General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrice-gouging pharma bro under investigation for corporate looting, fraud and stalking
This isnt the first time Martin Shkreli, the most hated man on the Internet, has attracted criticism for his unscrupulous business dealings.
Shkreli has ignited a firestorm after purchasing the rights to Daraprim, a 62-year-old drug used for treating life-threatening parasitic infections in babies and AIDS patients, and raising the price overnight from $13.50 per tablet to $750.
<>
The company he founded in 2009 sued Shkreli last month for $65 million in damages, claiming the ex-hedge fund manager gave away Retrophin shares to friends and used the biotech firms assets to pay off personal debts and keep afloat his sinking investment firm, MSMB Capital Management.
A filing made in November 2014 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission showed Shkreli pulled in nearly $3 million in gross proceeds as he continued selling company stock while simultaneously urging investors to buy into Retrophin which the rapper-quoting then-CEO hyped on his Twitter account.
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/09/price-gouging-pharma-bro-under-investigation-for-corporate-looting-fraud-and-stalking/
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Seize all of his assets and waterboard him for the rest of his life.
Sorry, but they invented Hell for assholes like this.
KansDem
(28,498 posts)Last edited Tue Sep 22, 2015, 11:16 AM - Edit history (1)
from Wikipedia--
It is on the World Health Organization's List of Essential Medicines, the most important medications needed in a basic health system.[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pyrimethamine
And this f*cker jacks up the price over 5,000 percent?
Seize all of his assets -- Agreed. No one should profit from another's sickness or injury.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)randys1
(16,286 posts)Tommy_Carcetti
(43,184 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)That works for me.
About a dozen Hells Angels in steel toed motorcycle boots.
kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)government through grants, contracts, clinical trials. The government through it huge biomedical research are, the National Institutes of Health, funds most of the R&D yet phara companies claim they need to charge high prices to recoup
R&D expenditures, when in fact the taxpayer has already covered most of these costs. What the Pharma companies really are charging so much for is development, advertisement, and distribution. And then they get tax breaks for these. It's a system that needs to be looked at very closely including the connections between some drug companies, NIH researchers, and their licensing and patent rights after using tax-payer dollars to conduct the research. It is a bastardized system and has roots in the FDA-NIH-Patent Office-big Phara-AMA-Health Insurance companies. The evidence is out there. You just need some one to look at it and connect the dots.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)drug idea. Big pharma has been blaming the cost of research for the rising cost of drugs for years when all along it has been the taxpayers who have been paying the cost.
So much for her plan.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)issue out of this, but there will be no real reform.
This is why we need the Bernie revolution. There are so many areas where the corporations and Plutocrats have unfairly taken advantage of their fellow countrymen and remained above the law. The biggest and best way to solve most of these problems start by demanding Publicly Funded Elections, locking the "Revolving Door," busting up the Wall Street banks and media oligopolies, protecting the electronic voting system and restoring voting rights (exit polling to start), and getting Bernie and other like-minded candidates elected! All of this would return the power back to the people where it used to be and where it belongs.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)kelliekat44
(7,759 posts)At this point everything is rhetoric, talk, and promises.
Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)a great deal. On an individual issue there can be surprises or evolution, as the case may be, but on the whole I think we know how they would govern.
Obama on the other hand did not have a long record and surprised many of us being more conservative than we expected in certain areas. I attribute many of those conservative surprises on quid pro quo's for his big supporters.
This is how the game has been played in modern times, but the game has become very one-sided. I would use the analogy of a crooked football referee. It used to be he would only make a few bogus calls a game, such as holding on a key third down here or there, but over time it became several times a drive and so blatantly bad everyone could see he was completely wrong.
That is how our politics has become. It is time for the NFL to fire all of the referees, institute a lot more replays.... Bernie is calling for the overhaul now! It is so bad no one really even denies it now. We judge the strength of our candidates now by how much bribe money they have taken in, plus we "Supersized" it with Super Pacs!
sharp_stick
(14,400 posts)doesn't generally fund clinical trials unless the condition being treated by the drug in question can be considered an "orphan". That is a very serious condition that affects a very small proportion of of the population. The other time that the Government might fund a trial is if the drug has been developed by a non-profit institution, University or Government body like the NIH or CDC.
In 2012 more than 75% of all clinical trials were funded privately.
Most big Pharma companies don't apply for or receive Federal grants for research/development because any granting body immediately receives a portion of profit from any drug that makes it to market. All drug companies however take advantage of any of the R&D tax credits available.
Here's a simplistic but decent article from Berkeley.
http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/who_pays
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)from this asshole and others like him highlight the need for the healthcare industries in this country to be nationalized.
No one should go into life crushing debt because of an illness.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)because some investor wants to get richer. No TPP.
Iggo
(47,558 posts)If that happens to this guy, I will note how unfortunate it is right before I lose zero sleep over it.
eppur_se_muova
(36,271 posts)ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)not alone.
MynameisBlarney
(2,979 posts)an asskickin' to knock that fucking smirk off his face.
cstanleytech
(26,299 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)But they will put it off as long as possible by reformulating the drug to start the clock over on the patent. They'll make meaningless changes ("What would happen if we add Tylenol to this cancer drug?" , but still keep the precursor, which keeps making them money.
It's a racket.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)competitors to make.
christx30
(6,241 posts)It should be legal for another company to say, "Here's our $11 version of that guy's $750 per dose version."
hedgehog
(36,286 posts)by only one company - which can set any price it wants.
http://www.healthline.com/health-news/plaquenil-shortage-leaves-ra-lupus-patients-in-pain-030715#3
gcomeau
(5,764 posts)It's just that nobody else makes it so he has a monopoly.
niyad
(113,393 posts)ryan_cats
(2,061 posts)The most hated man on the Internets?
Does Cecil yet live?
Takket
(21,581 posts)He raised the pill to $750 per tablet? here's what he deserves..........
Take everything he has, except for $749, then infect him with the parasite this drug treats. Maybe then he'll understand the consequences to real people of price gouging.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)IDemo
(16,926 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Faux pas
(14,682 posts)low.
Javaman
(62,531 posts)instead of daisy his quest is only for money.