General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDick Dale has single payer and spends $3000/month to stay alive
If anyone is curious why there is skepticism about expanding Medicare to all:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/03/1408454/-Legendary-guitarist-forced-to-stay-on-tour-to-pay-his-medical-expenses
Dick Dale (think the crazy surf guitar solo in "Pulp Fiction" is still touring at the age of 78 because he has to pay $3K / month for his medical expenses.
He's 78, so he's on Medicare.
You know, the single payer system we want to expand to everyone.
I think there's more to this story and that a national insurance system like Medicare is probably a good idea, but this is a horrible story for us to lead with.
daleanime
(17,796 posts)but we have a long, long way to go.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Perhaps his wife is not on Medicare yet due to age. Something isn't right though.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)She may not even be 50. Even so, she should be able to get SSI or SSDI and Medicare if she is disabled by her MS.
dofus
(2,413 posts)his situation particularly sad. He does have a long list of health issues, so much so that I'm rather surprised he can possibly get out of bed to perform.
Medicare really is a good system for most of its enrollees. This just points out how much more needs to be done, how we should be absolutely capping anyone's costs, no matter if they're on Medicare or totally uninsured.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)per month.
It sounds like he's just not good with his money. He went through an expensive divorce several years ago that took all his cash, but he still owns 80 acres of land near Palm Springs.
dofus
(2,413 posts)Hope someone advises him to do so.
Rex
(65,616 posts)RWing garbage to post in GD. Let him keep pretending medicare and single payer are the same thing.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)Can he get Medigap from an Affordable Health Care website?
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)You have to buy them when you enroll on Medicare at age 65. After that, they may not accept your application and even if they do accept you, there may be a waiting period of 6 months to cover pre existing conditions. The best time to enroll is within 6 months of your 65th birthday.
cbdo2007
(9,213 posts)it isn't going to solve 90% of the complaints people here on DU have about Health Insurance/Health Care.
KG
(28,751 posts)thanks for playing though.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Also, thanks for playing.
demigoddess
(6,641 posts)Medicare covers hospitalization, you have to buy insurance to cover office visits which is Part B. Medications, Part D is mostly paid for. that is what I understand, but I am an ignoramus
Recursion
(56,582 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Like all concern trolls do.
Rex
(65,616 posts)As if some of us long time posters didn't notice.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)But look at all those shiny new F-35s!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Seriously.
Here's a man with a medical need, and it costs him $3000/month to stay alive.
He's on Medicare, the single-payer system we want to expand to everyone.
How do we convince people they won't face this problem?
Cleita
(75,480 posts)publish this hit piece and immediately go to trashing single payer? I don't know why this guy pays that unless he's too dumb to pay for a medigap policy. The facts that aren't mentioned in this article are pretty telling. Also, it seems to come from a website that is announcing itself as the Hillary Clinton website, a person who does not believe in single payer because her Byzantine Hillarycare scheme is so much better.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)And I was pointing out that this is a failing of the exact system that we want to expand to everyone.
Just look down the page in GD.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)Cost of the F-35 program so far is $400 BILLION, with costs over the lifetime of the program estimated at $1.5 TRILLION.
That buys a lot of health care.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)That's a specious argument. But go right ahead.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Why does a person eligible for Medicare have to spend $3K per month to stay alive?
(Hint: he doesn't. But the "outrage" article about this has 50+ recs right now.)
Your OP used Dale's circumstance to suggest that single-payer is a bad idea.
Pardon if I didn't read it right.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)lamenting how the health care system in the US has failed Mr. Dale.
I'm pointing out that the health care system he is eligible for is single payer.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)...it's hard to see what you're up to other than knocking strawmen and what have you.
Have a nice day, and best of health to you.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)1)He enrolled in a Medicare Advantage program and that means he doesn't have Medicare but a private insurance or HMO that he signed all his Medicare privileges over to.
2)He has traditional Medicare and is responsible for 20% of his expenses because he didn't buy a supplemental insurance which would cost him $50 to $250 a month. Otherwise his medical expenses would be 100% covered.
If he were responsible for all his medical expenses my guess would be that, according to the information you just gave, that he would be paying $15,000 a month.
He needs to talk to a social worker who knows Medicare to get him the best medical coverage available.
