Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:05 PM Aug 2015

Dick Dale has single payer and spends $3000/month to stay alive

If anyone is curious why there is skepticism about expanding Medicare to all:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/08/03/1408454/-Legendary-guitarist-forced-to-stay-on-tour-to-pay-his-medical-expenses

Dick Dale (think the crazy surf guitar solo in "Pulp Fiction&quot is still touring at the age of 78 because he has to pay $3K / month for his medical expenses.

He's 78, so he's on Medicare.

You know, the single payer system we want to expand to everyone.

I think there's more to this story and that a national insurance system like Medicare is probably a good idea, but this is a horrible story for us to lead with.

113 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Dick Dale has single payer and spends $3000/month to stay alive (Original Post) Recursion Aug 2015 OP
We have moved forwards a bit on this.... daleanime Aug 2015 #1
We are not getting the whole story on this one yeoman6987 Aug 2015 #30
If you didn't make enough SS wages, it will cost you. Look it up. hobbit709 Aug 2015 #87
She is much younger than him TexasBushwhacker Aug 2015 #99
I saw this article, and find dofus Aug 2015 #2
He could buy a Medigap policy for a few hundred TexasBushwhacker Aug 2015 #10
I was wondering about that. dofus Aug 2015 #52
Shhhhh....don't mess up the OPs fake outrage otherwise he will have to find some other Rex Aug 2015 #58
Can he buy Medigap now, with a pre-existing condition? JustABozoOnThisBus Aug 2015 #106
Medigap policies are purchased from private insurers TexasBushwhacker Aug 2015 #110
While it definitely looks like we are moving closer and closer to a single payer system.... cbdo2007 Aug 2015 #3
Medicare isn't single payer. KG Aug 2015 #4
Yes, it is. "Single Payer" is often branded as "Medicare for All" Recursion Aug 2015 #5
If it is single payer, why do we have to buy medicare supplemental insurance. demigoddess Aug 2015 #90
There are supplemental health policies in Canada and the UK too (nt) Recursion Aug 2015 #93
What is it then? n/t 1StrongBlackMan Aug 2015 #27
Of course it is not, the OP is just stirring shit to get negative replies. Rex Aug 2015 #59
+1 Zorra Aug 2015 #82
Been doing that since they started posting on DU3. Rex Aug 2015 #89
I guess this country is just to damn poor to provide health care to its citizens. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #6
Sounds like a reason to be skeptical of single payer Recursion Aug 2015 #7
So do you work for the private health care industry that you would Cleita Aug 2015 #15
OFFS, somebody already posted this complaining about our health care system Recursion Aug 2015 #18
No, it sounds like a reason to rejigger our priorities. Comrade Grumpy Aug 2015 #16
So the only way to have single-payer is if it doesn't cover serious medical conditions?? Wilms Aug 2015 #8
Why doesn't Medicare cover his condition? Recursion Aug 2015 #76
Wut? Wilms Aug 2015 #86
There's a very popular post in GD right now quoting this same article Recursion Aug 2015 #94
Scanning this thread... Wilms Aug 2015 #113
Thoughts. Cleita Aug 2015 #9
^^^This^^^n/t Gormy Cuss Aug 2015 #19
musicians don't pay into social security and medicare nashville_brook Aug 2015 #61
They are still eligible for Medicare and certain conditions like kidney Cleita Aug 2015 #66
Renal failure at any age is covered by Medicare Recursion Aug 2015 #74
They still have to give him care. There is more to it than just Cleita Aug 2015 #77
There is. This post is a response to a much more-recommended post on the same article Recursion Aug 2015 #78
Yes, but 1939 Aug 2015 #102
As a lifelong musician it is gig to gig but redstateblues Aug 2015 #104
So we can't expand it and fix/fund it at the same time? Kermitt Gribble Aug 2015 #11
Also Daily Kos is backing Hillary Clinton for President, a woman Cleita Aug 2015 #17
DK is actually like DU there. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #22
So, keep on buying private insurance? Starry Messenger Aug 2015 #12
Yeah, that's where I'm heading too Recursion Aug 2015 #13
We have a country with over 300 million people... TreasonousBastard Aug 2015 #14
So why is centrally-controlled health care the right answer? Recursion Aug 2015 #20
Considering Vermont's failed flirtation with SP how do we overcome the fact Nuclear Unicorn Aug 2015 #35
They'll all *have* the revenue but they won't want to tax it Recursion Aug 2015 #36
That's why it has to be national or at least regional like in Canada. eom Cleita Aug 2015 #37
Canada is by-province, isn't it? Recursion Aug 2015 #56
I'm not saying it is... TreasonousBastard Aug 2015 #65
I am 100% in agreement with you there Recursion Aug 2015 #67
Medicare is not full single payer. It's '80%' of it. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #21
So we don't actually mean "Medicare for All"? Recursion Aug 2015 #23
