Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

skip fox

(19,359 posts) Wed May 23, 2012, 02:21 PM May 2012

Bowling for Bucks. Please come CAPTION Eric (Fecal Farm) Bolling!!

Eric (Spud Nuts) Bolling is braying, "To be perfectly honest, I think Obama is raping the American public not only without buying us dinner but without using a condom. He's such a deviant, miscreant human, he'd spray us with his sp**ge and then leave without throwing us a towel to clean off his sp*nky stench. . . . Who would even think of such things but a cretinous lout???"

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Bowling for Bucks. Please come CAPTION Eric (Fecal Farm) Bolling!! (Original Post) skip fox May 2012 OP

Link? stevenleser May 2012 #1

CAPTIONs at DU are fanciful. Often the comic essence of the speaker's real words. skip fox May 2012 #2

Gotcha. I know Eric and have gone 1 on 1 with him a couple of times. stevenleser May 2012 #3

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)

1. Link?

Reply to skip fox (Original post)

Wed May 23, 2012, 02:23 PM

May 2012

skip fox

(19,359 posts)

2. CAPTIONs at DU are fanciful. Often the comic essence of the speaker's real words.

Reply to stevenleser (Reply #1)

Wed May 23, 2012, 02:30 PM

May 2012

This one begins rather accurately but then shows Bollings own mental sludge pit or mentality for thinking such a thing by extending what was said:

http://mediamatters.org/mmtv/201205220013

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)

3. Gotcha. I know Eric and have gone 1 on 1 with him a couple of times.

Reply to skip fox (Reply #2)

Wed May 23, 2012, 02:35 PM

May 2012

I just couldnt believe he would say something quite as out there as the OP.

Reply to this discussion