Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:08 PM Jul 2015

Whoopi is still saying Cosby innocent until proven guilty

Why Whoopi? Why? Why is that what you have to say at this point?

http://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/2015/07/07/whoopi-goldberg-bill-cosby-is-innocent-until-proven-guilty/

Whoopi Goldberg is doubling down in her defense of Bill Cosby despite his admission in sworn testimony he gave women quaaludes to have sex with them.

“The View” host spoke about the most recent damning evidence against Cosby, which was revealed on Monday when previously sealed court documents were released. In a sworn deposition taken in 2005, the married entertainer admitted to purchasing quaaludes with the intention of giving them to women he wanted to have sex with.

“I think it’s, again, we’ll see what happens,” Goldberg said of the Cosby developments. “As more information comes out, people can make judgments. I don’t like snap judgments.”

The TV host added she didn’t care what critics would say of her stance.
102 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Whoopi is still saying Cosby innocent until proven guilty (Original Post) stevenleser Jul 2015 OP
"I don’t like snap judgments.” - I think she needs to look up the meaning of "snap judgement". PoliticAverse Jul 2015 #1
Dear Whoopi Kalidurga Jul 2015 #3
Cosby proudly voted for Obama oberliner Jul 2015 #15
But Dems don't tend to blame women and punish them for getting raped- hence their reluctance to bettyellen Jul 2015 #18
Yet, that doesn't make him a liberal. Kalidurga Jul 2015 #20
True oberliner Jul 2015 #21
There are rw democrats Kalidurga Jul 2015 #63
Whoopi isn't long for that show if she keeps defending Cosby. brush Jul 2015 #60
Whoopi's celebrity worship is nauseating... joeybee12 Jul 2015 #2
Her luuuuuve for The Donald is nauseating, too. Stardust Jul 2015 #28
She's a mixed bag... joeybee12 Jul 2015 #36
So true. I admired her a lot until she came up with these stinkers. Stardust Jul 2015 #39
I always assumed she was the voice of reason on The View... joeybee12 Jul 2015 #41
Wow, Whoopi has lost her marbles. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #4
Candace Cameron Bure was just as bad avebury Jul 2015 #5
At this point, she reminds me of -- Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2015 #6
You Described Me To A "T" ProfessorGAC Jul 2015 #7
"I Spy", "Fat Albert" -- Hell Hath No Fury Jul 2015 #13
Oh man - "Why Is There Air?" And "To My Brother Russell Who I Slept With" - I played those albums calimary Jul 2015 #29
Wow. She also defended Roman Polanski, saying that his rape of a 13-year old was not "rape-rape". Nye Bevan Jul 2015 #8
I remember that. SusanCalvin Jul 2015 #27
He has been a giant to many who watched his comedy, his career and his influence on the issues jwirr Jul 2015 #9
which begs the question.... Takket Jul 2015 #10
Statute of limitations cwydro Jul 2015 #12
oh... ALL of them? not even one is recent enough? Takket Jul 2015 #83
Not as yet. cwydro Jul 2015 #86
I'm hoping he stopped because of the legal complaints against him. bettyellen Jul 2015 #92
Whoopi Goldberg is an asshole. This is not a 'snap judgment' it's an accurate assessment of geek tragedy Jul 2015 #11
Isn't swearing to it under oath "proven guilty"?? LondonReign2 Jul 2015 #14
it's not 'proven guilty', but it is inculpable hearsay which is an exception HFRN Jul 2015 #78
Few Cosby posts on DU realFedUp Jul 2015 #16
She defends mel gibson and Roman Polanski also JI7 Jul 2015 #17
She is from the "that's the breaks" school where any woman who wants anything from a man should take bettyellen Jul 2015 #19
Right. Who needs a trial and conviction? That's so Old School. Octafish Jul 2015 #22
. stevenleser Jul 2015 #23
And you call yourself a Democrat? Octafish Jul 2015 #24
. stevenleser Jul 2015 #25
Not the words I'd use, but, what the heck. Octafish Jul 2015 #53
You can't accuse me of anything. I haven't been convicted. nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #55
That's why I put in a photo and everything. Octafish Jul 2015 #58
Doesn't matter. You shouldnt even be making the accusation according to your own principles stevenleser Jul 2015 #59
Where did I call ''48+ women likely liars''? Octafish Jul 2015 #61
PRESUMED innocent... Ino Jul 2015 #102
Statute of limitations realFedUp Jul 2015 #26
Other posters have pointed out out-of-court settlements got people to drop charges, too. Octafish Jul 2015 #57
Ever hear of sworn testimony? Do you understand the legal implications of his deposition? pnwmom Jul 2015 #45
Thanks for the legal lesson. He has not been convicted in a court of law. Octafish Jul 2015 #52
