Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,094 posts)
Fri May 18, 2012, 12:55 PM May 2012

Facebook IPO Meh


SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) — Facebook Inc. was greeted with mixed sentiment Friday morning when its shares began trading following an initial public offering that failed to land a strong first-day ‘pop’ seen by many of its Internet peers.

Facebook shares opened trading on the Nasdaq with an initial gain of more than 10%, putting the stock above the $42 mark. The shares then slipped back quickly to its $38 IPO price before bouncing back.

The stock was last trading at $40.71 — up more than 7% from its IPO price.

“I think it’s surprising that they didn’t get the pop that many were expecting,” said Arvind Bhatia of Sterne Agee. “It seems the underwriters did not leave much upside, or perhaps investors were signaling that they would buy a lot more shares than they ended up actually buying.” ...................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebook-starts-at-40-in-debut-then-fizzles-2012-05-18



6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Facebook IPO Meh (Original Post) marmar May 2012 OP
Wouldn't touch FB with a ten foot pole. It's its own bubble economy, imo. nt Romulox May 2012 #1
What did the MySpace IPO sell for? FSogol May 2012 #6
Maybe because they're selling "air". RagAss May 2012 #2
Wasn't it GM that withdrew its advertising just before the IPO? aquart May 2012 #3
It's not surprising at all. TheWraith May 2012 #4
Hard to say Johonny May 2012 #5

aquart

(69,014 posts)
3. Wasn't it GM that withdrew its advertising just before the IPO?
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:06 PM
May 2012

Not like that was blatant market manipulation or anything.

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
4. It's not surprising at all.
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:10 PM
May 2012

Facebook has annual revenue around $3.5 billion. Revenue, mind you, NOT profit. And no real long-term plan other than desktop advertising. Contrast that to Google, which has revenue around $30 billion, profit around $10 billion, and is one of the major technology drivers on the planet. And yet Google is considered by the market to be worth only twice what Facebook is. Facebook is being grossly overvalued here simply because it's popular and has a lot of users. But it's fundamentally not a very profitable business model.

Johonny

(20,895 posts)
5. Hard to say
Fri May 18, 2012, 01:20 PM
May 2012

A terrible roll out in a down market. Might not mean much long term. Right now they're competing for investors that are seeing high dividend stocks at rather attractive prices. Do you want facebook and the promise of maybe a huge return in 20 years or several DOW stocks at a cheaper price that give you 3-5 % at a low tax rate? I think if you are buying stock ATM you're more likely buying a little for the * of it FB, but mostly buying the dip on dividend yielding stocks. Probably need to wait until the Euro-paniced market settles to see what investors really think about Facebook.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Facebook IPO Meh