General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRepublicans make their incredibly unpopular abortion position crystal clear
By Paul Waldman August 10 at 12:30 PM
With all the talk about Donald Trump and Megyn Kelly, people might not have noticed that there was quite a bit of discussion of abortion in Thursdays Republican debate, and that discussion is continuing through today. While it wouldnt be accurate to say the party and its candidates are moving to the right, whats happening is that theyre making clear just how far to the right they are.
One moment in the debate that may have struck some as odd occurred when Marco Rubio got a question about him supporting exceptions for rape and incest victims to abortion bans, and he insisted that he supports no such thing. Mike Huckabee declared that I think the next president ought to invoke the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution now that we clearly know that that baby inside the mothers womb is a person at the moment of conception. Scott Walker went even further, stating his opposition to exceptions to save the life of the pregnant woman (Ive said many a time that that unborn child can be protected, and there are many other alternatives that can also protect the life of that mother). Walker recently signed a ban on abortions after 20 weeks, which did contain an exception to save the life of the mother, but no exceptions for rape or incest.
This is a deeply unpopular position, to say the least. When pollsters ask whether people think that rape and incest victims should be able to get abortions, more than 80 percent will say yes, including majorities of Republicans (there are some examples here). Between 60 and 70 percent are against overturning Roe v. Wade, a position on which Republicans are united. And the GOP platform has for some time called for a complete ban on abortion without any exceptions.
Rubio in particular is attempting to take a radical position and present it as the soul of thoughtful moderation. Yesterday, he went on Meet the Press and clarified that he has supported legislation with rape and incest exceptions because Ill support any legislation that reduces the number of abortions, and if that means voting for a ban that contains those exceptions, hell go along. But I dont think Rubio is quite telling the truth on that point. For instance, I doubt hed support legislation that mandates comprehensive and fact-based sex education and does away with the farce of abstinence only which would absolutely reduce the number of abortions. What he really means is that hell support any legislation that reduces abortion by restricting womens reproductive rights.
more
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2015/08/10/republicans-make-their-incredibly-unpopular-abortion-position-crystal-clear/?
riversedge
(70,267 posts)stay away from the polls.