And so now you have a lot of apologies to make. To all the folks who you have accused of stuff who stevenleser Jul 2015 #54
Stick with the BFEE, stevenleser. You say they're innocent until proven guilty. Octafish Jul 2015 #62
He avoided a court of law by paying off women he swore he raped. Are you fine with that? pnwmom Jul 2015 #65
Giving quaaludes to someone and then having sex with them isn't illegal onenote Jul 2015 #56
Actually, it is illegal to give quaaludes to someone, unless you're a medical person . nt pnwmom Jul 2015 #66
Which is why I said other than possession or distribution he hasn't admitted to a criminal act. onenote Jul 2015 #71
Are Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld all innocent too? Nye Bevan Jul 2015 #30
That is a problem. Maybe if I just ignore it, then it will go away. Octafish Jul 2015 #37
No, there were apparently no wars for profits because no one was convicted. You shouldnt be stevenleser Jul 2015 #43
Do you know what ''sophistry'' means? Octafish Jul 2015 #50
Do you know what "hoisted by your own petard" means? nt stevenleser Jul 2015 #51
Tell me about it. Octafish Jul 2015 #69
The BFEE has never been convicted of anything. So now I expect you will argue anytime they are stevenleser Jul 2015 #31
Where did I say we should ignore criminality? Octafish Jul 2015 #40
There is no strawman, you are undone by your own principles as you have stated them. stevenleser Jul 2015 #44
That is a legal construct. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #34
Thanks. I was brought up different, I guess. Octafish Jul 2015 #38
You were brought up with a courtroom in your parent's house? Were you never punished for anything? stevenleser Jul 2015 #46
Octafish, Cosby swore, in a legal deposition, that he had acquired quaaludes pnwmom Jul 2015 #47
Post removed Post removed Jul 2015 #48
Lol- you don't apply it to the banksters and Cheney- or whoever you think killed Kennedy!! Lol bettyellen Jul 2015 #73
Where did I ''apologize for rape'' or a rapist, bettyellen? Octafish Jul 2015 #75
FYI: There's nothing funny about the assassination of President Kennedy. Ask Poppy Bush. Octafish Jul 2015 #77
Lol- I get it! It's okay for YOU to write pages about who's guilty in conspiracies too numerous to.. bettyellen Jul 2015 #84
No, you don't get anything about me. Otherwise you'd write about what I wrote. Octafish Jul 2015 #88
The "crimes" you write about weren't proven in a court of law. bettyellen Jul 2015 #90
Well, when the people breaking the laws make them, all I'm left with is a pen. Octafish Jul 2015 #91
No- you're just using inconsistent logic. I'm guessing you think most criminals shouldn't be bettyellen Jul 2015 #94
What logic? Responding to you? Octafish Jul 2015 #95
no one has to quote you because we've all read the endless posts indicting Bush and Cheney.... bettyellen Jul 2015 #96
So, you can smear me by accusing me of supporting rapists. Octafish Jul 2015 #97
He hasn't been in court because he was rich enough to buy off his accusers. pnwmom Jul 2015 #42
but that's the point... lame54 Jul 2015 #64
The problem: The law treats the rich differently from everyone else. Octafish Jul 2015 #68
No one is discussing whether he can be convicted - we all know it's impossible.... bettyellen Jul 2015 #72
What do you know about me? You don't even bother to quote what I actually wrote. Octafish Jul 2015 #74
I agree with several others. bloom Jul 2015 #98
Oh S-N-A-P Whoopie!! benld74 Jul 2015 #32
It appears as though she is correct with respect to a court of law. NCTraveler Jul 2015 #33
Then Whoopi has shit for brains AngryAmish Jul 2015 #35
I'm pretty sure Goldberg is paid to make snap judgements Snobblevitch Jul 2015 #49
is she helping o.j. find the real killer? restorefreedom Jul 2015 #67
oj has checked every golf course in the country HFRN Jul 2015 #82
Whoopi twang. KamaAina Jul 2015 #70
Whoopi fucking do. GeorgeGist Jul 2015 #76
Pill Cosby Major Nikon Jul 2015 #79
LOL good one. nt BreakfastClub Jul 2015 #87
She probably still views Mike Vick as an innocent victim too. bullwinkle428 Jul 2015 #80
maybe it's because he never made an advance on her HFRN Jul 2015 #81
The usual cutting edge, investigative journalism we have come to expect from Katashi_itto Jul 2015 #85
As I said in the other thread, I don't think there is any amount of evidence that would lead davidpdx Jul 2015 #89
and once proven, she'll probably still say "it wasn't rape rape" Adenoid_Hynkel Jul 2015 #93
Technically, legally that is true: Cosby hasn't been proven guilty in a court of law Tatiana La Belle Jul 2015 #99
Kick, for shits and giggles... SidDithers Jul 2015 #100
A "Comic Relief" performance by Jeff Ross (toastmaster) included his observing Whoopi rudely randys1 Jul 2015 #101

