Rachel has spent almost half her show talking about republicans

[bigdarryl]

MSNBC is really horrible

[madamesilverspurs]

1. Yeah, but

she covers republicans exactly opposite from the way Fox PROMOTES them. Big difference, and an important one.

[Cleita]

2. I turned her off. I'm recording the show and I will zap through it

later to see if there is anything worthwhile there. I think I will do that the rest of the week. If I find there is only a small amount of time spent on issues I care about, I will stop watching altogether. Screw this. I don't care about what the Republicans are doing.

[Rosco T.]

14. Then you are one of those that will never see it coming......

... know your enemy as you know yourself.

[Cleita]

15. No I will see it coming because the propaganda is everywhere you go.

What I won't see is what I need to know because it's being suppressed by a media that doesn't deserve the name. I get all the real news anyway on BBC News and Al Jazeera. I liked Ed, Chris and Rachel for their analysis and guests. Instead now we are getting Repug politicians and Heritage Foundation flacks. I don't need to watch them.

[Skidmore]

3. I appreciate the detailed analysis she gives.

Rachel is the main reason I watch MSNBC now. Rachel and Chris Hayes.

[GP6971]

4. I still like

Lawerence 2 or 3 times a week.

[pinboy3niner]

5. Her bit on The Simpsons poking fun at herself was a hoot!

http://www.buzzfeed.com/dorsey/watch-rachel-maddows-simpsons-cameo#.skb2GORWn

[Retrograde]

6. Political campaigns spend the big bucks on ads

MSNBC wants to make sure come 2016 some of those bucks come their way

[bigwillq]

7. Turn that crap off (nt)

[99th_Monkey]

8. I was annoyed by that too. Maybe she likes her job

and saw what happened to Ed

[Adrahil]

16. She wasn't exactly complimenting them.... ny

[99th_Monkey]

19. No, not exactly. I like Rachael and I like her style, But tonight on the GOP was over-the-top

Hint: I KNOW I am -- gratefully -- not voting in the Republican Primary, and so I
don't have a dog in that hunt, and could care less about the latest antics in the GOP
clown show. It makes my head hurt to see it getting saturation air-time, even when
Rachael covers it, though her humorous touches do help it go down a little better.

[UTUSN]

9. Uh, I don't think she had anything *positive* to say so what's the problem?! n/t

[pnwmom]

11. Yup. Our ignoring them, as tempting as that is, won't stop them from being a serious threat

in 2016, no matter who the parties decide to run.

[Rosco T.]

17. It makes them a bigger threat.

If the only ones that pay attention to them are the blind sheelple and fawing sycophants, then we deserve what happens.

[City Lights]

10. Is she fawning over them, talking them up, saying how great they are?

I didn't watch, but would be shocked to learn she had anything positive to say about them.

[Rosco T.]

13. Saying what doofuses they are....

.. you know like a progressive would say. How the major polling operations are telling Faux News to shove off....

Geeze.. it's.. news!

[elias49]

12. I think the point is...

[Agschmid]

18. I doubt she is talking about them positively...

Not sure your outrage makes sense here.

[uhnope]

20. is this a joke? Maddow analyzing the GOP candidates from a progressive perspective

is horrible? WTF? You do realize one of the guys could end up as POTUS, don't you?