Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 02:14 PM Sep 2015

National Geographic magazine shifts to for-profit status with Fox partnership

The National Geographic magazine, a nonprofit publication since its founding in 1888, will shift to for-profit status under a new partnership with 21st Century Fox, the entertainment company controlled by the family of Rupert Murdoch, the two partners said this morning.

The partnership, which will also include the National Geographic cable channel and the National Geographic Society’s other media assets, will be called National Geographic Partners. Fox will own 73 percent of the partnership, and Washington-based National Geographic Society will own the balance. Fox will pay $725 million to the Society for its stake in the partnership. This will push the Society’s endowment to more than $1 billion.

The monthly magazine, with its famous yellow-bordered cover, has been owned since its inception by the National Geographic Society of Washington, the educational and scientific organization based in Washington that has been a philanthropic organization from its beginning.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/style/national-geographic-magazine-shifts-to-for-profit-status-with-fox-partnership/2015/09/09/7c9f034e-56f0-11e5-8bb1-b488d231bba2_story.html

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
National Geographic magazine shifts to for-profit status with Fox partnership (Original Post) Ichingcarpenter Sep 2015 OP
They lost me when their TV channel started making movies of Bill Oreilly's books. progressoid Sep 2015 #1
Well, that is absolutely sh-tty Xyzse Sep 2015 #2
Their TV shows have too much psuedo science for me. Nt Logical Sep 2015 #3
They've been running MurrayDelph Sep 2015 #8
Har har. It is to laugh. Octafish Sep 2015 #4
I look for the NatGeo Channel to go on the decline then. lpbk2713 Sep 2015 #5
It is already pretty much there, imo. yellowcanine Sep 2015 #7
They have adopted Reality TV just as the History Channel has. yellowcanine Sep 2015 #6
. Omaha Steve Sep 2015 #9

lpbk2713

(42,766 posts)
5. I look for the NatGeo Channel to go on the decline then.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 02:36 PM
Sep 2015



More stories about the Duck Dynasty assholes, and Palin, and Tedophile and Jindol.

I used to tune in fairly often. I don't expect to do it much longer.

Faux has the Midas touch. Everything they touch they turn to shit.

yellowcanine

(35,701 posts)
6. They have adopted Reality TV just as the History Channel has.
Wed Sep 9, 2015, 02:39 PM
Sep 2015

Lot of crap about wannabe Euell Gibbons types living out in the woods, chopping down trees, etc.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»National Geographic magaz...