Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 06:00 PM Sep 2015

Is there a "safe haven" for vegetarians, vegans, and healthy eating?

Those topics seem to invite hostility (and locked threads) in groups under the "health" topic, which is odd given that the leading causes of death in the west are attributable to our diet. That would seem to be related to "health", yet is apparently not a welcome subject of discussion.

37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is there a "safe haven" for vegetarians, vegans, and healthy eating? (Original Post) Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 OP
Yep. There is in the Environment and Energy section. stillwaiting Sep 2015 #1
Yes. LeftyMom Sep 2015 #2
You need to come over here: mucifer Sep 2015 #3
Yeah, when it comes to wolfing down industrially-provided food, D"U" seems fairly right-leaning, villager Sep 2015 #4
Fortunately, the tiny group of GMO pushers roody Sep 2015 #35
GD. KamaAina Sep 2015 #5
If you're not willing to challenge your viewpoints, why bother with "discussion." HuckleB Sep 2015 #6
What "challenge" do you think is sensible against a stand of not eating fauna? "Oh, just have ONE"? WinkyDink Sep 2015 #14
What's to debate? MoonRiver Sep 2015 #15
Yep-- I heard an author talking about that very phenomenon recently. Marr Sep 2015 #28
We have a Vegetarian, Vegan, and Animal Rights group. Codeine Sep 2015 #7
Thanks for all the replies. I will check it out. n/t Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #8
I do eat/consume a few vegetarian-vegan items Omaha Steve Sep 2015 #9
It's to laugh now, but I assure you, your innards don't think it's hilarious. And I'm a salt-snack WinkyDink Sep 2015 #13
I have a vegan relative. Archae Sep 2015 #10
Anecdotes without supporting documentation are valueless Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #17
Yeah and when I went vegan for a while justiceischeap Sep 2015 #22
And the lady next door awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #23
I would agree with the statement about anecdotal evidence sue4e3 Sep 2015 #33
Your questions seems to assume the "health eating" is a clearly defined thing... Silent3 Sep 2015 #11
Absolutely. trotsky Sep 2015 #12
I see what you did there... Glassunion Sep 2015 #24
Thank you for providing an example of what the OP was talking about. eom uppityperson Sep 2015 #29
I don't know. I am not opposed to those, as I tend to think whatever makes people happy is fine. Xyzse Sep 2015 #16
In my experience, when one posts in GD the people most likely to respond early are those who disagre GreatGazoo Sep 2015 #18
Wherever there is a punch bowl awoke_in_2003 Sep 2015 #25
How about the cooking group? cwydro Sep 2015 #19
livetohike is a vegetarian fizzgig Sep 2015 #20
Yeah, I don't spend as much time there as I should. cwydro Sep 2015 #21
You were locked in Health because your post and its video Warpy Sep 2015 #26
That's not all. I got personal hate mail and was told I was "unethical" for advocating for good diet Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #30
OK, now you lost me. Warpy Sep 2015 #31
That was the reaction of physicians when the AMA published that fact. Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #32
This is like asking if there is a safe haven for giants, tall people and accountants whatthehey Sep 2015 #27
Any 'system' of eating is doomed to fail. randome Sep 2015 #34
People are actually hostile to vegetarians here? I do not understand that. Tipperary Sep 2015 #36
Not here, but in the "health" group. n/t Binkie The Clown Sep 2015 #37

mucifer

(23,550 posts)
3. You need to come over here:
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 06:12 PM
Sep 2015
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1131

I do however think that the group is more about being veg for animal rights reasons and not necessarily health reasons. But, check it out and see what you think.
 

villager

(26,001 posts)
4. Yeah, when it comes to wolfing down industrially-provided food, D"U" seems fairly right-leaning,
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 06:16 PM
Sep 2015

....overall.

But that particular DU group, as noted, is a good place for such discussions...

HuckleB

(35,773 posts)
6. If you're not willing to challenge your viewpoints, why bother with "discussion."
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 07:21 PM
Sep 2015

"Safe havens" seem to be creating whole communities of people who simply mimic one another, and do not tolerate questions. It's not healthy. Hey, you brought up health.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
14. What "challenge" do you think is sensible against a stand of not eating fauna? "Oh, just have ONE"?
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:09 AM
Sep 2015

Do you suppose a change in principle or philosophy is either desirable or logical?

It is not the equivalent of asking a steak-lover to eat his broccoli. NOBODY EVER has taken a moral stance against eating vegetables. A STUBBORN stance, perhaps; even an ignorant one. But principled? Yeah, no.

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
15. What's to debate?
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:14 AM
Sep 2015

Eating unhealthy food is one's right. And people who want to discuss their healthy eating choices, have a right to do so. Poster was just asking where this can be done on DU.

