General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm sorry, she's FAKING, there is no effin' way Coulter is THIS batshit crazy. NO EFFIN' WAY.
by Josh Feldman | 7:57 pm, August 25th, 2015
http://www.mediaite.com/tv/ann-coulter-rails-against-speech-nazis-at-trump-rally/
Ann Coulter introduced Donald Trump at his rally in Iowa today, and she had a lot to say about their mutual favorite subject: immigration.
Coulter backed up Trump on the issue of deporting immigrants, even the ones with anchor babies. She mocked the liberal media for considering that a controversial statement and calling them speech Nazis.
She expressed her gratefulness to Trump that the media is actually talking about this issue and sanctuary cities and the border wall (I love the idea of the Great Wall of Trump), and declared, I have not had this much hope for America since November 7th, 2012.
She surmised that maybe it was destiny that Mitt Romney lost and the GOP betrayed the right on immigration to pave the way for President Donald Trump.
joshcryer
(62,270 posts)This has long been known.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)the infamous "broken clock" award that seems to go to conservatives when one happens to agree with them on an issue.
Hoppy
(3,595 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)they are broken. Younger folks may not understand the 'broken clock' analogy in the future.
Arkansas Granny
(31,517 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,984 posts)jberryhill
(62,444 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)You obviously still do not understand that it's those "illegals" and "anchor babies" that are the big issues of our time. If we can deal with those foreigner-based issues, our problems will be solved and our middle class will be healthy again.
No sir! No distraction and fear-mongering going on here.
Stinky The Clown
(67,799 posts)The very notion of expelling "illegals" smacks of the Nazi actions against Jews, Gypsies, gays, and others. Using the word in the way she dis deflects use of the word toward her and T Rump.
leftofcool
(19,460 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)Disagree with somebody? Or just don't like them? Wanna marginalize them?
Pull out the ol' nazi analogy. Or just liken them to Hitler. Same difference.
I see it right here at DU on a fairly regular basis.
pampango
(24,692 posts)tularetom
(23,664 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)Gypsies, etc. though he did identify them as the enemy of the 'real' German people as part of his RW populist appeal to voters.
Overuse of the analogy can happen but we should remember that the 'historical horrors' of Nazi Germany grew over time. Most, not all, of the concentration camps were opened after the start of WWII. They did not emerge full blast when he first came to power in 1933.
If DU had existed in 1933, some might have looked at Hitler as a blowhard, RW populist who identified imaginary enemies in order to get elected but few could possibly have predicted the degree of 'historical horrors' that he perpetrated. Of course, there have been many "blowhard, RW populists" since 1933 who have identified imaginary enemies in order to get elected, including at least one ambitious republican presidential candidate, but none of them turned into 'Hitler'.
Does that mean we should refrain from referencing Hitler every time a new 'blowhard, RW populist' emerges on the scene in a country? Perhaps it does since the odds that any of them will turn into another "Hitler" is extremely small. But it is not an open-and-shut case.
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)The Sesame Street word on the street is "hyperbole".
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)It's her schtick, and she's milking it for all it's worth.
rocktivity
(44,576 posts)rocktivity
Vinca
(50,273 posts)either she's got another of her hate-mongering books coming out and needs the publicity or she's hedging her bets that Trump wins and wants to be press secretary. Either way, she's in it for herself and will say whatever is necessary.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)It's "Adios America," an anti-immigration screed, which she wants to flog. Trump's positions promote her book quite nicely.
Vinca
(50,273 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)marmar
(77,081 posts)Like an obnoxious barking dog, she's best ignored.
Captain Stern
(2,201 posts)I think she pretty much always has been.
Her whole shtick through the years has been to say the 'crazy', 'outrageous', things that the republican politicians wouldn't dare say out loud.
Unfortunately for her, her act is drying up......because over the last few years, the republicans are saying those things out loud. It's getting where it's almost impossible for her to make up some ridiculous bullshit that the likes of Cruz, Bachmann, Gohmert, etc. wouldn't actually say for the record.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)Or she's insane and maybe both!
Matrosov
(1,098 posts)They say what they think the audience wants to hear. They're entertainers and not political analysts. Their audience is too dumb to figure it out however
I'd go so far as to say even Trump doesn't really believe half the insanity he says, but he knows there's a large part of the population that loves to hear that kind of insanity.
brewens
(13,588 posts)to the bank.
Rex
(65,616 posts)There are a lot of RL trolls that make their money by pissing off millions.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)And any time she appears in public she's always in marketing mode.
Javaman
(62,530 posts)who doesn't care whom she shills for or how she shills, as long as it gets her face time.
trying her best to keep her dying career alive.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)if she doesn't make a splash?