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
1. "I don’t like snap judgments.” - I think she needs to look up the meaning of "snap judgement".
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:11 PM
Jul 2015

Several years and 40 women later doesn't qualify.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
3. Dear Whoopi
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jul 2015

Even conservatives get that he is a rapist. Do you know how hard it is to convince a conservative that another conservative is guilty of anything?

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
18. But Dems don't tend to blame women and punish them for getting raped- hence their reluctance to
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 02:26 PM
Jul 2015

Believe women who are raped.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
20. Yet, that doesn't make him a liberal.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 02:49 PM
Jul 2015

Nor does it follow that someone voting for Republicans makes a person a conservative.

 

oberliner

(58,724 posts)
21. True
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 02:59 PM
Jul 2015

But for the vast majority of his public life he certainly presented himself as a Democrat. And he has donated primarily to Democrats - and spoke out in support of Obama throughout his two campaigns.

Just saying not every bad person is a right winger.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
63. There are rw democrats
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:37 PM
Jul 2015

the authoritarian/anti-authoritarian scale might be more helpful. Cosby is an authoritarian type and no they are not all bad we all need some structure and rules in our lives. But, the say as I do type and the my way or the highway type are almost always bad.

brush

(53,781 posts)
60. Whoopi isn't long for that show if she keeps defending Cosby.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:32 PM
Jul 2015

He admitted that he was guilty in the deposition.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
2. Whoopi's celebrity worship is nauseating...
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jul 2015

Any joe schmoe off the street she would have thrown to the wolves years ago, but Bill is famous, and of course she and he are so much better than the rest of us...Whoopi needs to go away.

 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
36. She's a mixed bag...
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:55 PM
Jul 2015

Very good on some issues, but as you noted, totally out there on some...like supporting The Donald.

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
6. At this point, she reminds me of --
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:15 PM
Jul 2015

those folks during the Bush years who would support/believe/defend the worst of his actions despite evidence and reality.

She is, of course, correct that he is innocent until proven guilty. That doesn't mean that I cannot come to a personal conclusion based on a preponderance of available evidence. And my conclusion KILLS me, because I was a HUGE fan on Mr. Cosby from the time I was a little girl in the 60s.

ProfessorGAC

(65,049 posts)
7. You Described Me To A "T"
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:35 PM
Jul 2015

Well, except for the "little girl in the 60's" part. But i too was a huge fan of "To My Brother Russel" and "200 MPH" and "Why Is There Air?" The Y chromosome prohibits me from fitting the other description!

 

Hell Hath No Fury

(16,327 posts)
13. "I Spy", "Fat Albert" --
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jul 2015

"The chicken heart that ate New York" -- that was my growing up. I got to see him perform when I was around 11 years old. He had the crowd rolling in the aisles. Seriously good times for folks like us. Totally marred, sadly.

calimary

(81,281 posts)
29. Oh man - "Why Is There Air?" And "To My Brother Russell Who I Slept With" - I played those albums
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:36 PM
Jul 2015

again and again and again. LOVED 'em. Loved HIM, too!

I've never had any reason to doubt any of the women who've come forward about him. I even have a friend who used to do a lot of acting and she said he came on to her a little but it didn't go anywhere in her case. And I must say I interviewed him back then, myself. He never came onto me. But then again, I was never all that physically attractive, the way these other models and actresses (including my friend) were at that time. It was weird though. I had all these preconceptions about him based on all those comedy albums I'd listened to and had come to love - and love him for. And I got there to the office at Universal where he and several male assistants were holed up. It was a very strained atmosphere. He was a cold fish. Not friendly or warm or congenial as his onstage personality showed. I was prepared for a loose, freewheeling interview filled with one-liners and bits and recollections and personality and stuff. Got NOTHING of the kind. He was cold and forbidding and closed. I was very disappointed. I was SO looking forward to some cool soundbites. Got NOTHING.