 

Marr

(20,317 posts)
28. Yep-- I heard an author talking about that very phenomenon recently.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:59 PM
Sep 2015

Can't recall who it was... I remember she'd been writing about history and politics for several decades and is widely regarded in her field. She said that in recent years, speaking engagements have become less and less forums of different sorts of people and more and more echo chambers, filled with people who came to hear their views reaffirmed, rather than challenged.

I put it down to the internet and political radio, personally. We've made it very easy for people to isolate themselves into little bubbles in which they never have to hear even their most trivial opinions challenged.

 

WinkyDink

(51,311 posts)
13. It's to laugh now, but I assure you, your innards don't think it's hilarious. And I'm a salt-snack
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:08 AM
Sep 2015

fan.

Archae

(46,337 posts)
10. I have a vegan relative.
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 11:13 PM
Sep 2015

And she is constantly getting sick.

We are fucking omnivores, eating meant and veggies.

And so far, vegans are like fundy evangelists, making it sound like we are "unholy.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
17. Anecdotes without supporting documentation are valueless
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 12:24 PM
Sep 2015

Is she a potato chip and Coca Cola vegan?

The word "vegan" covers a very broad range of eating habits, many of which are, indeed, very unhealthy. Unless you are prepared to provide specifics both about her diet, and about the kinds of maladies she's prone to, there is no real information in what you're telling us.

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
22. Yeah and when I went vegan for a while
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 02:04 PM
Sep 2015

I had an overactive thyroid that I had to take daily medication for. I now have a regularly functioning thyroid. Was it a coincidence? Probably but if you can claim being vegan makes your relative sick, I can claim being vegan cured me of hyperthyroidism. I can also honestly say that when I was vegan, I never caught a cold or had the flu (I was vegan for 5 years) but was prone to seasonal colds prior to going vegan. See how that works?

 

awoke_in_2003

(34,582 posts)
23. And the lady next door
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 09:53 PM
Sep 2015

is 80+ years old, and spry enough to get out and play with her great grandchildren. She is a lifetime vegetarian. Anecdotal evidence is just that- anecdotal.

sue4e3

(731 posts)
33. I would agree with the statement about anecdotal evidence
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:26 AM
Sep 2015

but having said that, if we were to classify humans like we do other animals we would be classified as omnivores. If we're omnivores (and we are) that strongly suggests that our bodies function better with meat and vegetables. I'm sure there is always exceptions to that rule. I know a lot of vegetarians argue we are not omnivores by nature if you ask most scientists(biologist, zoologist, life scientist,ethologist, dietitians, ect.. ) directly they will say we are . I know I have spent Quite a bit of time hunting diet answers . I don't believe meat has anything to do with being unhealthy , may be what we feed the meat or do to the environment that our food has to live in before we eat it might contribute to our health. I believe it is processed foods and sugar, Considering before the 1940s heart disease wasn't a common occurrence. I would say cancer wasn't as prevalent but that was brought on by a whole separate situation

Silent3

(15,230 posts)
11. Your questions seems to assume the "health eating" is a clearly defined thing...
Wed Sep 2, 2015, 11:34 PM
Sep 2015

...and that anyone who challenges what you think "health eating" means doesn't merely have a different idea of what it means, but is inexplicably an enemy of "health eating".

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
16. I don't know. I am not opposed to those, as I tend to think whatever makes people happy is fine.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:26 AM
Sep 2015

Stating that, people's choice of food is their own personal choice.

The idea is, to try not to be offensive to any one. There are cultures that have very deep importance in food and its propriety as well as how things should go.

I must state that I am an omnivore who loves food.
I enjoy vegetables, meats and everything else. I will not force any one to eat what they do not want, and if I host a dinner, I do ask the guests involved what their preferences are, and what they won't eat, so that I can at least prepare for it. Otherwise, I just do what I want.

Clinton turned towards vegan/vegetarian eating to keep himself healthy, and he's looking great. In fact, I worship in the shrine of Tony Horton, and he's that way too.

It is very hard to do, at least for me due to time constraints and the fact is, my goals are not the same as theirs.

I think that if we avoid sanctimony in regards to eating, it should be fine. People get defensive about their eating preferences.

GreatGazoo

(3,937 posts)
18. In my experience, when one posts in GD the people most likely to respond early are those who disagre
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:00 PM
Sep 2015

disagree. True across many subjects and themes. Anything health related tends to bring out a predictable collection of "science" trolls.

Eating is very personal to some and simply an emotionally loaded subject to many others. Many reactions say more about the poster than the subject at hand or the OP.

Good luck.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
19. How about the cooking group?
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:17 PM
Sep 2015

I'm not a vegetarian, although I eat meat only rarely.