Gormy Cuss
(30,884 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)gig to gig. you get paid in cash at the end of the night...on to the next gig.
that's The Gig Economy.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)disease will be covered by Medicare with Medicaid even if the patient is under 65.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But Dale is refusing standard dialysis.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)dialysis.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Dale has Medicare available to him but for a variety of reasons does not take it.
1939
(1,683 posts)When you are paid in cash or by the job, it is your responsibility at the end of the year to include yours and the employer's share of Social Security and Medicare along with your income taxes.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)it is figured into your income tax. If you don't report any income you won't get much SS. I pay a premium for Medicare.
Kermitt Gribble
(1,855 posts)This is a right wing argument against Medicare. Any time they see a flaw in a program, they want to scrap the entire program.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)who doesn't want single payer.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)The admins prefer Clinton, a majority of the active site members prefer Sanders.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)Not to be unsympathetic, but the article linked to in the diary says that Dale is doing things like refusing dialysis and he also is incurring other expenses against medical advice. It's his life and his body, so his choice, but I think there is definitely more to this story.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)As I read this he could get coverage but refuses what is offered.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)many with unique medical and social histories, with hundreds of thousands of special interests getting paid good money to deal with them and fighting to keep that money.
And legislators who are too stupid or craven to work it all out.
There are no easy answers to getting decent health care to everyone.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Hell, even Canada doesn't insure their entire population centrally, but does it by province.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)many states won't have the revenue?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's the central problem I keep coming up against. We can afford this, but we don't want to. And any talk of moving to a national single payer (which is to say, taking over the other 50% of the health care spending that the government doesn't currently cover) without talking about the taxes that will pay for it is completely pointless. Those two conversations have to happen together.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)Though now that you say that, I remember something about the Maritimes doing it all together? That might make more sense: a New England exchange, a Mid-Atlantic exchange, etc...
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)I'm saying we have to rethink our care delivery mechanism(s).
Fat chance of that, though.
Some doctors are jealous of their turfs, fighting things like midwifery. Some doctors are millionaires with specialty practices, while others are going broke. The highest-paying specialty at one point was dermatology, and general practitioners too often are those who are left over after the "good" residencies were filled. Who's going to work out how these MD's can get the best care for their patients?
The doctors' admittance criteria for hospitals might be ridiculous. I'm no expert in how a doctor is allowed to practice in a hospital, but I have seen it where a patient is admitted to a university hospital and because the doctor's and regular hospital records aren't "good enough", a complete workup had to be done, at enormous cost.
And, speaking of costs, too much has already been said about billing practices. They are horrific.
I understand that any payer, private insurance, government program, or whatever, has to guard against fraud, overbilling, and excessive treatment. But, is anyone working on standards for the costs of treatment?
Preventive medicine, education about lifestyle and other dangers... Could go on forever, and many people are...
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I think delivery is the real issue here, rather than provisioning. We could emulate Canada's system down to the last millimeter and we still couldn't afford it, because the delivery systems have gotten addicted to the money and won't give it up without some extreme alterations.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)At least for most expenses.
Single payer is 'walk into a hospital/clinic/dr office, get treated, walk out, no bill.'
While the 'Medicare for All' language is useful in pushing ideas, it's not the be all and end all.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I've been saying this for a long time and been lambasted for it. The A+B coverage is actually pretty stingy.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)full single payer. Better than nothing, but 'stingier' as you put it than full single payer.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)What's the difference?
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)And Medicare is a giant 'public option' that doesn't pay an extra 30-40% of overhead to the insurance industry.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)This is what drives me ****ing crazy! People can't even recognize this basic fact. Medicare uses private insurance companies to do its provisioning. But I'm somehow "third way" or whatever for pointing that out.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)their share of the corporate welfare. However, Medicare still manages to keep their administrative costs under 3%.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)It's a kind of dishonest figure, frankly. Anthem then provisions the actual care at their contractually-obligated burden rate (which is IIRC 12%, which is better than the ACA).
