General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBoston Marathon Bomber Files Motion Seeking New Trial
National Memo
Boston Marathon Bomber Files Motion Seeking New Trial
The preliminary motion for a new trial cited a lack of evidence in his trial this spring, according to documents filed in federal court in Massachusetts.
Read More
http://link.nationalmemo.com/5390d3d3dd52b8141a0aafe52stla.r5p/VZu64EmOvx_JvXs8A9f2d
tymorial
(3,433 posts)I find the death penalty to be abhorrent and as such did not support the sentence. This motion though... lack of evidence? Really?
Warpy
(111,267 posts)and did so repeatedly, sometimes proudly until his brother's influence finally started to wear off.
I hate the DP, too, and think it was misapplied in this case by people who wanted to hit back. It's not going to work out that way.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I covered this trial some for an online magazine.
If he confessed - and we don't know for sure because it was a part of the FBI's 302, which are rife with errors - it wasn't presented in the trial. He had not been Mirandized in the hospital, so the defense fought it to the point that the prosecution did not use it in the trial. In any case, the jury did not hear he had confessed and could not judge him based on that.
There was never any word that he ever confessed "proudly," however.
His allocution - which won't be allowed in a new trial - he said he did it, but that was well after the sentence had been voted on, so it's a moot point.
That said, I found that whole trial RIFE with judicial errors. It was rushed to trial, it wasn't moved out of an obviously biased town, the entire jury was white, the defense didn't get some of the evidence it sought and, frankly, the judge was so obviously biased toward the prosecution that everyone in the courtroom conceded it.
I'm not arguing his guilt here (and I'm NOT bashing victims - people can discuss law without meaning to cause further harm to people who are already victimized - it's not a zero-sum game). I'm simply saying that the trial was another overreach in our "war on terror."
If we're to try terrorists in our judicial system - and I agree we should rather than go to war - then we need to do a more fair job at trial. If this trial were held in the South and the defendant was a black man, you'd probably be hearing more from legal scholars about how awful this trial was from a legal standpoint, but since it was Boston and the defendant is Muslim, you hear a rare peep.
As a result of a multitude of judicial errors, this defendant probably will get a new trial and these people will have to go through all this again. They should have done it correctly the first time instead of rushing into it and never offering him a plea for LWOP (which his attorneys say he would have taken).
I'll leave you with this, though: http://cognoscenti.wbur.org/2015/04/03/murder-is-a-state-matter-harvey-silverglate-samantha-miller
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)From his sentencing statement:
Boston (CNN)Boston Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev ended his long silence on Wednesday, apologizing for the pain and suffering he caused his victims before a judge formally imposed his death sentence.
"If there is any lingering doubt, let there be no more. I did it, along with my brother," Tsarnaev said, referring to the bombings carried out by him and older brother Tamerlan. "I ask Allah to have mercy on me, my brother and my family."
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)It just isn't worth it, some days.......
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)But, that's legal shit.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)And although I am not a lawyer, from the research I did, that statement would be admissible in any re-trial.
The dude did it. There is no doubt he did it. He even says he did it. The rest is just lawyers padding fees AFAIC.
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)It was in the interest of the bereaved to conduct this trial carefully. If that wasn't the case, then justice has not prevailed.
The test of any justice system is how fairly it treats its most heinous criminals. The USA system is teetering in the brink of failure, as evidenced by this motion.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I get hell any time I post the facts that I observed.
This case has a lot of secrecy which may or may not mean a damn thing, but it should not have been held in this manner.
The judicial system is broken for anyone not white (and I'm white). I just want fairness.
Really, I appreciate it.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)So was the defendant.
Aristus
(66,380 posts)n/t
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I'm Catholic and married to a Jewish Bostonian.
Muslim is the new black.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)White people can be muslim unless you were making fun of the original OP. Perhaps I didn't catch the sarcasm?
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Enjoy Supermax, loser.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I know you think you know, but, believe me, it was NEVER addressed during the trial.
And when prosecutors tried to explain away the total lack of Dzhokhar Tsarnaevs fingerprints on the bomb making materials, they simply tossed aside the pressing issue of who really constructed the marathon bombs and where:
Inspire magazine [an Al Qaeda publication] advises to wear gloves when building bombsit could mean the defendant was wearing gloves, said Chakravarty. But more important than who built the bombs is how they used the things.
While no one was expecting anything other than a guilty verdict for Tsarnaev, the question of who built the bombs and where is a salient one. It should concern anyone who would seek to prevent future bombings.
http://whowhatwhy.org/2015/04/13/tsarnaev-guilty-but-who-made-the-bombs/
If he and his brother were, indeed, lone wolves, why wasn't this addressed at trial?
Please read my statement above about my general knowledge of this case and the legal issues that I saw in covering this case that should never have been allowed to occur.
Again, I'm not arguing his guilt or innocence - I'm arguing that the way this trial was conducted was a judicial overreach that threatens our Constitution. It should have been treated like any other death penalty case, but wasn't.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I so love that show. That guys is fantastic.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)I don't think he didn't do it. I think the court shiv is a bad thing.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)Yes, it was.
And it failed.
And he'll get endless appeals.
The fact is that he asked for life without parole in October 2013 and Carmen Ortiz refused.
Why?
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)That's it - no more about this little piece of garbage.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Gee. What a shame.
She'll be reduced to appealing parking tickets after this setback. Not.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)and he follows the case about as closely as anyone.
realFedUp
(25,053 posts)If you have the death penalty facing you....you have appeals. Duh and shame on jury decision.
tymorial
(3,433 posts)At the same time I believe that the current system in place at Supermax facilities to be cruel and unusual punishment. Perpetual and long term solitary confinement and isolation causes psychiatric breaks. Because humans are social creatures, it IS torture in my opinion. Some countries have ended solitary except for extreme circumstances or if extreme punishment is required. Even then it is for limited periods of time. I am not opposed to solitary in these circumstances. I do not support the death penalty in general but given this reality, I can't say that I wouldn't prefer to be put to death rather than eventually lose everything to madness.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)This is what this trial should have been about - and you are either from Boston or sympathetic to it - so it makes me happy know that there are people there that know this isn't right. He's been in solitary since his incarceration and has an FBI agent when he meets with his attorneys.
I don't think he's innocent. I think that's it's crap that we don't care.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)What, exactly, should we feel?
tymorial
(3,433 posts)My cousin lived on the street where the firefight happened and the brother was shot. I worked with a woman who was volunteering at the site for where the bombs went off. She was in the hospital for weeks. She was hit in the head by another persons arm or leg.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)would have appealed if he was sentenced to five days.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)He asked for LWOP and your federal prosecutor nixed it.
You need to read up instead of calling me names and shaking your smilie head upthread. He offered in October 2013 and Carmen Ortiz refused. She wanted DEATH.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Last edited Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:38 AM - Edit history (1)
Seriously.
"He asked", huh? - who gives a damn what "he" asked?
And he and his lawyers will appeal on any grounds in order to save his sorry ass, DP or not - even down to the lack of parking spaces near the court house or the color of the T busses on Atlantic Avenue.
aikoaiko
(34,170 posts)....eventually.
Fawke Em
(11,366 posts)God, I hope we get rid of the death penalty in this country (again) in my lifetime.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Massachusetts does not have the death penalty for a reason.
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)Had he be tried by the state, it would have been a different story.