The people who simply wanted to expand medicare were using that as a stepping stone towards Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #28
Well, hell, ACA is a stepping stone and it's crapped upon daily Recursion Aug 2015 #31
The difference is that private insurance companies are central to the ACA. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #32
Private insurance companies are central to Medicare!!! Recursion Aug 2015 #34
Yes, various Republican congresses let the fox into the henhouse for Cleita Aug 2015 #43
The 3% only counts Medicare getting the money from the Trust Fund to Anthem Recursion Aug 2015 #45
So what. Anthem has to follow strict protocol set up by Medicare. They Cleita Aug 2015 #49
What is 'provisioning' in this context? nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Aug 2015 #47
Writing the actual checks and taking the actual receipts Recursion Aug 2015 #48
The only thing I would change is make it 100% coverage and have it cover Cleita Aug 2015 #33
I'd love to see dental included in wherever we go from here Recursion Aug 2015 #51
Medicare for all. Orsino Aug 2015 #57
Are you a recent business school graduate? Hassin Bin Sober Aug 2015 #24
No Recursion Aug 2015 #26
It is sad, but the OP is always amusing Rex Aug 2015 #41
Probably a "small business owner who listens to both sides". nt Guy Whitey Corngood Aug 2015 #64
My God you guys need some new material Recursion Aug 2015 #75
I don't think DU does anything. There are individuals at DU with a number of different perspectives Guy Whitey Corngood Aug 2015 #79
So, my calling for a $25 minimum wage is "skewing right"? Recursion Aug 2015 #80
So, what exactly was your advice for the Democratic party again? Man, you make that DU guy sound Guy Whitey Corngood Aug 2015 #88
... Rex Aug 2015 #91
Yeah? Well, a decade ago he wasn't such an asshole, when I first met him Recursion Aug 2015 #92
Somewhat to the left! Wow you are so funny! Rex Aug 2015 #95
Medicare is single payer Recursion Aug 2015 #96
You are the one pretending medicare is single payer nobody else in this thread is. Rex Aug 2015 #98
OMFG do you not even know what "single payer" means? Recursion Aug 2015 #100
Again you are the only person in here pretending to know something that is apparent Rex Aug 2015 #103
As I said. He sounds terrible. It's a shame that you're forced to hang out with him. And if "moving Guy Whitey Corngood Aug 2015 #105
This message was self-deleted by its author Rex Aug 2015 #85
He is choosing to swap out his equipment madville Aug 2015 #25
My husband was on dialysis and I didn't find this at all. Cleita Aug 2015 #39
He's doing something wrong, then. Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2015 #29
That's been my experience with it too. eom Cleita Aug 2015 #38
musicians generally don't pay into social security and medicare nashville_brook Aug 2015 #60
Do you mean he didn't file a tax return for $60 years? TexasBushwhacker Aug 2015 #62
his income wasn't wages. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #63
so maybe he does NOT have medicare then hfojvt Aug 2015 #72
Part A is essentially guaranteed Recursion Aug 2015 #73
You have to pay in for 40 quarters (10 years) TexasBushwhacker Aug 2015 #81
Mr. Dale refused medicare for whatever reason that we do not know and the article does not say. Rex Aug 2015 #101
Depends Recursion Aug 2015 #71
I have made my living playing music for 30 years redstateblues Aug 2015 #108
... Rex Aug 2015 #40
Go on... Recursion Aug 2015 #42
Yes next you will tell us why we need to get rid of social security. Rex Aug 2015 #44
So, no actual response? Recursion Aug 2015 #46
Why would I expect you to be a serious poster here when you post RWing crap? Rex Aug 2015 #53
took my observation and made an OP out of it hfojvt Aug 2015 #50
Slow week...they couldn't run off Octa so now have to try something different. Rex Aug 2015 #54
I've been saying this for like 5 years now Recursion Aug 2015 #55
I cannot play trumpet any more hfojvt Aug 2015 #68
Where does it say he is on Medicare?? Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2015 #69
He's a US citizen over the age of 65 Recursion Aug 2015 #70
No, you have to sign UP for Medicare -- Hell Hath No Fury Aug 2015 #83
Funny how little the OP knows about a subject they pretend to be an expert on. Rex Aug 2015 #97
If like most musicians he never made enough to qualify for Social Security hobbit709 Aug 2015 #84
If you mean he never reported his income TexasBushwhacker Aug 2015 #107
I'm sure Dick Dale had some really good years redstateblues Aug 2015 #109
Maybe you should do more research on Dick Dale and Medicare ... GeorgeGist Aug 2015 #111
so we should stick with the profit model, cuz it's great!!! Doctor_J Aug 2015 #112
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
30. We are not getting the whole story on this one
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:54 PM
Aug 2015

