General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Prosecution of White Collar Crime Hits 20-Year Low: Report
http://www.ibtimes.com/us-prosecution-white-collar-crime-hits-20-year-low-report-2037160U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder (right) chats with Lanny Breuer, assistant attorney general in the criminal division of the Justice Department, before their testimony on the second day of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, Jan. 14, 2010. Reuters
In the aftermath of the 2008 financial crisis, prosecutions ticked up slightly, but then dropped. Landing amid calls from Democratic presidential candidates for more Wall Street prosecutions, the report notes that the projected number of prosecutions this year is 12 percent less than last year and 29 percent less than five years ago.
The decline in federal white-collar crime prosecutions does not necessarily indicate there has been a decline in white-collar crime, Syracuse researchers note. Rather, it may reflect shifting enforcement policies by each of the administrations and the various agencies.
Underscoring that assertion is a recent study by researchers at George Mason University tracking the increased use of special Justice Department agreements that allow corporations -- and often their executives -- to avoid being prosecuted. Before 2003, researchers found, the Justice Department offered almost no such deals. The researchers report that from 2007 to 2011, 44 percent of cases were resolved through the deals -- known as deferred prosecution agreements and non-prosecution agreements.
In 2012, President Obama pledged to hold Wall Street accountable for financial misdeeds related to the financial crisis. But as financial industry donations flooded into Obamas reelection campaign, his Justice Department officials promoted policies that critics say embodied a too big to jail doctrine for financial crime.
..more..
Maybe this is why ...
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Neil Barofsky, then-IG for TARP, explained how things really work...
Neil Barofsky Gave Us The Best Explanation For Washington's Dysfunction We've Ever Heard
Linette Lopez
Business Insider, Aug. 1, 2012, 2:57 PM
Neil Barofsky was the Inspector General for TARP, and just wrote a book about his time in D.C. called Bailout: An Insider Account of How Washington Abandoned Main Street While Rescuing Wall Street.
SNIP...
Bottom line: Barofsky said the incentive structure in our nation's capitol is all wrong. There's a revolving door between bureaucrats in Washington and Wall Street banks, and politicians just want to keep their jobs.
For regulators it's something like this:
[font color="green"]"You can play ball and good things can happen to you get a big pot of gold at the end of the Wall Street rainbow or you can do your job be aggressive and face personal ruin...We really need to rethink how we govern and how regulate," Barofsky said.[/font color]
CONTINUED... http://www.businessinsider.com/neil-barofsky-2012-8
...For those with integrity, along for the rest of us, it's Austerity Time.
G_j
(40,367 posts)says it all!
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Romulox
(25,960 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)he was specifically appointed by Obama to do.
In terms of purely transparent fraudulence and corruption he ranks with Ed Meese and Nixon's collection of jailbird AGs.
What a fucking pathetic, crooked specimen. A DISGRACEFUL appointment, as in worthy of the Chimp.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)yes, you hate Holder, but that doesn't make him a criminal. You wish he had performed more public show trials for Wall Street execs that would have resulted in acquittals, but that doesn't make him a criminal.
It's downright delusional to compare him to people who actually broke the law.
Throwing out factually false allegations of corruption is another example of the degradation of the political discourse in this country, that we see not only on the far right but also on the far left, to the point that when they're talking about Eric Holder, it's hard to tell the difference given that the hypershrill hyperbole is identical.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And I will leave it at that in the interest of not getting a hide or a PPR.
Shoo, and take your apologist BS with you.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)to have your posts responded to once every week or so.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Like a small pebble in my shoe.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)and are able to stick to logical, coherent discussions of issues rather than descending into puerile, sophomoric rants.
KG
(28,751 posts)Zorra
(27,670 posts)who will continue to allow white collar financial terrorists to stomp all over us, make our lives harder, and wreck our economy at will with impunity.
Oh, yeah, but even though they want to continue to privatize everything, they're still better than republicans.
I've heard that one definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The denial is deeper than the Marianas trench.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)but doing so without creating evidence that will support "beyond a reasonable doubt" in a court room.
They have a lot of lawyers, and intermediaries, whose only job it is to protect them from the consequences of their decisions. They are coached to interject phrases and caveats in their internal correspondence that show them being oh so scrupulous in trying to do the right thing, while at the same time committing the crime in offline conversations, or by dispersing responsibility in the corporate structure such that no one person has official responsibility for the criminal acts.
Sure, that could lead to a prosecution of the company, but what do they care? The company ain't going to jail.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2010/12/13/the-difficulty-of-proving-financial-crimes/
G_j
(40,367 posts)more than ever in the past.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)policy of reaching settlements without any admission of wrongdoing.
When we're talking about relatively simple crimes like embezzlement, it's pretty easy to nail them if they leave a paper trail. But when it's stuff like high level accounting judgments and valuation of complex financial instruments, proving specific intent to defraud, beyond a reasonable doubt, is a very tall order. It's no picnic in civil actions either, which is why civil lawyers try to avoid relying on allegations of fraud if they have a choice.
Right or wrong, the legal presumption of evidence applies to Wall Street scumbags, and they take full advantage of that.
G_j
(40,367 posts)and especially since they help write the laws to begin with.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)big banks rigging the game to help big banks as a class, often it's big banks trying to rig the game against their competitors (Citigroup hates seeing Goldman appointees almost as much as we do).
Amishman
(5,557 posts)sorry, I can't read the words 'White Collar' without thinking of that show.