This, too, has been so disappointing. Because with an individual like him, you just don't want it to be true.

Whoopi Goldberg is still there, I'm afraid. Many of the rest of us left that place long ago. YES innocent until proven guilty. YES of course. But Sheesh - when he admits it... Whoopi, how much more is there that you'd need?

Frankly, I don't want it to be true either, and never did. Shows you how powerful branding is!!! And he had a 24-karat-gold brand there for a long time. He was "America's Dad," and with the comedy albums and tours and even the Jello commercials. But it certainly does seem to be exactly that. Especially when we now have his own admissions about it.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
8. Wow. She also defended Roman Polanski, saying that his rape of a 13-year old was not "rape-rape".
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:42 PM
Jul 2015

Very weird and disappointing.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
9. He has been a giant to many who watched his comedy, his career and his influence on the issues
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:49 PM
Jul 2015

for decades. He is one of the most well known black performers to all of us regardless of race. As such it is very hard to learn that he has clay feet.

When I watch this story unfold my heart aches. There is a great lose in this story and it is not just the lose of innocence. I remember his skit from the 60s regarding "They came for the _________ first...." And there were others. And I remember much more. There was never a hint of the clay feet. He spoke across the barriers of race and we all listened.

It is sad that we did not see what was happening and I ask myself "Why didn't we see this?" It has come as a shock even now. I can understand Whoopi. She is hurting and our hero has clay feet.

Takket

(21,573 posts)
10. which begs the question....
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:51 PM
Jul 2015

When is an arrest going to be made so we can get to work on the "proving him guilty" part?

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
11. Whoopi Goldberg is an asshole. This is not a 'snap judgment' it's an accurate assessment of
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 12:51 PM
Jul 2015

all the wrong-assed stuff she's projectile-vomited over the years.

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
78. it's not 'proven guilty', but it is inculpable hearsay which is an exception
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:47 PM
Jul 2015

to the hearsay rule of evidence 804.3(A)

which could lead to a conviction or civil judgement

realFedUp

(25,053 posts)
16. Few Cosby posts on DU
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 02:18 PM
Jul 2015

Unbelievable. The revealed facts from hard work by a reporter of his admission he intentionally used drugs to have many unconscious women for him to rape, sodomize, whatever and There isn't more reaction or prompts for his arrest is unconscionable. I don't care if he invented electricity which at least would have improved lives. The fact that he's still hiding these crimes makes him the worst kind of human being. People defending him are indefensible in my eyes. Whoopie et al is in such a hideous denial.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
19. She is from the "that's the breaks" school where any woman who wants anything from a man should take
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jul 2015

What ever is handed to her. The kind hat judges the victims behavior more than the rapist. As if they should have expected this! Which is nuts because no one expected shit like this from
Cosby- certainly not women who befriended him. Yikes.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
22. Right. Who needs a trial and conviction? That's so Old School.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:03 PM
Jul 2015

New School means we know who's guilty without a trial because an expert tells us so.

PS: Going from the news reports, Cosby looks guilty to me -- but he hasn't been convicted in court. Until that happens, he's innocent.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
24. And you call yourself a Democrat?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jul 2015

Ever hear of the Constitution? The Bill of Rights? Civil Rights? That's the Old School I'm talking about.

PS: Really nice emoticon. So profound.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
58. That's why I put in a photo and everything.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:30 PM
Jul 2015

Unsettling in a way to read so many DUers don't understand my point by stating that, in the United States of America, one is innocent until proven guilty.



Then, again, some don't want to understand what I wrote if it presents an opportunity to smear.

ETA: Forgot picture.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
59. Doesn't matter. You shouldnt even be making the accusation according to your own principles
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:31 PM
Jul 2015

that supposedly have you calling 48+ women likely liars.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
61. Where did I call ''48+ women likely liars''?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:33 PM
Jul 2015
Straw man.

