Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWell well well... Look what the head honchos of Dole did to rip off shareholders
Judge Says Top Dole Execs Owe Shareholders $148M For Driving Down Companys Stock Price Before Buyout
CEO and chairman of the board David H. Murdock, and the companys former chief operating officer, C. Michael Carter fraudulently drove down their companys stock price so they could shortchange shareholders and buy the business on the cheap.
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of Delawares Court of Chancery ordered Murdock and Carter to reimburse shareholders $148 million, reports the New York Times. His decision [PDF] comes after a February trial prompted by shareholders in the company, who didnt think Murdocks deal to buy the 60% of the company he didnt own in 2013 was entirely on the up-and-up.
Before coming to the table with a deal for shareholders, Vice Chancellor Laster said Carter had misstated how much Dole could earn if it were to sell of some of its businesses, and canceled a stock buyback program.
That drove down the valuation of the stock, the judge said in his decision. Murdock at first offered $12 per share, which was negotiated up to $13.50 per share after an independent board committee checked out the deal.
Carter then gave the committee a set of artificially low management projects, while at the same time delivering a much more accurate picture to potential lenders involved in the takeover bid.
http://consumerist.com/2015/08/27/judge-says-top-dole-execs-owe-shareholders-148m-for-driving-down-companys-stock-price-before-buyout/
Vice Chancellor J. Travis Laster of Delawares Court of Chancery ordered Murdock and Carter to reimburse shareholders $148 million, reports the New York Times. His decision [PDF] comes after a February trial prompted by shareholders in the company, who didnt think Murdocks deal to buy the 60% of the company he didnt own in 2013 was entirely on the up-and-up.
Before coming to the table with a deal for shareholders, Vice Chancellor Laster said Carter had misstated how much Dole could earn if it were to sell of some of its businesses, and canceled a stock buyback program.
That drove down the valuation of the stock, the judge said in his decision. Murdock at first offered $12 per share, which was negotiated up to $13.50 per share after an independent board committee checked out the deal.
Carter then gave the committee a set of artificially low management projects, while at the same time delivering a much more accurate picture to potential lenders involved in the takeover bid.
Man, it seems no one is honest anymore.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 1337 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (15)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Well well well... Look what the head honchos of Dole did to rip off shareholders (Original Post)
dixiegrrrrl
Aug 2015
OP
So that should prove their only concern is a few good ole boys in the Board Room.
lpbk2713
Aug 2015
#6
arcane1
(38,613 posts)1. But we need super-high executive salaries in order to attract the best people!
Octafish
(55,745 posts)2. ENRON Business Model Rules
So the schmucks at Dole got caught?
Next!
nichomachus
(12,754 posts)3. So we can add defrauding stockholders
to their long history of torture, murder, overthrowing governments, owning politicians, etc. They make the Mafia look like the Red Cross.
cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)4. The naked greed so many have today is stupefying.
I mean, whats the difference if you make 20 million on the deal or 30 million if you lie about it?
To someone like that 10 million isn't a lot of money. Is it a pathological need?
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)5. The essence of Pirate Capitalism in five brief paragraphs.
Well, come to think of it, that's unfair.
To pirates.
Pirates made no bones about the fact that they were going to rob their victims blind and bragged about the fact beforehand. There was never any doubt about a pirate's intentions.
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)7. Indeed. n/t
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)6. So that should prove their only concern is a few good ole boys in the Board Room.
Themselves.
Everyone else is just there for them to make money off of.
That is today's business ethic.
Angry Dragon
(36,693 posts)8. sounds like fraud to me ............ how come they are not in jail??
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)10. 'Cause they're rich and white?
Sam_Fields
(305 posts)9. But, But the private sector is much more honest then the government guys.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)11. And government should be run like a business, so they say.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)12. And these are the "best talent" out there? Top Sociopaths,
I'd say, who know how to swindle!