Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOnline comments hurt science understanding, study finds
http://www.jsonline.com/news/health/online-comments-hurt-science-understanding-study-finds-ib88cor-185610641.html"University of Wisconsin-Madison researchers.
The new study reports that not only are just 12% of Americans turning to newspaper and magazine websites for science news, but when they do they may be influenced as much by the comments at the end of the story as they are by the report itself.
In an experiment mentioned in the Science paper and soon to be published elsewhere in greater detail, about 2,000 people were asked to read a balanced news report about nanotechnology followed by a group of invented comments. All saw the same report but some read a group of comments that were uncivil, including name-calling. Others saw more civil comments.
"Disturbingly, readers' interpretations of potential risks associated with the technology described in the news article differed significantly depending only on the tone of the manipulated reader comments posted with the story," wrote authors Dominique Brossard and Dietram A. Scheufele.
..."
Alas, this is not surprising.
(Yeah, I know it's a bit dated, but it's still valid information.)
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 605 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Online comments hurt science understanding, study finds (Original Post)
HuckleB
Sep 2015
OP
Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)1. The implication is that our thoughts and impressions of the issues
are also manipulated by the posts we read here on DU.
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)3. That certainly seems plausible if the the findings are correct.
This is probably something that should be replicated, of course.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)2. This is why anti-Gmo and Anti-Vaxxer nonsense is pervasive.
EOM.
eom
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)5. Post hoc ergo prompter hoc.
Post hoc ergo prompter hoc.
QED