Cleita
(75,480 posts)can't refuse payment for any condition or procedure that Medicare allows and if they have squeezed a small profit out of this, I don't like it but we are stuck with it until we kick them out of the system. This is why we need a progressive President and Congress this time around. I favor Bernie but would like O'Malley as well. Those who are happy with how things are now I guess will get just that with Hillary.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)That's mostly done by Anthem in about 2/3rds of the country.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)dental and eye care. I have been dealing with Medicare since the day it went into law. First with my father who suffered from Parkinson's disease and various heart ailments, and many hospitalizations before his death. Then with my husband who suffered from end at age renal disease, which no insurance will cover except Medicare, and now with myself and many friends, who are all elderly.
I'm very familiar with what it does and it is by far the best health care coverage out there. I was always and am confident in care and coverage under Medicare. I had a very bad and costly experience with Medicare Advantage which is actually private insurance but I won't go into that here. Even with it's gaps in coverage, it's much better than any insurance or nothing, which is usually the case with insurance. You might as well not have nothing.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I hadn't really thought about eye care but now that you say that, it's a good idea too.
Orsino
(37,428 posts)We can expand not only the number of people we cover, but also the age range and the amount of expenses we cover.
Dale's story may be an indictment of Medicare as currently implemented, but not of the concept of single-payer. Anyone with doubts should consider how much worse this story could be with a class of predatory executives and shareholders able to leech even more out of us.
Medicare for all.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,328 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I studied liberal arts and then electrical engineering. Why?
Rex
(65,616 posts)in their RWing talking points. No single payer...because medicare...uh uh...
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,501 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)I've split my civilian time between working for the government and working for NGOs. And DU still finds a way to crap on that. Not really surprising, at this point.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,501 posts)on things. But, be that as it may. The small "business owner who......" bit still cracks me up. What can I say. I like the classics. I have no way of knowing what the fuck you do in your personal time, since I don't know you. I'm a Shaolin monk who travels the US in search for my father, when I'm not fighting crime and rescuing kittens. I don't expect you to appreciate what I do or how hard that is. On the other hand I can only react to what you post here. It's funny though how your concerns always skew to the right in the name of pragmatism. Remind me. What was the brilliant strategy you suggested the Democratic party follow after the 2014 ass whooping?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Or calling for $1.5 trillion dollars in reparations to African Americans?
These are "right" positions?
Interesting.
What amuses me is that I write a post about trade and it gets about 100 responses. I write another post arguing for a minimum income, and it absolutely sinks.
DU sees what it wants to see.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,501 posts)like a real asshole. Maybe you shouldn't hang out with him/her since it causes you so much anguish. I don't know what to tell you. He/she just doesn't seem to appreciate you the way you deserve.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Recursion
(56,582 posts)My views have not changed much (I've gone somewhat to the left, if anything), but I never had to deal with the baseless personal insults back then that I do now.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Thanks for amusing us with that one! Maybe if you posted your true convictions people wouldn't distrust you. Like pretending single payer and medicare are the same thing. Because this one guy refused medicare and has huge medical bills...therefore single payer and we will pretend medicare for all is bad.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Are you actually going to pretend that Medicare is not single payer?
Rex
(65,616 posts)And you seem to not know even the basics about something you pretend to be an expert on. Why is that?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)This is ridiculous.
Rex
(65,616 posts)by replies that you know nothing at all about. Yes you are being ridiculous. Thanks for admitting to it.
Guy Whitey Corngood
(26,501 posts)to the left" is advising that the party actually "move to the right" (and I'm pretty sure I ain't paraphrasing here). Then I must be in upside down/opposite world or some shit.
Response to Guy Whitey Corngood (Reply #79)
Rex This message was self-deleted by its author.
madville
(7,410 posts)Twice a day. Medicare and his insurance will only cover the once a week change recommended by his healthcare provider.
That's what happens with one-size-fits-all coverage, once a week may be fine for 99% of those covered but if he has an adverse reaction to that schedule they apparently won't make an exception for him.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)The clinic always found ways within the parameters set out by Medicare to accommodate patient's needs. However, they could only do as much as the patient would do. If a patient doesn't cooperate then there is nothing any medical care provider can do.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)My Mom is on Medicare and carries coverage to make up the 20% Medicare doesn't -- the cost for that supplemental is $256 per month. She has had more operations, serious illnesses, and hospitalizations than you could shake a stick at the past 15+ years (we're talking easily over a million in care) and she has not had to pay ONE PENNY beyond her monthly supplemental.
