Polygamy and Gay discussion should now ceased and put to the back burner

[Hutzpa]

anyone who is involved in such discussion should be led to the gulag.

It's like suddenly DU has gone Polygamy and Gay rights crazy.

Are outright racist now accepted on DU. My feeling is such discussion of said subject is based on prejudice.

Fucking time to move on from HATE.

It like minorities in America are not allowed finer things in life without some numpties going ape shit about it.

[NuclearDem]

1. Um...what?

[Hutzpa]

2. Are you having fun seeing threads after threads on polygany and gay rights? n/t

[cwydro]

5. Polygamy and gay rights are not synonymous.

But you know that, right?

[Hutzpa]

6. Was not suggesting that

the subject has run out it's course, time to move on. Now if schadenfreude is your style of discussion then by all means
continue.

[NuclearDem]

9. Samesex marriage is not the only concern of the LGBT community.

[Hutzpa]

11. So are you pissed at seeing same sex couple together?

[NuclearDem]

14. Was I that obvious?

[Hutzpa]

16. Your assumption is outside the LGBT crowd

there are others who are not happy at the decision, which led me to my question. Are you part of that crowd that are not happy
outside of the LGBT community.

[NuclearDem]

19. You're not understanding what I'm writing.

Marriage equality is not the end of the LGBT rights movement in this country. There are other important issues besides marriage equality that are of importance to the LGBT community.

Your suggestion we put gay rights on the backburner, therefore, shows your ignorance of the movement.

[Hutzpa]

20. Now that you've included insult with your response

no point in pursuing this conversation.

Your initial post was this;

Samesex marriage is not the only concern of the LGBT community.

To which I responded because the statement itself is convoluted, which maybe done on purpose.
No point in beating this point to the ground. Have nice day.

[NuclearDem]

21. ...what the hell just happened here?

[LostOne4Ever]

22. I think you got trolled. nt

[Skittles]

23. you don't want to know, NuclearDem

trust me

[Spider Jerusalem]

15. Plural marriage is not an issue for the LGBT community, for the most part

transgender rights are a lot more important, really. (If the "T" in "LGBT" means anything, anyway.)

[NuclearDem]

18. I worded that poorly.

What I meant was the legalization of samesex marriage didn't mean the end of the gay rights movement.

There are trans* rights and employment non-discrimination, to name a few.

[cwydro]

10. How does schadenfreude come into this?

I'm a wee bit confused.

But carry on.

[shenmue]

8. What's wrong with threads on gay rights?

[cwydro]

3. I'm thinking your heart may be in the right place (I think?),

but your OP may need some editing.

Just a suggestion.

[oberliner]

4. "My feeling is such discussion of said subject is based on racial prejudice."

Can you elaborate on what you mean by that?

[Hutzpa]

7. Is based on prejudice, whats there to explain?

[oberliner]

12. What does a discussion of polygamy have to do with racial prejudice?

I am not understanding the connection.

[Hutzpa]

17. The racial has been removed

prejudice is prejudice.

[Calista241]

13. Nothing to see here! Move along!

[NobodyHere]

24. If you don't like it

Then don't click on the threads. If people think polygamists relationships should be recognized by the state, then they should be able to make their arguments.

[AngryAmish]

25. The arc of history is long, but it bends toward justice.

Bigots will be remembered tho. I have bookmarked all the poly threads to make sure we lnow who is on the right side of history.