss em a pick and shovel.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)salin
(48,955 posts)I can't believe their advisers are so far in the bubble that they don't realize how dangerous this would be for their candidates and party.
patricia92243
(12,603 posts)side is. They EXCELL at this, and their base will consider they have been given "red meat." The candidate ignorance will never be uncovered, and the bases ignorance will be satisfied.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)They will do away with taxes but nobody who matters will suffer, and America will have a military so enormous and powerful that all foreign countries will do whatever we tell them to do.
Said by 10 candidates one after another.
And nobody asks how or for any specifics.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
B Calm
(28,762 posts)proof none of them are fit to be president.
C_U_L8R
(45,021 posts)and its deceptive to describe them as such.
They're nothing more than beauty pageants
(with really heinous mean-spirited contestants).
None of these conservative clowns could stand
the heat of a real debate. I dare them to try.
Volaris
(10,274 posts)We're keeping the white house, there's almost no doubt .
If we're smart about how we go about it, we can get the Senate back, too.