General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo those arguing for the prosecution of Bush officials:
Are you prepared to call for prosecution of the Obama administration for their war crimes?
I am.
These drone strikes are not legal under US or International law. And that should be the end of that.
War crimes are war crimes no matter the perpetrator.
http://therealnews.com/t2/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=31&Itemid=74&jumival=10921
http://warcriminalswatch.org
http://www.worldcantwait.net/index.php/obama
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a14627/obama-lethal-presidency-0812/
Please read the entire esquire article. While not discussing war crimes per say, it does give one hell of a perspective on the cold lethality of the Obama administration.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)and a few who are free should be in jail.
In other words, I have no problem with putting war criminals in jail. No matter when they committed their crime.
Punx
(446 posts)Is Don Siegelman for starters.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The evidence speaks for itself. Whoever is responsible for the MSF bombing belongs in jail for a crime against humanity, no matter how highly placed.
SamKnause
(13,108 posts)Yes.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Obama's indifference to civilian casualties infuriates me.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)As does "venimus, vidimus, et mortuus est".
Damn the whole lot of them. Life is too precious to be wasted in such a horrible display of callousness.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)Silence on our part is consent.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Thank you. Powerful words.
Even if we don't jail them, we cannot allow this to be forgotten.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)I'll Google it.
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,678 posts)F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)First things first. We know Bush/Cheney approved of torture...good place to start.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)It might be possible to argue that some torture is still going on, but the widescale Abu-Graib stuff has beem shut down, as far as I know. The drone killings not only continue, but have escalated under Obama. Sadly, even Hillary and Bernie plan to continue this.
How to stop it? We appear to have no mechanism to top it except for the legal system, our political party is fully entrenched in the war on terror remote killing effort.
I have hope that Bernie would do less of it, but even he uses the drone program as a more acceptable alternative to boots on the ground.
Perhaps it would be foolish to simply cease the drone program altogether. My feeling is we need to disengage from Middle East conflicts, work crazy hard to retool our economy to get off of fossil fuels, and we will have less need for any kind of "kill them over there before they kill us over here" approach.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)He's not a socialist. That involves a lot of compromises with the war industry and imperialism.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)so it's hardly fair to be criticizing him in that regard. Good to push him to be better on it, I'm all for that.
Bernie strongly spoke out and voted against the Iraq war, and opposed the Patriot Act. He gets a lot of criticism for getting the fighter jet made in Vermont, but his reply to that, and I have seen no contrary evidence, is that he opposes the fighter, but once it was a done deal to build the fighter, he fought to have it built in Vermont because his constituents need jobs, so at that point he was just fighting to have the jobs in his state rather than someone else's state, and if that is correct I have no real problem with it.
He's truly one of the best we have when it comes to opposing the MIC, though for people like us that still isn't good enough and we should keep pressing on that issue, so long as we're not undermining his chances in favor of someone who is worse.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)....but he didn't.
Instead, he co-signed the War Crimes along with the rest of the Democratic Leadership.
That makes them ALL accessories to War Crimes......and probably why we will see no prosecutions unless we elect a 3rd Party.
The WARS now have bi-partisan ownership.
This will be an indelible blob in the middle of Obama's legacy.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)We've given him a break on this now for almost two-terms.
What are we going to do to get the Next Dem Administration to listen this?
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)Why should one take priority?
Only one has the ability to directly kill innocents right now.
LostOne4Ever
(9,290 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)so to will these unnecessary WARS follow Obama as HIS legacy for the rest of his life.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)Not quite the Lincoln he was publicly claiming he was shooting for.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)The law is the law- if it's not, then all of our posturing about any kind of values we have is hollow.
F4lconF16
(3,747 posts)/sarcasm
If one believes in a liberal interpretation of the law (and to be clear, I don't) one better make sure that the law applies equally to all.
Too bad that's pretty much impossible under liberalism.