This is the fallacy of refuting a caricatured or extreme version of somebody's argument, rather than the actual argument they've made. Often this fallacy involves putting words into somebody's mouth by saying they've made arguments they haven't actually made, in which case the straw man argument is a veiled version of argumentum ad logicam. One example of a straw man argument would be to say, "Mr. Jones thinks that capitalism is good because everybody earns whatever wealth they have, but this is clearly false because many people just inherit their fortunes," when in fact Mr. Jones had not made the "earnings" argument and had instead argued, say, that capitalism gives most people an incentive to work and save. The fact that some arguments made for a policy are wrong does not imply that the policy itself is wrong.

realFedUp

(25,053 posts)
26. Statute of limitations
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:24 PM
Jul 2015

Is the only rule standing in the way of justice and punishment finally for this man.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
57. Other posters have pointed out out-of-court settlements got people to drop charges, too.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:28 PM
Jul 2015

Personally, I think men CONVICTED of drugging and raping unconscious women should be given life terms.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
45. Ever hear of sworn testimony? Do you understand the legal implications of his deposition?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:10 PM
Jul 2015

He gave a sworn deposition, under penalty of perjury, that he had acquired quaaludes a number of times for the purpose of having sex with women; and on at least one occasion gave them to a woman.

He convicted himself with his own sworn testimony.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
52. Thanks for the legal lesson. He has not been convicted in a court of law.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:23 PM
Jul 2015

Are you in law school, pnwmom? You sure know your stuff.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
54. And so now you have a lot of apologies to make. To all the folks who you have accused of stuff who
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:26 PM
Jul 2015

haven't been convicted.

I'm sure the list is long as you have accused me of many things in the past, heck many things just under this OP.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
62. Stick with the BFEE, stevenleser. You say they're innocent until proven guilty.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:36 PM
Jul 2015

Show where I've accused any Bush or BFEE crony -- or anyone, for that matter -- of anything that I have not backed up by fact.

Show where I've intentionally lied or presented information that was not true on DU.

Go through my Journal on DU3 or DU2.

Show, stevenleser.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
65. He avoided a court of law by paying off women he swore he raped. Are you fine with that?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jul 2015

And don't tell me we don't know. We do -- because of his sworn deposition.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
56. Giving quaaludes to someone and then having sex with them isn't illegal
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:28 PM
Jul 2015

any more than smoking a joint with someone and then having sex with them is illegal.

The issue is whether the woman he gave quaaludes to knew she was be given the drugs or were they given without her consent. That isn't answered in the sworn testimony. There are a host of possibilities. He slipped her the quaalude without her knowing -- unlikely. He gave her the quaalude but didn't tell her what it was or its effects. He gave it to her and she knew what it was. And probably several other scenarios.

I think there is plenty of evidence that Cosby drugged women and had sex with them. There are credible claims that in some if not all instances, the drug was administered without the woman's knowledge. But is there sworn testimony from Cosby admitting to a criminal act (apart from possession and distribution of a controlled substance)? Not from this transcript.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
71. Which is why I said other than possession or distribution he hasn't admitted to a criminal act.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:59 PM
Jul 2015

I guess you missed that part. And I took your statements that he had made a sworn admission of criminality to refer to having sex with women against their will not to possessing and distributing drugs.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
37. That is a problem. Maybe if I just ignore it, then it will go away.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:56 PM
Jul 2015

How's your future doing? More wars without end for profits without cease?

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
43. No, there were apparently no wars for profits because no one was convicted. You shouldnt be
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:08 PM
Jul 2015

saying that, according to your own principles as you have articulated them here.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
50. Do you know what ''sophistry'' means?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:21 PM
Jul 2015


Cover art by Gary Trudeau for Lies Of Our Times - A Magazine to Correct the Record, published between 1990-1994.
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
31. The BFEE has never been convicted of anything. So now I expect you will argue anytime they are
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:43 PM
Jul 2015

accused of anything that they are "innocent until proven guilty!"

Shout it to the rooftops!!!

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
40. Where did I say we should ignore criminality?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:04 PM
Jul 2015

Is that the only way you can "win" an argument, by creating a strawman, stevenleser? Shows what you know.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
44. There is no strawman, you are undone by your own principles as you have stated them.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:09 PM
Jul 2015

If there is a strawman, explain it to us.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
34. That is a legal construct.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:51 PM
Jul 2015

Not one for personal lives. If you truly attempt to bring that process into your personal life, you are setting yourself and those around you up for pain. No one in society brings "innocent until proven guilty" into their personal lives. It is not possible and would be foolish.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
38. Thanks. I was brought up different, I guess.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:58 PM
Jul 2015

I remember "Innocent until proven Guilty."