Perhaps his wife is not on Medicare yet due to age. Something isn't right though.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
99. She is much younger than him
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:21 PM
Aug 2015

She may not even be 50. Even so, she should be able to get SSI or SSDI and Medicare if she is disabled by her MS.

dofus

(2,413 posts)
2. I saw this article, and find
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:12 PM
Aug 2015

his situation particularly sad. He does have a long list of health issues, so much so that I'm rather surprised he can possibly get out of bed to perform.

Medicare really is a good system for most of its enrollees. This just points out how much more needs to be done, how we should be absolutely capping anyone's costs, no matter if they're on Medicare or totally uninsured.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
10. He could buy a Medigap policy for a few hundred
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:24 PM
Aug 2015

per month.

It sounds like he's just not good with his money. He went through an expensive divorce several years ago that took all his cash, but he still owns 80 acres of land near Palm Springs.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
58. Shhhhh....don't mess up the OPs fake outrage otherwise he will have to find some other
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:29 PM
Aug 2015

RWing garbage to post in GD. Let him keep pretending medicare and single payer are the same thing.

JustABozoOnThisBus

(23,340 posts)
106. Can he buy Medigap now, with a pre-existing condition?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:35 PM
Aug 2015

Can he get Medigap from an Affordable Health Care website?

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
110. Medigap policies are purchased from private insurers
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:55 PM
Aug 2015

You have to buy them when you enroll on Medicare at age 65. After that, they may not accept your application and even if they do accept you, there may be a waiting period of 6 months to cover pre existing conditions. The best time to enroll is within 6 months of your 65th birthday.

cbdo2007

(9,213 posts)
3. While it definitely looks like we are moving closer and closer to a single payer system....
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:12 PM
Aug 2015

it isn't going to solve 90% of the complaints people here on DU have about Health Insurance/Health Care.

demigoddess

(6,641 posts)
90. If it is single payer, why do we have to buy medicare supplemental insurance.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:15 PM
Aug 2015

Medicare covers hospitalization, you have to buy insurance to cover office visits which is Part B. Medications, Part D is mostly paid for. that is what I understand, but I am an ignoramus

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
59. Of course it is not, the OP is just stirring shit to get negative replies.
Reply to KG (Reply #4)
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:31 PM
Aug 2015

Like all concern trolls do.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
89. Been doing that since they started posting on DU3.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:14 PM
Aug 2015

As if some of us long time posters didn't notice.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
6. I guess this country is just to damn poor to provide health care to its citizens.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:18 PM
Aug 2015

But look at all those shiny new F-35s!

