General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter Pluto, Where are Spacecraft Going Next?
[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
http://news.discovery.com/space/after-pluto-where-are-spacecraft-going-next-150716.htm
Way cool.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)chapdrum
(930 posts)so that the money can be better spent on... people not Pluto.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)That's about how much it cost per US resident to send the New Horizons probe to Pluto. Since that is over roughly fifteen years then it comes to about fifteen cents a year.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Horizons
On the other hand the Iraq war cost about $428.00 for every man woman and child on the planet.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026228954
kentauros
(29,414 posts)Europe.
You want to spend more money on people? Cut the military budget. Hell, you'd even have money left over to fund NASA several times over.
Oh, and NASA funds more than just space projects. Such as aeronautics research (the first 'A' in their acronym-name.)
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)Last edited Fri Jul 17, 2015, 01:04 AM - Edit history (1)
Instead, a lot of smart people had jobs for at least some amount of time designing, building, launching, and controlling the spacecraft. And those people paid taxes. And mankind's knowledge base was increased.
Science hatred: It's not just for RW fundies anymore.
edbermac
(15,947 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)and no fraudulent Spinoff magazine can change it
of course it's worthy on its own and NASA's hardly the biggest segment of the MIC
Renew Deal
(81,878 posts)Pluto and space exploration is completely about people. It's about understanding what makes the universe work and eventually making us a multi-planetary species.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Yes, there's absolutely no inherent value in learning about the Universe we inhabit... or benefit to people, for that matter.
Logical
(22,457 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)on the way to the Oort cloud.
(Astronomy nerd here)
tavernier
(12,407 posts)I was hoping someone would actually answer the question.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)as a secondary destination - one or the other, of course, they can't do both. But AFAIUI the trajectory could be tweaked to reach either.
http://news.discovery.com/space/after-pluto-where-will-nasas-new-horizons-go-150320.htm
The newly named objects are 2014 MT69, a 37-mile (60-km) wide body circling some 44.3 times farther away from the sun than Earth. An encounter with MT69 would occur around New Years Day 2019.
Its not a terribly bright target and its not very big and its quite possibly smaller, if its a binary or if other things are going on, said astronomer and New Horizons team member Simon Porter, with the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colo.
The advantage of MT69 is that New Horizons can reach it using less fuel. The encounter also would occur three months sooner than a flyby of the other candidate, known as 2014 MT70.
MT70 is brighter than MT60, and possibly larger, with a diameter of about 47 miles (76 km), so more desirable from a scientific perspective, Porter said.
We can only go to one of these, so we have to make the decision. MT69 is the front-runner because its lower Delta-v (change in velocity). Engineers love that. On the other hand, they kind of hate that its dimmer because on approach we might end up using more fuel for final (course) corrections, he said.
So conceivably there could be additional chapters to that plucky little craft's story. Not as spectacular as pluto, of course, but still interesting.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)I blanked on the name of the Kuiper belt for some reason. I hope neither of those very big rocks ever gets too close to the Earth. The universe is a fascinating place, to be sure.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)Archae
(46,354 posts)HUGE amounts of raw materials out there.
geomon666
(7,512 posts)This one isn't so welcoming any more to them.