General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGreece is a tiny part of the Eurozone. The ECB could have taken over their debts without inflation
But Teh Moral Hazard!!! The only moral hazard issue we see these days is that big banks lend without fear of default, knowing well that they - not the people - will be bailed out. Both could be bailed out, of course, but apparently that's not an option. Because serving the people is not what these institutions are for.
http://www.eschatonblog.com/2015/07/success-stories.html
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Inflation wasn't the concern--not getting paid back is the concern. Throwing good money after bad was the concern.
Plus, if Greece can demand it, why can't Spain, and Italy, and every other debt-ridden or poor country.
It is true that Greece is a tiny part of the Eurozone.
Which is why the Grexit remains the only viable solution to this mess. Greece needs to control its own monetary policy.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Just two days ago Wikileaks released a document from 2011 where German Chancellor Angela Merkel who told her personal assistant that Greece's debts would still be unsustainable under the terms of the new arrangement.
So basically the troika knows beyond a shadow of a doubt that the crushing austerity they are forcing upon Greece is doomed to fail. Greece will never be able to pay these debts.
Yet neither the IMF, nor the ECB, nor the political leaders of Europe are willing to change course. Why?
The debt, in other words, isn't about money. It's about political control."
(my bold)
http://www.opednews.com/articles/26-Centuries-later-Athens-by-Daily-Kos-Debt_Debtor-Nation_Democracy_Greece-150705-780.html
Entailed is that the way to get paid back is to annul the debt.
I've had unsustainable debt before. That meant, I guess, I was doomed to fail.
But I really had three choices: I could sit back and say, "meh, unsustainable now and that can't be changed, it is the master of my destiny," then declare bankruptcy; I could refinance and consolidate debts and hope to lower the payments, even though it meant I'd pay more over a longer period and have to scrimp (personal-level "austerity" ; I could find a way of increasing my ability to pay so the unsustainable debt was not only sustainable but diminishing.
Four years later the $10k on one credit card, $5k on the other were paid off, and we missed defaulting on our mortgage by a month. We made structural changes to our domestic economy to reduce inefficiency and increase income, while restructuring short-term debt to allow the domestic changes to take effect.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Who knew? But let's look at your analogy.
You didn't actually say what you did: did you refinance, consolidate and lower payments? Incidentally, restructuring is exactly what the troika refused to do, and it is exactly what the current government of Greece was elected on.
And while you were addressing your debt, did someone require you to quit one of your jobs, thereby producing less income, or did you find a way to produce more? When austerity measures are pushed on a country already in trouble, what happens? Exactly what happened here, said economy contracted, in this case by 25%. They have suffered sustained 25% unemployment...for 7 years. What was that definition of insanity again?
Meanwhile the debt keeps piling up. At this point even the IMF is willing to admit the debt is "unsustainable" so maybe you should too.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Does your income decrease by more than a dollar every time you cut a dollar in spending? It's does in Greece.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)1) we have too much debt, we can't pay everyone back
2) please lend us more money
Um, okay.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Under what conditions would you be willing to lend Greece money?
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)no one's arguing that austerity is a good thing--it's a stupid policy
the question is: is it not true that Greece is asking for debt relief while also seeking to take on more debt?
the phrase that covers such situations is "throwing good money after bad."
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Austerity is stupid (7 years after) but well, what can you do? Good money after bad. Tsk.
How much money? "Enough", and wipe out the debt. The banksters who engineered the depth of this crisis should suffer, and the EU should take a long hard look at itself, and decide if it wants to be a democracy or an empire. Whatever went before (and bear in mind it was not this Greek government that engendered this fiasco) Greece cannot recover under current conditions.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The people on the hook would be the taxpayers of European countries. they're the ones who are owed the debt, and they're the ones from whom any more bailout funds would come.
You are awfully generous with other people's money (cutting a blank check to Greece to be paid by working people in Europe), and awfully judgmental about people who lack that generosity with other people's money.
truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)As for the banks having taken their losses--um, no. Where do you think the money went from the loans in 2010 and 2012? To the tooth fairy?
http://digbysblog.blogspot.mx/2015/07/greece-and-european-project-whats-next.html
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)"Greece has made a titanic effort to finalize the decision on PSI [Private Sector Involvement] and conditions for granting the aid," Prime Minister Lucas Papademos told the cabinet meeting that approved the final text.
The debt swap deal is a precondition for Greece to receive a second rescue package worth 130 billion euros ($174 billion) from eurozone countries and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).
As part of the deal - also known as a haircut - private creditors are asked to trade in their Greek bonds for new ones offering lower interest rates and longer maturities. Bondholders are expected to take a nominal loss of 53.5 percent on their holdings, which equates to a real loss of 73 to 74 percent.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-15478358
◾Banks holding Greek debt would accept a 50% loss
◾A mechanism to boost the eurozone's main bailout fund to about 1tn euros (£880bn; $1.4tn)
◾Banks must also raise more capital to protect them against losses resulting from any future government defaults
The agreement is aimed at preventing the crisis spreading to larger eurozone economies like Italy, but the leaders said work still needed to be done.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/10/04/banks-in-europe-face-huge-losses-from-greece/?_r=0
While bank executives and government leaders have been reluctant to acknowledge that the hundreds of billions of euros of Greek debt held by financial institutions is worth far less than its face value, they are slowly accepting the grim reality, as investors, clients and lenders grow increasingly wary.
On Tuesday, Deutsche Bank said it would not meet its profit goals for the year, citing investor uncertainty and losses on Greek bond holdings. Government officials are debating dismantling Dexia, the large French-Belgian bank, and warehousing its troubled assets in a bad bank.
The latest woes prompted a broad market sell-off in Europe, hitting banks in France and Germany particularly hard. Wall Street, dragged down early by the problems on the Continent, lifted at the close, after reports that European financial officials were considering ways to shore up the industry.
Banks are not charities. And if they were there are lots of countries that need the help more than Greece.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)No country can stand when their central bank is dedicated to destroying them.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The ECB doesn't exist to benefit Greece. It's not funded by Greece.
Greece does have a central bank, but it is insolvent.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)The ECB is the central bank of the Eurozone and the Euro currency. it's co-owned by the central banks of all 28 EU members.
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)Bank of Greece abdicated their Monetary policy authority to the ECB.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)who retained the primary task of providing liquidity to their countries' banking system.\
Germany's central bank is the Bundesbank.
The ECB's purpose is to stabilize the value of the Euro. It is explicitly barred from acting as a lender of last resort to insolvent institutions.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)truebluegreen
(9,033 posts)Elites protecting elites, while plucking the citizens' pockets (the loans Greece received after the crash were intended to pay the banks), plundering the country for its assets, privatizing etc.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)to be expected, but hilarious non-the-less
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Taitertots
(7,745 posts)I guess it doesn't matter if dont care at all about the 700,000 people that live in Detroit.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)..say, Arizonans could retire earlier and with better pensions than yours? Without wondering why they wouldn't at least meet your own requirements if they needed a tenth or twentieth bailout from you?
Taitertots
(7,745 posts)The federal government sends trillions of dollars from productive states to unproductive states. It's literally the largest intentional wealth redistribution in human history.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)If any of that debt is forgiven, neighboring countries will be outraged that they have to pay their debts while Greece doesn't. It would be the end of the euro zone rather than the exit of just one member
Betty Karlson
(7,231 posts)They didn't need any assistance from the ECB. But then: they never allowed Goldman Sachs to swindle the entire European Union into believing that the Baltic states qualified for membership of the Euro-zone.
brooklynite
(94,581 posts)...and some Eastern European nations would probably be asking for a bailout as well.