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
7. Sounds like a reason to be skeptical of single payer
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:20 PM
Aug 2015

Seriously.

Here's a man with a medical need, and it costs him $3000/month to stay alive.

He's on Medicare, the single-payer system we want to expand to everyone.

How do we convince people they won't face this problem?

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
15. So do you work for the private health care industry that you would
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:33 PM
Aug 2015

publish this hit piece and immediately go to trashing single payer? I don't know why this guy pays that unless he's too dumb to pay for a medigap policy. The facts that aren't mentioned in this article are pretty telling. Also, it seems to come from a website that is announcing itself as the Hillary Clinton website, a person who does not believe in single payer because her Byzantine Hillarycare scheme is so much better.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
18. OFFS, somebody already posted this complaining about our health care system
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:34 PM
Aug 2015

And I was pointing out that this is a failing of the exact system that we want to expand to everyone.

Just look down the page in GD.

 

Comrade Grumpy

(13,184 posts)
16. No, it sounds like a reason to rejigger our priorities.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:34 PM
Aug 2015
http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/16/politics/f-35-jsf-operational-costs/

Cost of the F-35 program so far is $400 BILLION, with costs over the lifetime of the program estimated at $1.5 TRILLION.

That buys a lot of health care.
 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
8. So the only way to have single-payer is if it doesn't cover serious medical conditions??
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:23 PM
Aug 2015

That's a specious argument. But go right ahead.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
76. Why doesn't Medicare cover his condition?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:01 PM
Aug 2015

Why does a person eligible for Medicare have to spend $3K per month to stay alive?

(Hint: he doesn't. But the "outrage" article about this has 50+ recs right now.)

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
86. Wut?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:13 PM
Aug 2015

Your OP used Dale's circumstance to suggest that single-payer is a bad idea.

Pardon if I didn't read it right.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
94. There's a very popular post in GD right now quoting this same article
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:18 PM
Aug 2015

lamenting how the health care system in the US has failed Mr. Dale.

I'm pointing out that the health care system he is eligible for is single payer.

 

Wilms

(26,795 posts)
113. Scanning this thread...
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 05:42 PM
Aug 2015

...it's hard to see what you're up to other than knocking strawmen and what have you.

Have a nice day, and best of health to you.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
9. Thoughts.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:23 PM
Aug 2015

1)He enrolled in a Medicare Advantage program and that means he doesn't have Medicare but a private insurance or HMO that he signed all his Medicare privileges over to.

2)He has traditional Medicare and is responsible for 20% of his expenses because he didn't buy a supplemental insurance which would cost him $50 to $250 a month. Otherwise his medical expenses would be 100% covered.

If he were responsible for all his medical expenses my guess would be that, according to the information you just gave, that he would be paying $15,000 a month.

He needs to talk to a social worker who knows Medicare to get him the best medical coverage available.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
61. musicians don't pay into social security and medicare
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:35 PM
Aug 2015

gig to gig. you get paid in cash at the end of the night...on to the next gig.

that's The Gig Economy.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
66. They are still eligible for Medicare and certain conditions like kidney
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:42 PM
Aug 2015

disease will be covered by Medicare with Medicaid even if the patient is under 65.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
78. There is. This post is a response to a much more-recommended post on the same article
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:04 PM
Aug 2015

Dale has Medicare available to him but for a variety of reasons does not take it.

1939

(1,683 posts)
102. Yes, but
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:23 PM
Aug 2015

When you are paid in cash or by the job, it is your responsibility at the end of the year to include yours and the employer's share of Social Security and Medicare along with your income taxes.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
104. As a lifelong musician it is gig to gig but
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:27 PM
Aug 2015

it is figured into your income tax. If you don't report any income you won't get much SS. I pay a premium for Medicare.

