Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 03:50 PM Sep 2015

Should anyone ever be sentenced to death based upon the testimony of a single eyewitness

who cut a deal with the prosecution to save his own skin in exchange for his testimony?


9 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Yes
1 (11%)
No
8 (89%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should anyone ever be sentenced to death based upon the testimony of a single eyewitness (Original Post) Nye Bevan Sep 2015 OP
I don't think anyone should be sentenced to death, ever. Lyric Sep 2015 #1
That, too, but no one should be sentenced to anything Warpy Sep 2015 #7
Nobody should ever be sentenced to death. OnlinePoker Sep 2015 #2
I'm not completely anti-DP, but single eyewitness testimony is not enough. Throd Sep 2015 #3
I'd stop you immediately seven words into that question with a "No." Tommy_Carcetti Sep 2015 #4
Not without other irrefutable forensic evidence NV Whino Sep 2015 #5
The death penalty should be abolished worldwide. MineralMan Sep 2015 #6
Most of the world already has Major Nikon Sep 2015 #11
Even if a society accepts the death penalty, Ilsa Sep 2015 #8
no Liberal_in_LA Sep 2015 #9
No one should be sentenced to death, ever. Iggo Sep 2015 #10
Just for the record, that would be illegal under Sharia Law JCMach1 Sep 2015 #12

Warpy

(111,292 posts)
7. That, too, but no one should be sentenced to anything
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 04:23 PM
Sep 2015

on the testimony of a single eyewitness who is a stranger. Eyewitnesses are notoriously unreliable to the point that I plead poor eyesight when asked to give an eyewitness account of anything.

In the absence of forensic evidence, there should be no conviction. I know that's tough for mugging victims to take, but unless the guy is still toting the gun or knife he used to threaten them, no dice.

OnlinePoker

(5,723 posts)
2. Nobody should ever be sentenced to death.
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 03:52 PM
Sep 2015

It is state sanctioned murder, and I believe it is listed as homicide on the death certificates in some states.

Tommy_Carcetti

(43,185 posts)
4. I'd stop you immediately seven words into that question with a "No."
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 03:54 PM
Sep 2015

But "no" logically applies to the question as a whole as well.

MineralMan

(146,318 posts)
6. The death penalty should be abolished worldwide.
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 04:18 PM
Sep 2015

The state should not be executing people based on a jury's decision. Too much room for error. Wartime is a different situation.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
8. Even if a society accepts the death penalty,
Thu Sep 17, 2015, 04:24 PM
Sep 2015

Eyewitness testimony is unreliable unless the witness actually knows the person. And then you have to consider that person's motivation. If the witness doesn't know the perp, then identification becomes more difficult if they are different races.

Dr. Elizabeth Loftus did fantastic research on cognition and memory.

I vote No.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should anyone ever be sen...