General Discussion

NYCButterfinger

(755 posts) Wed Sep 16, 2015, 11:49 PM Sep 2015

Underestimate Carly Fiorina at your own risk.

She lost to Barbara Boxer in the 2010 Calif. Senate race because Boxer ran a better campaign and the issues was on Boxer's side, but Carly Fiorina is a pretty good debater in my opinion. If she is the VP choice for the Republicans, do not underestimate her because she can get nasty in a debate.

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Underestimate Carly Fiorina at your own risk. (Original Post) NYCButterfinger Sep 2015 OP

Ok. nt kelliekat44 Sep 2015 #1

We always have to fear something? DemocratSinceBirth Sep 2015 #2

In my opinion Florina did well in the CNN debate and should move up in the polls. ... spin Sep 2015 #3

Boxer didn't beat her. RandySF Sep 2015 #4

That crap about women don't deserve to be on the $20 or $10 oasis Sep 2015 #5

kelliekat44

(7,759 posts)

1. Ok. nt

Reply to NYCButterfinger (Original post)

Thu Sep 17, 2015, 12:02 AM

Sep 2015

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)

2. We always have to fear something?

Reply to kelliekat44 (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 17, 2015, 12:03 AM

Sep 2015

eom

spin

(17,493 posts)

3. In my opinion Florina did well in the CNN debate and should move up in the polls. ...

Reply to NYCButterfinger (Original post)

Thu Sep 17, 2015, 12:03 AM

Sep 2015

I doubt if she will win the Republican primary race but I agree that I might be underestimating her.

RandySF

(58,982 posts)

4. Boxer didn't beat her.

Reply to NYCButterfinger (Original post)

Thu Sep 17, 2015, 12:12 AM

Sep 2015

She dismantled her, and not just because it's California. We remember how she ran HP into the ditch out here. And, if she gets on the ticket, we'll remind America.

oasis

(49,393 posts)

5. That crap about women don't deserve to be on the $20 or $10

Reply to NYCButterfinger (Original post)

Thu Sep 17, 2015, 12:25 AM

Sep 2015

Because they shouldn't be thought of as a special interest group will come back to bite her in the ass.

Reply to this discussion