Kermitt Gribble

(1,855 posts)
11. So we can't expand it and fix/fund it at the same time?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:24 PM
Aug 2015

This is a right wing argument against Medicare. Any time they see a flaw in a program, they want to scrap the entire program.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
22. DK is actually like DU there.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:42 PM
Aug 2015

The admins prefer Clinton, a majority of the active site members prefer Sanders.

Starry Messenger

(32,342 posts)
12. So, keep on buying private insurance?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:24 PM
Aug 2015

Not to be unsympathetic, but the article linked to in the diary says that Dale is doing things like refusing dialysis and he also is incurring other expenses against medical advice. It's his life and his body, so his choice, but I think there is definitely more to this story.

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
14. We have a country with over 300 million people...
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:28 PM
Aug 2015

many with unique medical and social histories, with hundreds of thousands of special interests getting paid good money to deal with them and fighting to keep that money.

And legislators who are too stupid or craven to work it all out.

There are no easy answers to getting decent health care to everyone.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
20. So why is centrally-controlled health care the right answer?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:38 PM
Aug 2015

Hell, even Canada doesn't insure their entire population centrally, but does it by province.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
35. Considering Vermont's failed flirtation with SP how do we overcome the fact
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:01 PM
Aug 2015

many states won't have the revenue?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
36. They'll all *have* the revenue but they won't want to tax it
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:02 PM
Aug 2015

That's the central problem I keep coming up against. We can afford this, but we don't want to. And any talk of moving to a national single payer (which is to say, taking over the other 50% of the health care spending that the government doesn't currently cover) without talking about the taxes that will pay for it is completely pointless. Those two conversations have to happen together.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
56. Canada is by-province, isn't it?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:27 PM
Aug 2015

Though now that you say that, I remember something about the Maritimes doing it all together? That might make more sense: a New England exchange, a Mid-Atlantic exchange, etc...

TreasonousBastard

(43,049 posts)
65. I'm not saying it is...
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:42 PM
Aug 2015

I'm saying we have to rethink our care delivery mechanism(s).

Fat chance of that, though.

Some doctors are jealous of their turfs, fighting things like midwifery. Some doctors are millionaires with specialty practices, while others are going broke. The highest-paying specialty at one point was dermatology, and general practitioners too often are those who are left over after the "good" residencies were filled. Who's going to work out how these MD's can get the best care for their patients?

The doctors' admittance criteria for hospitals might be ridiculous. I'm no expert in how a doctor is allowed to practice in a hospital, but I have seen it where a patient is admitted to a university hospital and because the doctor's and regular hospital records aren't "good enough", a complete workup had to be done, at enormous cost.

And, speaking of costs, too much has already been said about billing practices. They are horrific.

I understand that any payer, private insurance, government program, or whatever, has to guard against fraud, overbilling, and excessive treatment. But, is anyone working on standards for the costs of treatment?

Preventive medicine, education about lifestyle and other dangers... Could go on forever, and many people are...

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
67. I am 100% in agreement with you there
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:44 PM
Aug 2015

I think delivery is the real issue here, rather than provisioning. We could emulate Canada's system down to the last millimeter and we still couldn't afford it, because the delivery systems have gotten addicted to the money and won't give it up without some extreme alterations.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
21. Medicare is not full single payer. It's '80%' of it.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:41 PM
Aug 2015

At least for most expenses.

Single payer is 'walk into a hospital/clinic/dr office, get treated, walk out, no bill.'

While the 'Medicare for All' language is useful in pushing ideas, it's not the be all and end all.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
23. So we don't actually mean "Medicare for All"?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:45 PM
Aug 2015

I've been saying this for a long time and been lambasted for it. The A+B coverage is actually pretty stingy.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
28. The people who simply wanted to expand medicare were using that as a stepping stone towards
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:53 PM
Aug 2015

full single payer. Better than nothing, but 'stingier' as you put it than full single payer.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
32. The difference is that private insurance companies are central to the ACA.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:58 PM
Aug 2015