Now, her medicine is another issue -- Medicare part D is still faulty, with its donut hole (which my Mom gets into).
Cleita
(75,480 posts)nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)If you're self employed you still pay in.
nashville_brook
(20,958 posts)might have been product such as recordings.
calm down now. go ask him yourself.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)He thought he was gaining something by never paying FICA taxes, but now it is costing him. I forget how many quarters a person needs. I got them a long time ago, but when I was a trumpet player during the summer, FICA has no record of my income for those years. Did not pay in as a paper boy either.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)But even if he has never had any W-2 wages, it's $600/month, which is one fifth of what he's paying.
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)If you haven't, you can still buy into it at a much lower rate than private insurance. I think Mr Dale's problem is that his Medicare provider will not approve the supplies he says he needs.
Rex
(65,616 posts)And the OP knew that before posting the thread.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)My agent made me form an LLC for my recordings, which passed through a "wage" for all of my royalties, on which I paid FICA and Medicare.
Obviously in Mr. Dale's time things may have been looser, but it's certainly possible for musicians to pay into Medicare. And even if they don't, Part A goes to everybody.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)and I paid into both. You do have to report your income. I pay a small premium for medicare.
There's a post with 50+ recs right now lamenting Mr. Dale's condition and the health care system that makes it possible.
Which is... Medicare.
The system we want to expand to everyone.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Nice try. Here is a penny for the effort.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Not surprised.
Rex
(65,616 posts)The man had parts of his stomach and intestines removed, had renal failure and cancer more than once. Yet you use him for some cheap bullshit RWing talking point to pretend this is about single payer. 300 million people in this country and because of ONE you heard of (you probably have no idea who Dick Dale is) that is having problems with medicare...we need to never have single payer.
As usual your claim is garbage as is almost every OP you make to stir up shit here in GD.
There, response complete. Your concern troll garbage is just that...carry on.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)hmmm
Rex
(65,616 posts)Always the same garbage with this bunch.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)I'm glad you've joined the bandwagon.
hfojvt
(37,573 posts)since my dental work
So I am not joining any band wagons.
Just making an observation, or two.
From the start my position was that single payer was not politically feasible. Heck, we had a huge electoral backlash even from Obamacare - and still have not recovered.
The public is still electing a majority of Republicans to Congress, I highly doubt if running on single payer is gonna change that.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)I just reread that article -- nowhere does it say he is on Medicare, just that he pays for "insurance" and the cost of his supplies not covered by that insurance. Nashville_Brook pointed out that, as a musician, he probably did not pay into the Medicare system so would not qualify to participate.
If that is indeed the case, then this story would actually back up the call for Medicare for all.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)If he's not on Medicare, he had to actively opt out.
Hell Hath No Fury
(16,327 posts)you are not automatically enrolled. And you have to qualify through your work history or pay into the system:
"Anyone age 65 or over is eligible for Medicare. Most people age 65 and over are covered under Medicare Part A for free, based on their work records or on their spouse's work records.
People over 65 who are not eligible for free Medicare Part A coverage can enroll in it and pay a monthly fee for the same coverage. The premium base rate depends on the number of work credits you've earned."
http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/medicare-faq-29101-2.html
Rex
(65,616 posts)Goodluck, I bet they have a weak and inaccurate retort for everything you reply with. It is the OPs MO.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)It would cost him $500+/mo just for Parts A and B, add in the copays and it wouldn't take much to get him to that $3K/mo
TexasBushwhacker
(20,190 posts)and paid FICA taxes, then that was a really bad choice. If he was paid in cash for his gigs, that's still reportable income that's subject to FICA and income taxes.
Considering he's made enough in royalties and for performances that he owns 80 acres near Palm Springs, I don't think he was especially strapped for cash when he was younger. Perhaps he got some really bad tax advice.
It sucks being old and it sucks even more being old and sick, but I think Dick's problems with the cost of his healthcare are pretty much self inflicted.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)so if he reported it he would receive SS. He would have to report royalties of which must have been decent over time.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)before leading with this horrible story.
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)Americans, you only deserve the healthcare that's left after the CEO take their billions!
If dick lived in Canada, or any other developed country, his treatment would be covered. Your corporate propaganda would probably be better received at freeperville.