If that's not your thing, I've got no problem with you.

If you were on TV claiming to represent Democrats, though, that's another thing.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
46. You were brought up with a courtroom in your parent's house? Were you never punished for anything?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:10 PM
Jul 2015

I mean, your parents must have been really busy having to haul you to a courtroom everytime they suspected you of taking a cookie to which you weren't entitled.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
47. Octafish, Cosby swore, in a legal deposition, that he had acquired quaaludes
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:12 PM
Jul 2015

so that he could give them to women he wanted sex with; and that he did give them to at least one woman.

He convicted himself with his own words.

Response to pnwmom (Reply #47)

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
73. Lol- you don't apply it to the banksters and Cheney- or whoever you think killed Kennedy!! Lol
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 08:41 PM
Jul 2015

Full of baloney, you are.
Rape apology is disgusting- but not surprising though.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
75. Where did I ''apologize for rape'' or a rapist, bettyellen?
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:29 PM
Jul 2015

You are smearing me.

73. Lol- you don't apply it to the banksters and Cheney- or whoever you think killed Kennedy!! Lol

Full of baloney, you are.
Rape apology is disgusting- but not surprising though.


I just showed where you're full of balloney.

So, if I'm full of baloney, show where.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
77. FYI: There's nothing funny about the assassination of President Kennedy. Ask Poppy Bush.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:43 PM
Jul 2015
Poppy Bush warned FBI -- AFTER -- JFK assassinated.

In the hour of the death of President John F. Kennedy, Texas oilman George Herbert Walker Bush named a suspect to the FBI in a "confidential" phone call. He then added he was heading for Dallas. Skeptics need not take my word for it, that's what Poppy told the FBI:



Here's a transcript of the text:



TO: SAC, HOUSTON DATE: 11-22-63

FROM: SA GRAHAM W. KITCHEL

SUBJECT: UNKNOWN SUBJECT;
ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT
JOHN F. KENNEDY

At 1:45 p.m. Mr. GEORGE H. W. BUSH, President of the Zapata Off-Shore Drilling Company, Houston, Texas, residence 5525 Briar, Houston, telephonically furnished the following information to writer by long distance telephone call from Tyler, Texas.

BUSH stated that he wanted to be kept confidential but wanted to furnish hearsay that he recalled hearing in recent weeks, the day and source unknown. He stated that one JAMES PARROTT has been talking of killing the President when he comes to Houston.

BUSH stated that PARROTT is possibly a student at the University of Houston and is active in political matters in this area. He stated that he felt Mrs. FAWLEY, telephone number SU 2-5239, or ARLINE SMITH, telephone number JA 9-9194 of the Harris County Republican Party Headquarters would be able to furnish additional information regarding the identity of PARROTT.

BUSH stated that he was proceeding to Dallas, Texas, would remain in the Sheraton-Dallas Hotel and return to his residence on 11-23-63. His office telephone number is CA 2-0395.

# # #



Gee. Why was Poppy Bush in Dallas when JFK was assassinated?

Could it be, he was on official business? I suspect he was on Secret Government business. After all, his eldest son bragged during his Texas Air National Guard and Harvard grad school days that his daddy was CIA.

Here's an FBI document from the same week of the assassination in which FBI Director J Edgar Hoover briefed one "Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency." Some strange coincidence there, wot?



Here's a transcript of the above:



Date: November 29, 1963

To: Director
Bureau of Intelligence and Research
Department of State

From: John Edgar Hoover, Director

Subject: ASSASSINATION OF PRESIDENT JOHN F. KENNEDY
NOVEMBER 22, 1963

Our Miami, Florida, Office on November 23, 1963, advised that the Office of Coordinator of Cuban Affairs in Miami advised that the Department of State feels some misguided anti-Castro group might capitalize on the present situation and undertake an unauthorized raid against Cuba, believing that the assassination of President John F. Kennedy might herald a change in U. S. policy, which is not true.

Our sources and informants familiar with Cuban matters in the Miami area advise that the general feeling in the anti-Castro Cuban community is one of stunned disbelief and, even among those who did not entirely agree with the President's policy concerning Cuba, the feeling is that the President's death represents a great loss not only to the U. S. but to all of Latin America. These sources know of no plans for unauthorized action against Cuba.

