Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:39 AM Oct 2015

GOP Candidates Frightened Away From Scary Debates They Can’t Control

http://www.newscorpse.com/ncWP/?p=30015

Now the GOP contenders are planning to huddle together to come up with a new debate format that better suits their needs. They intend to address how they might take more control over the process, diminish the role of the Republican National Committee, and decide how the debates are conducted, including the selection of moderators. It’s an unprecedented initiative to transform what is supposed to be an open dialog that provides voters with an informative look at the candidates, into a PR vehicle that functions more like propaganda.

The RNC, which is taking some heat from the candidates, had already barred MSNBC from hosting any debates when they originally published their schedule back in January. That admission of fear has now escalated as the RNC chairman, Reince Priebus, advised NBC today that the one debate they had scheduled (Fox News has four), in partnership with Telemundo, has been “suspended,” whatever that means. So the RNC intends to punish NBC for the perceived wrongs committed by a separate unit of the Comcast/NBC family, And in the process they are also risking their only access to a minority audience, via Telemundo, that the GOP desperately needs to make inroads with. Will Republicans make demands as to who will moderate or what can be asked in order to lift the suspension? Well, Priebus is now saying that “Every debate on the calendar is going to be reevaluated, reset — look at the format, the moderators, everything,”

What really makes this whole phony controversy ridiculous is that it doesn’t benefit any political party to impose such strict demands. First of all, if they get their wish and appear before “friendly” moderators like Sean Hannity, Mark Levin, and Rush Limbaugh (as Ted Cruz actually suggested last night on Hannity’s show), they might find the questioning even more damaging. The rightist Taliban, as represented by Limbaugh et al, will be more likely to force candidates to stake out extreme positions which they will be unable to “Etch-a-Sketch” away after the primaries. The wingnut media are notoriously committed to the sort of ideological purity that voters find repugnant. What’s more, even if they got the sympathetic treatment they desire, it would only result in the candidates being woefully unprepared for the full-contact combat they will eventually encounter in the general election.
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
1. If they had a debate with Hannity, Levin, and Rush as moderators it would be the end of Republicans
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 05:53 AM
Oct 2015

At least as a national party.

People would see how insane they really are.

salin

(48,955 posts)
11. Leaving a large trail of video evidence of mass insanity
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 01:32 PM
Oct 2015

I can't believe their advisers are so far in the bubble that they don't realize how dangerous this would be for their candidates and party.

patricia92243

(12,603 posts)
3. Actually, they will be able to shine. All the question will be about or lead to how evil the other
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 07:59 AM
Oct 2015

side is. They EXCELL at this, and their base will consider they have been given "red meat." The candidate ignorance will never be uncovered, and the bases ignorance will be satisfied.


Shrike47

(6,913 posts)
7. Either that or broad platitudes anybody would agree with. "I'll make America great!"
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:24 AM
Oct 2015

They will do away with taxes but nobody who matters will suffer, and America will have a military so enormous and powerful that all foreign countries will do whatever we tell them to do.

Said by 10 candidates one after another.

And nobody asks how or for any specifics.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
5. Bunch of whiny, little loser-bunnies.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:03 AM
Oct 2015

[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.
[/center][/font][hr]
 

B Calm

(28,762 posts)
8. If they are afraid of conservative CNBC, what would they do in a national crisis? Thus
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 08:34 AM
Oct 2015

proof none of them are fit to be president.

C_U_L8R

(45,021 posts)
9. These things aren't debates
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:06 AM
Oct 2015

and its deceptive to describe them as such.
They're nothing more than beauty pageants
(with really heinous mean-spirited contestants).
None of these conservative clowns could stand
the heat of a real debate. I dare them to try.

Volaris

(10,274 posts)
10. No worries, one of them will get their shot eventually.
Sat Oct 31, 2015, 11:24 AM
Oct 2015

We're keeping the white house, there's almost no doubt .
If we're smart about how we go about it, we can get the Senate back, too.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Candidates Frightened...