And Medicare is a giant 'public option' that doesn't pay an extra 30-40% of overhead to the insurance industry.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
34. Private insurance companies are central to Medicare!!!
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:01 PM
Aug 2015

This is what drives me ****ing crazy! People can't even recognize this basic fact. Medicare uses private insurance companies to do its provisioning. But I'm somehow "third way" or whatever for pointing that out.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
43. Yes, various Republican congresses let the fox into the henhouse for
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

their share of the corporate welfare. However, Medicare still manages to keep their administrative costs under 3%.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
45. The 3% only counts Medicare getting the money from the Trust Fund to Anthem
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:13 PM
Aug 2015

It's a kind of dishonest figure, frankly. Anthem then provisions the actual care at their contractually-obligated burden rate (which is IIRC 12%, which is better than the ACA).

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
49. So what. Anthem has to follow strict protocol set up by Medicare. They
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:22 PM
Aug 2015

can't refuse payment for any condition or procedure that Medicare allows and if they have squeezed a small profit out of this, I don't like it but we are stuck with it until we kick them out of the system. This is why we need a progressive President and Congress this time around. I favor Bernie but would like O'Malley as well. Those who are happy with how things are now I guess will get just that with Hillary.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
48. Writing the actual checks and taking the actual receipts
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:20 PM
Aug 2015

That's mostly done by Anthem in about 2/3rds of the country.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
33. The only thing I would change is make it 100% coverage and have it cover
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:59 PM
Aug 2015

dental and eye care. I have been dealing with Medicare since the day it went into law. First with my father who suffered from Parkinson's disease and various heart ailments, and many hospitalizations before his death. Then with my husband who suffered from end at age renal disease, which no insurance will cover except Medicare, and now with myself and many friends, who are all elderly.

I'm very familiar with what it does and it is by far the best health care coverage out there. I was always and am confident in care and coverage under Medicare. I had a very bad and costly experience with Medicare Advantage which is actually private insurance but I won't go into that here. Even with it's gaps in coverage, it's much better than any insurance or nothing, which is usually the case with insurance. You might as well not have nothing.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
51. I'd love to see dental included in wherever we go from here
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:24 PM
Aug 2015

I hadn't really thought about eye care but now that you say that, it's a good idea too.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
57. Medicare for all.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:28 PM
Aug 2015

We can expand not only the number of people we cover, but also the age range and the amount of expenses we cover.

Dale's story may be an indictment of Medicare as currently implemented, but not of the concept of single-payer. Anyone with doubts should consider how much worse this story could be with a class of predatory executives and shareholders able to leech even more out of us.

Medicare for all.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
41. It is sad, but the OP is always amusing
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:10 PM
Aug 2015

in their RWing talking points. No single payer...because medicare...uh uh...

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
75. My God you guys need some new material
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:00 PM
Aug 2015

I've split my civilian time between working for the government and working for NGOs. And DU still finds a way to crap on that. Not really surprising, at this point.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts)
79. I don't think DU does anything. There are individuals at DU with a number of different perspectives
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:08 PM
Aug 2015

on things. But, be that as it may. The small "business owner who......" bit still cracks me up. What can I say. I like the classics. I have no way of knowing what the fuck you do in your personal time, since I don't know you. I'm a Shaolin monk who travels the US in search for my father, when I'm not fighting crime and rescuing kittens. I don't expect you to appreciate what I do or how hard that is. On the other hand I can only react to what you post here. It's funny though how your concerns always skew to the right in the name of pragmatism. Remind me. What was the brilliant strategy you suggested the Democratic party follow after the 2014 ass whooping?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
80. So, my calling for a $25 minimum wage is "skewing right"?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:09 PM
Aug 2015

Or calling for $1.5 trillion dollars in reparations to African Americans?

These are "right" positions?

Interesting.

What amuses me is that I write a post about trade and it gets about 100 responses. I write another post arguing for a minimum income, and it absolutely sinks.