I know I'd love to get some vegetarian recipes! I'm a vegetable freak lol!

fizzgig

(24,146 posts)
20. livetohike is a vegetarian
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:49 PM
Sep 2015

her menus always look fantastic. and i agree c&b would be an appropriate place for the cooking side of the discussion.

 

cwydro

(51,308 posts)
21. Yeah, I don't spend as much time there as I should.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 01:52 PM
Sep 2015

I love the cooking group folks!

Never been disappointed when I ask for help.

Warpy

(111,276 posts)
26. You were locked in Health because your post and its video
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:37 PM
Sep 2015

suggested diet could be substituted for medical care. You will find people who feel that way in http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1220 Vegetarianism and recipe sharing can be found at http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=forum&id=1131



Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
30. That's not all. I got personal hate mail and was told I was "unethical" for advocating for good diet
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 11:37 PM
Sep 2015

Those people are real fanatics for preserving the status quo, even after that status quo has been shown to be nonsense.

I'll bet they would have been against Lister for advocating washing one's hand between performing an autopsy and doing surgery. The conventional wisdom of the time was that there was no need to clean your hands before doing surgery. And surgeons fought against that idea, just like they fight today against acknowledging the role that diet plays in the "diseases of civilization". The fact that heart disease is non-existent in cultures that eat vegan is ignored because "they already know" that diet has no effect. It's what they learned in that one single overview course they took on diet in the whole of their medical training.

This is especially critical given that doctors are the third leading cause of death in the U.S.



Warpy

(111,276 posts)
31. OK, now you lost me.
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 11:53 PM
Sep 2015

First of all, it was Semmelweiss with the handwashing. Second, doctors are not the third cause of death. If that were the case, people would have had a much higher life expectancy in the Middle Ages when there were no doctors, only food, fasting, herbs and prayer.

So good luck with your misinformed, disinformed, and half informed quacks.

You are going to need it. Bye.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
32. That was the reaction of physicians when the AMA published that fact.
Fri Sep 4, 2015, 12:02 AM
Sep 2015

Don't call information "misinformation" unless you know what you're talking about.

Sources:

Is US health really the best in the world? Starfield B1. JAMA. 2000 Jul 26;284(4):483-5.

Barbara Starfield: Passage of the Pathfinder of Primary Care. K C Stange. Ann Fam Med. 2011 Jul; 9(4): 292–296.

Managing medical mistakes: ideology, insularity and accountability among internists-in-training. T Mizrahi. Soc Sci Med. 1984;19(2):135-46.

The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies. A K Jha, I Larizgoitia, C Audera-Lopez, N Prasopa-Plaizier, H Waters, D W Bates.

Five years after To Err Is Human: what have we learned? L L Leape, D M Berwick. JAMA. 2005 May 18;293(19):2384-90.

Effects of health care provider work hours and sleep deprivation on safety and performance. S W Lockley, L K Barger, N T Ayas, J M Rothschild, C A Czeizler, C P Landrigan: Harvard Work Hours, Health and Safety Group. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2007 Nov;33(11 Suppl) -18.

Resident duty-hour restrictions-who are we protecting?: AOA critical issues. T Peabody, S Nestler, C Marx, V Pellegrini. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012 Sep 5;94(17):e131.

The Starfield revelation: medically caused death in America

At the Intersection of Health, Health Care and Policy. C Hawn. Health Affairs, 28, no.2 (2009):361-368. https://obssr.od.nih.gov/issh/2012/files/network_analysis_readings/Hawn%202009.pdf

Chronicle of an Unforetold Death. N A Holtzman. ARCH INTERN MED/ VOL 172 (NO. 15), AUG 13/27, 2012.

Error in medicine. L L Leape. JAMA. 1994 Dec 21;272(23):1851-7.

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
27. This is like asking if there is a safe haven for giants, tall people and accountants
Thu Sep 3, 2015, 10:53 PM
Sep 2015

One of these things is not like the others....

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
34. Any 'system' of eating is doomed to fail.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 08:38 AM
Sep 2015

Isn't 'being vegetarian' the same as labeling or substituting rules for free thinking? The only sensible thing to do in regards to diet is to, um, eat sensibly.

We already know how to live a long and healthy life and most choose not to. Pity.

We are too addicted to the easy arousal of our taste buds.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]The truth doesn’t always set you free.
Sometimes it builds a bigger cage around the one you’re already in.
[/center][/font][hr]

 

Tipperary

(6,930 posts)
36. People are actually hostile to vegetarians here? I do not understand that.
Sun Sep 6, 2015, 02:01 PM
Sep 2015

I guess I have not seen those threads.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is there a "safe hav...