An informant who has furnished reliable information in the past and who is close to a small pro-Castro group in Miami has advised that these individuals are afraid that the assassination of the President may result in strong repressive measures being taken against them and, although pro-Castro in their feelings, regret the assassination.

The substance of the foregoing information was orally furnished to Mr. George Bush of the Central Intelligence Agency and Captain William Edwards of the Defense Intelligence Agency on November 23, 1963, by Mr. W. T. Forsyth of this Bureau.

# # #



I do remember that GHWB was head of the CIA when the Church Committee was looking into the CIA assassination programs. He made things all friendly-like and turned what had been a serious hunt for truth under previous DCI Colby into another dog-and-pony show that was big on show and light on facts.

Regarding Dallas: Now I don't know if Poppy was a trigger man, was only there to watch what happened or what just happened to be there. I do know Poppy Bush has never explained these memos. He's never even admitted where he was the day JFK was killed.

Seeing how he would go on to become President, as would his dim son, I believe it's vitally important that we learn the Truth.

Why? The United States and the world haven't been the same since November 22, 1963. And not a single major player in the nation's mass media have stepped up and demanded a real investigation. So, it's up to us, We the People.

What's more, Poppy Bush sheltered mass-murdering jet-bombing terrorists like Luis Posada Carriles.

The guy is a player in what criminologists see as a crime family. His father, for the record, was into business with the NAZIs before becoming a big shot in the Senate. And his idiot son was selected 5-4 by a fascist Supreme Court to "serve" as pretzeldent. Show me where I'm wrong about any of that and I'll apologize, bettyellen. Until then, so long.
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
84. Lol- I get it! It's okay for YOU to write pages about who's guilty in conspiracies too numerous to..
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 10:19 PM
Jul 2015

Mention and THAT is okay.
But when Cosby admits to details of how he planned to incapacitate women - making his plan serial RAPE for fucks sake!!- were supposed to thinks hey maybe it wasn't.
Sorry dude. He admitted it. Go home with any other theory- it's OVER.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
88. No, you don't get anything about me. Otherwise you'd write about what I wrote.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 08:21 AM
Jul 2015

As a journalist, I support the idea one is innocent until proven guilty in court.

As a citizen of the United States, I support holding the government accountable for its crimes. That's why I write about the crimes of the national security state, in particular.

Reading your interesting replies shows me that you don't have much of an understanding of either point.

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
90. The "crimes" you write about weren't proven in a court of law.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:30 AM
Jul 2015

But Lordy you do go one and on (and on and on) about them, don't you? But Cosby gets a pass.

Isn't that special?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
91. Well, when the people breaking the laws make them, all I'm left with is a pen.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:54 AM
Jul 2015

Thanks for showing me where you stand on the issues!

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
94. No- you're just using inconsistent logic. I'm guessing you think most criminals shouldn't be
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 02:54 PM
Jul 2015

Behind bars unless they're part of the BFFE or 1%?
I seem to remember that from some threads about the prison industrial complex.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
95. What logic? Responding to you?
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 03:13 PM
Jul 2015

You never quote what I say, just what you think I said.

bettyellen

73. Lol- you don't apply it to the banksters and Cheney- or whoever you think killed Kennedy!! Lol

Full of baloney, you are.
Rape apology is disgusting- but not surprising though.


That doesn't leave much room for discussion, let alone analysis. Good luck with your logic.
 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
96. no one has to quote you because we've all read the endless posts indicting Bush and Cheney....
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 03:28 PM
Jul 2015

Over and over and over again. They are burned into our collective brains.
It is notable the extra courtesy you are willing to extend someone who admits he drugs women to rape them. Yeah- he called it sex, but lawfully that makes it rape.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
97. So, you can smear me by accusing me of supporting rapists.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 03:59 PM
Jul 2015
bettyellen (27,622 posts)

73. Lol- you don't apply it to the banksters and Cheney- or whoever you think killed Kennedy!! Lol

Full of baloney, you are.
Rape apology is disgusting- but not surprising though.


But you can't show me where I say anything you say.

pnwmom

(108,978 posts)
42. He hasn't been in court because he was rich enough to buy off his accusers.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:07 PM
Jul 2015

That case that we KNOW he settled, for example.

But he admitted in his sworn deposition that he gave quaaludes to at least one woman for the purpose of sex.

That is rape, by his own admission.