DU sees what it wants to see.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts)
88. So, what exactly was your advice for the Democratic party again? Man, you make that DU guy sound
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:14 PM
Aug 2015

like a real asshole. Maybe you shouldn't hang out with him/her since it causes you so much anguish. I don't know what to tell you. He/she just doesn't seem to appreciate you the way you deserve.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
92. Yeah? Well, a decade ago he wasn't such an asshole, when I first met him
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:16 PM
Aug 2015

My views have not changed much (I've gone somewhat to the left, if anything), but I never had to deal with the baseless personal insults back then that I do now.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
95. Somewhat to the left! Wow you are so funny!
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:19 PM
Aug 2015

Thanks for amusing us with that one! Maybe if you posted your true convictions people wouldn't distrust you. Like pretending single payer and medicare are the same thing. Because this one guy refused medicare and has huge medical bills...therefore single payer and we will pretend medicare for all is bad.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
98. You are the one pretending medicare is single payer nobody else in this thread is.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:21 PM
Aug 2015

And you seem to not know even the basics about something you pretend to be an expert on. Why is that?

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
103. Again you are the only person in here pretending to know something that is apparent
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:24 PM
Aug 2015

by replies that you know nothing at all about. Yes you are being ridiculous. Thanks for admitting to it.

Guy Whitey Corngood

(26,501 posts)
105. As I said. He sounds terrible. It's a shame that you're forced to hang out with him. And if "moving
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:31 PM
Aug 2015

to the left" is advising that the party actually "move to the right" (and I'm pretty sure I ain't paraphrasing here). Then I must be in upside down/opposite world or some shit.

Response to Guy Whitey Corngood (Reply #79)

madville

(7,410 posts)
25. He is choosing to swap out his equipment
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:49 PM
Aug 2015

Twice a day. Medicare and his insurance will only cover the once a week change recommended by his healthcare provider.

That's what happens with one-size-fits-all coverage, once a week may be fine for 99% of those covered but if he has an adverse reaction to that schedule they apparently won't make an exception for him.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
39. My husband was on dialysis and I didn't find this at all.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:08 PM
Aug 2015

The clinic always found ways within the parameters set out by Medicare to accommodate patient's needs. However, they could only do as much as the patient would do. If a patient doesn't cooperate then there is nothing any medical care provider can do.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
29. He's doing something wrong, then.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:54 PM
Aug 2015

My Mom is on Medicare and carries coverage to make up the 20% Medicare doesn't -- the cost for that supplemental is $256 per month. She has had more operations, serious illnesses, and hospitalizations than you could shake a stick at the past 15+ years (we're talking easily over a million in care) and she has not had to pay ONE PENNY beyond her monthly supplemental.

Now, her medicine is another issue -- Medicare part D is still faulty, with its donut hole (which my Mom gets into).

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
72. so maybe he does NOT have medicare then
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:54 PM
Aug 2015

He thought he was gaining something by never paying FICA taxes, but now it is costing him. I forget how many quarters a person needs. I got them a long time ago, but when I was a trumpet player during the summer, FICA has no record of my income for those years. Did not pay in as a paper boy either.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
73. Part A is essentially guaranteed
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:58 PM
Aug 2015

But even if he has never had any W-2 wages, it's $600/month, which is one fifth of what he's paying.

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
81. You have to pay in for 40 quarters (10 years)
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:10 PM
Aug 2015

If you haven't, you can still buy into it at a much lower rate than private insurance. I think Mr Dale's problem is that his Medicare provider will not approve the supplies he says he needs.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
101. Mr. Dale refused medicare for whatever reason that we do not know and the article does not say.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:23 PM
Aug 2015

And the OP knew that before posting the thread.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
71. Depends
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:51 PM
Aug 2015

My agent made me form an LLC for my recordings, which passed through a "wage" for all of my royalties, on which I paid FICA and Medicare.

Obviously in Mr. Dale's time things may have been looser, but it's certainly possible for musicians to pay into Medicare. And even if they don't, Part A goes to everybody.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
108. I have made my living playing music for 30 years
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:50 PM
Aug 2015

and I paid into both. You do have to report your income. I pay a small premium for medicare.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
42. Go on...
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

There's a post with 50+ recs right now lamenting Mr. Dale's condition and the health care system that makes it possible.

