Joe Lieberman: He's ba-a-a-ack!

[annabanana]

from an email from MoveOn:

Senator Chuck Schumer—would-be Democratic Leader in the Senate, and the only Democratic senator to publicly oppose the Iran deal so far—is feeling the heat. Politico reports that "with liberal groups furious over his opposition to the Iran nuclear deal, Sen. Chuck Schumer has been quietly reaching out to dozens of his colleagues to explain his decision" and assure them he won't lobby them to join his side.

And in recognition that Schumer is against the ropes politically, a group backed by hawkish billionaires—and headed by none other than the pro-war former senator Joe Lieberman—has bought a video billboard in Times Square to support him.
Every undecided Democrat, from Senator Cory Booker to Representative Jerry Nadler, is watching what happens to Schumer. They're trying to figure out whether there's more political risk in supporting the deal—or opposing it.

There's an amazing story about the group that bought the pro-Schumer billboard, a story that tells you everything you need to know about this fight.

The organization, United Against Nuclear Iran (UANI), used to be chaired by Gary Samore, a nuclear expert who runs a security program at Harvard. During negotiations with Iran, he was skeptical. But according to an article in today's New York Times, after the Iran deal was finalized, Samore took a hard look at the text—and wound up supporting it. If you want to keep Iran nuclear-free, supporting the deal is the best path to do it.

But that put him on the wrong side of the group he chaired, which was funded in no small part by ultra-right-wing pro-war billionaire Sheldon Adelson. So Samore stepped down. And into his chair slid Joe Lieberman, the Iraq War's #1 Democratic cheerleader—and the target of a MoveOn-supported primary campaign in 2006 that cost him the Democratic nomination for his Senate seat.

Lieberman, predictably, opposes the Iran deal. And under Lieberman's leadership, UANI wasted no time in coming to the aid of Sen. Schumer, who was facing a wall of criticism from progressives, just as Lieberman had a decade ago.
The fallout from Schumer's decision will shape the future of the Democratic Party, the country, and the Middle East. Everyone's watching. That's why we have to lean in to this fight—and respond to the pro-war billboard in a way that can't be missed.
If we can raise the funds this week, we can buy an anti-war billboard in Times Square, and buy online ads to make sure that swing voters across America see our message. Can you chip in $3?

https://pol.moveon.org/contrib/nowar_billboard.html?bg_id=hpc3&id=128538-2669252-0NYxwVx&t=115

We didn't stop the last war. We'll all have to live with that—those of us who didn't lose our lives to it. But we can stop this one.

[GoneFishin]

1. Lieberman is a stain on the Democratic Party. It makes my schizophrenic to know he was Gore's

running mate.

As much as I would have given anything for Gore to be President rather than Junior, I shudder to think that Lieberman was that close to the Presidency and that Democrats would have taken the blame for all the shit he would have done to the country given the opportunity.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

5. Forget the Democratic Party, Lieberman is an embarrassment to the human race!

[GoneFishin]

9. I stand corrected.

[The Wizard]

2. Schumer and Lieberman

Like those Adleson / AIPAC bribes.

[Demeter]

3. You are known by the company you keep

and I won't keep company with either Schumer or Lieberman.

[JackInGreen]

4. Someone let that lich out of his crypt?

FFS Ash, the words were Klatu Barada Nikto....now we get to deal with this shit bird again.

[Mike Nelson]

6. Lieberman will not help...

Schumer with those opposing him. He should have called Joe and said, "You're name is not going to help me with progressive Obama supporters."

[justhanginon]

7. From Anabana's post;

"Every undecided Democrat, from Senator Cory Booker to Representative Jerry Nadler, is watching what happens to Schumer. They're trying to figure out whether there's more political risk in supporting the deal—or opposing it."

In other words, they don't give a flying fook about our country. To them, depending on how they vote, only what would be the political cost to them. And that sums up our whorish congress in a nutshell.

[davidpdx]

8. Doesn't surprise me a bit. The guy is a leech

Groups like this will use Citizen's United to try to bully Congresspeople into voting against the Iran deal. It wasn't that surprising Schumer came out against the deal, but certainly Adelson and Lieberman are going to try to scare other D's into voting against this.

If we don't ban the special interest money soon our nation is going to be in a lot of trouble.

[MisterP]

10. and don't forget what happened after he lost the Dem primary

[annabanana]

14. yep.. Sore Loserman. . .n/t

[DFW]

11. I know Jerry Nadler

I haven't talked with him since the deal was announced, but I'm pretty sure of two things: he's for the deal, and 85% of the people in his district are against it. It's not a position I'd want to be in. I really don't want to lose his voice in Congress.

[hifiguy]

12. Like a belch from a bad onion

that is repeating on you.

A crusty little shitstain in the shorts of the US body politic.

[Liberal_Dog]

13. Oh Joy

I'm just so gosh-darned happy.

No.

Not really.