He isn't innocent.

lame54

(35,290 posts)
64. but that's the point...
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:46 PM
Jul 2015

he will never see the inside of a court room

opinions are not verdicts and he has no immunity from opinions

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
68. The problem: The law treats the rich differently from everyone else.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:56 PM
Jul 2015

I never wrote you or anyone couldn't voice an opinion.

I wrote Cosby has not been convicted of anything.

What I should have posted on each and every one of the replies in this piece of shit OP:

[font size="7"]I have no respect for sexual predators.[/font size]

 

bettyellen

(47,209 posts)
72. No one is discussing whether he can be convicted - we all know it's impossible....
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 08:36 PM
Jul 2015

Funny that that bothers you about Cheney and Wall Street bankers but not one whit about rapists.
Women everywhere thank you a fuck ton for doubting their word- even when forty tell the same story- you enjoy casting doubt.

You have plenty of other opinions about who is guilty- search your conscience to figure out why this is an issue for you.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
74. What do you know about me? You don't even bother to quote what I actually wrote.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:27 PM
Jul 2015

What you did was attribute to me things I did not say:

Funny that that bothers you about Cheney and Wall Street bankers but not one whit about rapists.
Women everywhere thank you a fuck ton for doubting their word- even when forty tell the same story- you enjoy casting doubt.

You have plenty of other opinions about who is guilty- search your conscience to figure out why this is an issue for you.

-- bettyellen


Doing so is a smear.

bloom

(11,635 posts)
98. I agree with several others.
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:28 PM
Jul 2015

You normally seem pretty reasonable.

When it comes to what we know about Cosby - I think it is as reasonable to consider him guilty as it is to consider any of the Bushes guilty.

Perhaps you haven't read much about the many reports against him. How many victims does it take? How much of his own corroborating testimony do we need?

And why, all of a sudden do you think the justice system works so well in convicting famous, celebrity rapists - yet you think it is reasonable to proclaim former presidents and others guilty because you decided they were - whether any justice system says so or not?


 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
33. It appears as though she is correct with respect to a court of law.
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 03:49 PM
Jul 2015

Where she is wrong is in public opinion. It is a distinction few take the time to understand. Innocent until proven guilty is a legal construct. It has no bearing outside of the legal system unless put in place by some group as their own guidelines for finding fault. At this point, it also isn't a snap judgment. The guy is clearly guilty.

Snobblevitch

(1,958 posts)
49. I'm pretty sure Goldberg is paid to make snap judgements
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 04:16 PM
Jul 2015

about people every single day that television show she has been on.

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
81. maybe it's because he never made an advance on her
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 09:49 PM
Jul 2015

and she feels that if he were really 'on the make' he would have

 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
85. The usual cutting edge, investigative journalism we have come to expect from
Tue Jul 7, 2015, 11:03 PM
Jul 2015

our noble poster.

Awesome work.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
89. As I said in the other thread, I don't think there is any amount of evidence that would lead
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 10:28 AM
Jul 2015

Goldberg or others who support Cosby to believe he raped the women. The whole thing has been so thoroughly covered up by Cosby and everyone else involved, which is why he was able to avoid being charged before the statue of limitation. I still think the key to getting some of these people (including Cosby) is the cover-up.

 

Adenoid_Hynkel

(14,093 posts)
93. and once proven, she'll probably still say "it wasn't rape rape"
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 12:09 PM
Jul 2015

like she did for Polanski.

She's an imbecile, like pretty much everyone to ever appear on that Barbara Walters trainwreck (except Joy Behar).

 

Tatiana La Belle

(152 posts)
99. Technically, legally that is true: Cosby hasn't been proven guilty in a court of law
Wed Jul 8, 2015, 11:53 PM
Jul 2015

At this point, though, there are just too many of these stories to keep her head in the sand. Eventually Whoopi is going to have to look at things the way they are.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
101. A "Comic Relief" performance by Jeff Ross (toastmaster) included his observing Whoopi rudely
Tue Jul 14, 2015, 05:38 PM
Jul 2015

yelling at one of the producers during the show.

Jeff told the story to someone,, Whoopi got word and sent Jeff a gift basket with a note

"Dear Jeff, you dont have to be a fan but you do have to get your facts straight, I did not and never have chewed out a director or producer"

He sent a gift basket back "Yes you did, right in front of me"

Personally I havent liked her for a while now.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Whoopi is still saying Co...