Which is... Medicare.

The system we want to expand to everyone.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
44. Yes next you will tell us why we need to get rid of social security.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

Nice try. Here is a penny for the effort.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
53. Why would I expect you to be a serious poster here when you post RWing crap?
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:25 PM
Aug 2015

The man had parts of his stomach and intestines removed, had renal failure and cancer more than once. Yet you use him for some cheap bullshit RWing talking point to pretend this is about single payer. 300 million people in this country and because of ONE you heard of (you probably have no idea who Dick Dale is) that is having problems with medicare...we need to never have single payer.

As usual your claim is garbage as is almost every OP you make to stir up shit here in GD.

There, response complete. Your concern troll garbage is just that...carry on.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
54. Slow week...they couldn't run off Octa so now have to try something different.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:26 PM
Aug 2015

Always the same garbage with this bunch.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
68. I cannot play trumpet any more
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:44 PM
Aug 2015

since my dental work

So I am not joining any band wagons.

Just making an observation, or two.

From the start my position was that single payer was not politically feasible. Heck, we had a huge electoral backlash even from Obamacare - and still have not recovered.

The public is still electing a majority of Republicans to Congress, I highly doubt if running on single payer is gonna change that.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
69. Where does it say he is on Medicare??
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 02:48 PM
Aug 2015

I just reread that article -- nowhere does it say he is on Medicare, just that he pays for "insurance" and the cost of his supplies not covered by that insurance. Nashville_Brook pointed out that, as a musician, he probably did not pay into the Medicare system so would not qualify to participate.

If that is indeed the case, then this story would actually back up the call for Medicare for all.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
83. No, you have to sign UP for Medicare --
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:12 PM
Aug 2015

you are not automatically enrolled. And you have to qualify through your work history or pay into the system:

"Anyone age 65 or over is eligible for Medicare. Most people age 65 and over are covered under Medicare Part A for free, based on their work records or on their spouse's work records.

People over 65 who are not eligible for free Medicare Part A coverage can enroll in it and pay a monthly fee for the same coverage. The premium base rate depends on the number of work credits you've earned."

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/medicare-faq-29101-2.html

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
97. Funny how little the OP knows about a subject they pretend to be an expert on.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:20 PM
Aug 2015

Goodluck, I bet they have a weak and inaccurate retort for everything you reply with. It is the OPs MO.

hobbit709

(41,694 posts)
84. If like most musicians he never made enough to qualify for Social Security
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:12 PM
Aug 2015

It would cost him $500+/mo just for Parts A and B, add in the copays and it wouldn't take much to get him to that $3K/mo

TexasBushwhacker

(20,190 posts)
107. If you mean he never reported his income
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:42 PM
Aug 2015

and paid FICA taxes, then that was a really bad choice. If he was paid in cash for his gigs, that's still reportable income that's subject to FICA and income taxes.

Considering he's made enough in royalties and for performances that he owns 80 acres near Palm Springs, I don't think he was especially strapped for cash when he was younger. Perhaps he got some really bad tax advice.

It sucks being old and it sucks even more being old and sick, but I think Dick's problems with the cost of his healthcare are pretty much self inflicted.

redstateblues

(10,565 posts)
109. I'm sure Dick Dale had some really good years
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:54 PM
Aug 2015

so if he reported it he would receive SS. He would have to report royalties of which must have been decent over time.

GeorgeGist

(25,321 posts)
111. Maybe you should do more research on Dick Dale and Medicare ...
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:56 PM
Aug 2015

before leading with this horrible story.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
112. so we should stick with the profit model, cuz it's great!!!
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 03:59 PM
Aug 2015

Americans, you only deserve the healthcare that's left after the CEO take their billions!

If dick lived in Canada, or any other developed country, his treatment would be covered. Your corporate propaganda would probably be better received at freeperville.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Dick Dale has single paye...